| Literature DB >> 28752482 |
Alicja Laska1, Brian G Rector2, Lechosław Kuczyński3, Anna Skoracka3.
Abstract
Overwintering strategies in herbivorous mites (Acariformes: Eriophyoidea) are poorly understood. A study of two Abacarus spp. was conducted to compare body size parameters of adult females in different seasons. Mites of Abacarus n. sp. (under description) and A. lolli were sampled from Bromopsis inermis and Lolium perenne, respectively, in April, September and December of 2001 in Poznań, Poland; 21 morphological traits were measured for each specimen. A principal component analysis revealed significant differences in body size parameters between collection dates, with larger females collected in December in both species. Larger body size in winter is consistent with the hypothesis that mites of these species, for which deutogyny has not been observed, undergo physiological changes such as accumulation of nutritional reserves, that enable them to withstand adverse environmental conditions. Larger body size has also been shown in other invertebrates to reduce heat loss in cold conditions. Filling gaps in the current knowledge of eriophyoid overwintering strategies, whether in the presence or absence of deutogyny, will contribute to both basic and applied future studies of this important arthropod group.Entities:
Keywords: Eriophyoidea; Herbivores; Invertebrates; Phenotype
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28752482 PMCID: PMC5583266 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-017-0159-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Appl Acarol ISSN: 0168-8162 Impact factor: 2.132
Principal component analysis of the morphometric data, showing loadings of the first two PCA factors
| Trait | Comp.1 | Comp.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Length of body | 0.96 | 0.28 |
| Length of prodorsal shield | 0.06 | −0.06 |
| Width of prodorsal shield | 0.07 | −0.03 |
| Length of scapular setae | 0.06 | −0.03 |
| Distance between tubercles of setae | 0.05 | −0.06 |
| Length of setae | 0.15 | −0.01 |
| Length of setae | 0.14 | −0.01 |
| Length of setae | 0.11 | −0.02 |
| Length of setae | 0.04 | −0.06 |
| Length of female genitalia | 0.02 | −0.17 |
| Width of female genitalia | 0.02 | −0.16 |
| Length of genital setae 3 | 0.09 | −0.03 |
| Distance between genital tubercles | 0.02 | −0.12 |
| Distance between 1st tubercles of coxa | 0.02 | −0.31 |
| Distance between 2nd tubercles of coxa | 0.02 | −0.30 |
| Distance between tubercles of coxa | 0.03 | −0.07 |
| Length of setae 2 | 0.07 | −0.03 |
| Length of | 0.02 | −0.17 |
| Length of | 0.01 | −0.51 |
| Length of | 0.01 | −0.32 |
| Length of | 0.01 | −0.49 |
| %Variance explained (cumulative) | 70.8 | 89.7 |
MANOVA for PCA components 1 and 2 (for both species)
| Factor |
| Pillai’s trace | F | Numerator | Denominator |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month | 2 | 0.2436 | 12.1 | 4 | 348 | <0.0001 |
| Host | 1 | 0.8755 | 608.2 | 2 | 173 | <0.0001 |
| Month × host | 2 | 0.3846 | 20.7 | 4 | 348 | <0.0001 |
| Residuals | 174 |
MANOVA exposes significant effects of season, species and their interaction on mite morphology
Analysis of contrasts for the first principal component
| Linear hypotheses | Contrast | SE | t |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr.BI–Sep.BI = 0 | −1.91 | 5.90 | −0.32 | 0.9968 |
| Apr.BI–Dec.BI = 0 | −28.40 | 5.90 | −4.82 | <0.0001 |
| Sep.BI–Dec.BI = 0 | −26.49 | 5.90 | −4.49 | <0.0001 |
| Apr.LP–Sep.LP = 0 | −8.30 | 5.90 | −1.41 | 0.5625 |
| Apr.LP–Dec.LP = 0 | −29.10 | 5.90 | −4.93 | <0.0001 |
| Sep.LP–Dec.LP = 0 | −20.80 | 5.90 | −3.53 | 0.0031 |
Contrasts were calculated for groups defined by the month of mite collection (Apr, April; Sep, September; Dec, December) and mite species (BI, Abacarus n. sp.; LP, Abacarus lolii)
Fig. 1Means (horizontal lines), 95% prediction intervals (shaded regions), and raw values (points) for the first principal component (body size index) for Abacarus n. sp. and Abacarus lolii collected in April, September and December. Body size index in both species was significantly greater in December than in either April or September, whereas the differences between April and September were insignificant (p values for contrasts are given in the Table 3)
Analysis of contrasts for the second principal component
| Linear hypotheses | Contrast | SE | t |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr.BI–Sep.BI = 0 | −7.68 | 2.03 | −3.78 | 0.0012 |
| Apr.BI–Dec.BI = 0 | −15.75 | 2.03 | −7.76 | <0.0001 |
| Sep.BI–Dec.BI = 0 | −8.07 | 2.03 | −3.98 | <0.0001 |
| Apr.LP–Sep.LP = 0 | 7.30 | 2.03 | 3.60 | 0.0024 |
| Apr.LP–Dec.LP = 0 | 4.55 | 2.03 | 2.24 | 0.1296 |
| Sep.LP–Dec.LP = 0 | −2.75 | 2.03 | −1.35 | 0.5983 |
Contrasts were calculated for groups defined by the month of mite collection (Apr, April; Sep, September; Dec, December) and mite species (BI, Abacarus n. sp.; LP, Abacarus lolii)
Fig. 2Means (horizontal lines), 95% prediction intervals (shaded regions), and raw values (points) for the second principal component (body elongation index) for Abacarus n. sp. and Abacarus lolii collected in April, September and December. Values of this component increase throughout the year for Abacarus n. sp., while whereas the morphology of A. lolii differed significantly only between April and September (p values for respective contrasts are given in the Table 4)