| Literature DB >> 28752500 |
Nakamasa Hayashi1, Koichi Mitsuya2, Yoko Nakasu2, Tateaki Naito3, Fumiharu Ohka4, Toshiaki Takahashi3.
Abstract
The embolization of cancer cells to cerebral vessels occurs early in the multi-step metastatic process. We aimed to determine whether the presence of leukoaraiosis (LA) before treatment would predict the development of brain metastases (BM) in patients with lung cancer. Between January 2014 and June 2015, 1007 patients underwent initial (i.e., prior to any chemotherapy) or routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain and exhibited no evidence of BM. Of these, 189 underwent repeat MR imaging; 34 of 189 patients (18%) developed new BM, whereas 155 patients did not. LA was retrospectively evaluated according to Fazekas scale on the initial screening MR images of these 189 patients. The frequency of grade 0 periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) was greater among patients with BM, compared to those without BM (p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, patients with adenocarcinoma (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-171.8) and small cell carcinoma (95% CI 1.4-172.4) respectively developed BM at 9.3- and 8.8-fold higher rates than those with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with grade 0 PVH developed BM at a rate 3.5-, 8.6-, and 3.6-fold higher rates than those with grade 1 (95% CI 1.4-9.0), 2 (95% CI 2.4-41.9), and 3 (95% CI 1.02-15.0), respectively. Lung cancer patients with grade 0 PVH on initial MR images have a high subsequent incidence of BM. PVH is a useful method for evaluating risk of BM.Entities:
Keywords: Brain metastasis; Leukoaraiosis; Lung cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; White matter lesion
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28752500 PMCID: PMC5663801 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2574-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130
Fig. 1Representative magnetic resonance (MR) images. a Fluid attenuated inversion recovery images showing the grade of periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) according to the Fazekas scale. b Showing deep white matter hyperintense signals (DWMH). The number in the upper right corner indicates the grade. c Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images showing the appearance of brain metastases in the vascular border zones. Note that two lesions are located in the anterior border zone situated between the anterior cerebral artery and middle cerebral artery supply territories (arrowhead), and in the posterior border zone situated between the anterior cerebral artery and posterior cerebral artery supply territories (arrow). d A lesion is located in the subcortical border zone situated in the most distal vascular field (arrow)
Clinical characteristics of study population at initial screening MR imaging
| Brain metastases | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 34) | No (n = 155) | ||
| Male sex | 23 (67.7%) | 101 (65.2%) | 0.78 |
| Median age (range) | 66 (46–85) | 66 (29–85) | 0.74* |
| <65 | 15 (44%) | 58 (37%) | 0.47 |
| ≥65 | 19 (56%) | 97 (63%) | |
| Stage | 0.06 | ||
| I | 2 (5.9%) | 28 (18.1%) | |
| II | 2 (5.9%) | 23 (14.8%) | |
| III | 12 (35.3%) | 48 (31.0%) | |
| IV | 18 (52.9%) | 56 (36.1%) | |
| Histology | 0.015 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 25 (73.5%) | 88 (56.8%) | |
| Small cell carcinoma | 7 (20.6%) | 25 (16.1%) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 (2.9%) | 37 (23.9%) | |
| Others | 1 (2.9%) | 5 (3.2%) | |
| EGFR mutation status | 0.09 | ||
| Yes | 5 | 29 | |
| No | 20 | 48 | |
| Chemotherapy | 0.18 | ||
| Yes | 19 (56%) | 67 (43%) | |
| No | 15 (44%) | 88 (57%) | |
| Complication | |||
| Stroke | 1 (2.9%) | 12 (7.7%) | 0.27 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 1 (2.9%) | 15 (9.7%) | 0.15 |
| Hypertension | 11 (32.4%) | 59 (38.1%) | 0.53 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (5.9%) | 21 (13.6%) | 0.18 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 (11.8%) | 22 (14.2%) | 0.70 |
| Use of antiplatelet drug | 2 (5.8%) | 18 (11.8%) | 0.28 |
| Tabacco use | 24 (70.6%) | 122 (78.7%) | 0.32 |
| Median time to the last evaluation from initial screening | 19 (3–96) | 19 (1–120) | 0.44* |
EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor
*Wilcoxon test
The relation between Fazekas grade and clinical characteristics
| PVH | p-Value | DSWH | p-Value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Total | 31 | 86 | 42 | 30 | 37 | 63 | 50 | 39 | ||
| Male sex | 21 (67.7%) | 56 (65.1%) | 26 (61.9%) | 21 (70.0%) | 0.90 | 25 (67.6%) | 44 (69.8%) | 29 (58.0%) | 26 (66.7%) | 0.61 |
| Median age (range) | 58.8 (29–75) | 64.8 (43–82) | 68.7 (45–79) | 75.3 (57–85) | <0.0001* | 59.9 (29–75) | 63.8 (42–82) | 68.2 (51–85) | 74.1 (57–85) | <0.0001* |
| Histology | 0.15 | 0.0299 | ||||||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 21 (18.6%) | 55 (48.7%) | 25 (22.1%) | 12 (10.6%) | 25 (22.1%) | 44 (38.9%) | 28 (24.8%) | 16 (14.2%) | ||
| Small cell carcinoma | 6 (18.8%) | 13 (40.6%) | 5 (15.6%) | 8 (25.0%) | 7 (21.9%) | 10 (31.3%) | 7 (21.9%) | 8 (25.0%) | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 3 (7.9%) | 16 (42.1%) | 9 (23.7%) | 10 (26.3%) | 4 (10.5%) | 9 (23.7%) | 11 (29.0%) | 14 (36.8%) | ||
| Others | 1 (16.7%) | 2 (33.3%) | 3 (50.0%) | 0 | 1 (16.7%) | 0 | 4 (66.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | ||
| EGFR mutation status | 0.89 | 0.80 | ||||||||
| Yes | 6 (17.7%) | 16 (47.1%) | 8 (23.5%) | 4 (11.8%) | 8 (23.5%) | 12 (35.3%) | 9 (26.5%) | 5 (14.7%) | ||
| No | 14 (20.6%) | 35 (51.5%) | 12 (17.7%) | 7 (10.3%) | 13 (19.1%) | 31 (45.9%) | 15 (22.1%) | 9 (13.2%) | ||
| Complication | ||||||||||
| Stroke | 0.0018 | 0.0027 | ||||||||
| Yes | 0 | 2 (15.4%) | 5 (38.5%) | 6 (46.2%) | 0 | 3 (23.1%) | 2 (15.4%) | 8 (61.5%) | ||
| No | 31 (17.6%) | 84 (47.7%) | 37 (21.0%) | 24 (13.6%) | 37 (21.0%) | 60 (34.1%) | 48 (27.3%) | 31 (17.6%) | ||
| Ischemic heart disease | 0.18 | 0.0335 | ||||||||
| Yes | 1 (6.3%) | 5 (31.3%) | 5 (31.3%) | 5 (21.3%) | 1 (6.3%) | 2 (12.5%) | 7 (43.8% | 6 (37.5%) | ||
| No | 30 (17.3%) | 81 (46.8%) | 37 (21.4%) | 25 (14.5%) | 36 (20.8%) | 61 (35.3%) | 43 (24.9%) | 33 (19.1%) | ||
| Hypertension | 0.0023 | |||||||||
| Yes | 7 (10.0%) | 28 (40.0%) | 15 (21.4%) | 20 (28.6%) | 0.0022 | 8 (11.4%) | 20 (28.6%) | 18 (25.7%) | 24 (34.3%) | |
| No | 24 (20.2%) | 58 (48.7%) | 27 (22.7%) | 10 (8.4%) | 29 (24.4%) | 43 (36.1%) | 32 (26.9%) | 15 (12.6%) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 0.0280 | |||||||||
| Yes | 1 (4.4%) | 11 (47.8%) | 5 (21.7%) | 6 (26.1%) | 0.20 | 1 (4.4%) | 5 (21.7%) | 10 (43.5%) | 7 (30.4%) | |
| No | 30 (18.1%) | 75 (45.2%) | 37 (22.3%) | 24 (14.5%) | 36 (21.7%) | 58 (34.9%) | 40 (24.1%) | 32 (19.3%) | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.79 | 0.26 | ||||||||
| Yes | 3 (11.5%) | 11 (42.3%) | 7 (26.9%) | 5 (19.2%) | 2 (7.7%) | 8 (30.8%) | 9 (34.6%) | 7 (26.9%) | ||
| No | 28 (17.2%) | 75 (46.0%) | 35 (21.5%) | 25 (15.3%) | 35 (21.5%) | 55 (33.7%) | 41 (25.2%) | 32 (19.6%) | ||
| Use of antiplatelet drug | 0.0008 | <0.0001 | ||||||||
| Yes | 0 | 5 (25.0%) | 7 (35.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 0 | 2 (10.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 10 (50.0%) | ||
| No | 31 (18.6%) | 79 (47.3%) | 35 (21.0%) | 22 (13.7%) | 37 (22.2%) | 60 (35.9%) | 41 (24.6%) | 29 (17.4%) | ||
| Tobacco use | 0.42 | 0.45 | ||||||||
| Yes | 25 (17.1%) | 65 (44.5%) | 30 (20.6%) | 26 (17.8%) | 30 (20.6%) | 47 (32.2%) | 36 (24.7%) | 33 (22.6%) | ||
| No | 6 (14.0%) | 21 (48.8%) | 12 (27.9%) | 4 (9.3%) | 7 (16.3%) | 16 (37.2%) | 14 (32.6%) | 6 (14.0%) | ||
| Number of brain metastasis | 0.75 | 0.69 | ||||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | ||
| 2–4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
| ≥5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | ||
PVH periventricular hyper-intensity, DSWH deep white matter hyperintense signals
*Wilcoxon test
Fig. 2Influence of leukoaraiosis grade on the incidence of brain metastases. a Distributions of the grades of periventricular hyperintensity and b deep white matter hyperintense signals. c Kaplan–Meier analysis of brain-metastases-free survival according to periventricular hyperintensity grade
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for occurrence of brain metastases
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Histology | |||
| Adenocarcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma | 9.34 | 1.80–171.77 | 0.0043 |
| Small cell carcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma | 8.82 | 1.39–172.44 | 0.0182 |
| Adenocarcinoma vs small cell carcinoma | 1.06 | 0.40–3.05 | 0.91 |
| PVH grade | |||
| 0 vs 1 | 3.48 | 1.37–9.00 | 0.0091 |
| 0 vs 2 | 8.62 | 2.37–41.87 | 0.0007 |
| 0 vs 3 | 3.60 | 1.02–15.04 | 0.0463 |
| 1 vs 2 | 2.48 | 0.74–11.37 | 0.15 |
| 1 vs 3 | 1.03 | 0.31–4.05 | 0.96 |
| 2 vs 3 | 0.42 | 0.07–2.14 | 0.29 |