Sam Manring1,2, L Christian Elledge3, Lisette W Swails4, Eric M Vernberg5. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, 1404 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. smanring@utk.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Room 301F, 1404 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. smanring@utk.edu. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, 1404 Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. 4. Center for Child Health and Human Development, University of Kansas, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MS 4003, Kansas City, KS, 66103, USA. 5. Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Dole Human Development Building, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 2015, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
Abstract
This study examined whether social preference was a mechanism that explained the relation between proactive and reactive aggression and peer victimization. Participants were 494 children in grades 2-5. Proactive and reactive aggression was assessed via a self-report measure and indices of social preference and peer victimization were assessed via a peer nomination inventory. Data was collected during the fall and spring of two academic years. The relations among aggression, social preference, and peer victimization varied as a function of aggression and gender. For girls, reactive aggression was a significant negative predictor of social preference. Findings also revealed social preference mediated the relation between reactive aggression and peer victimization for girls. This pathway did not hold for boys. There was some evidence that proactive aggression was negatively associated with peer victimization, but only for girls. Findings from the current study suggest social preference may be a key mechanism through which reactive aggression is associated with future victimization for girls. Boys' aggression was not related to subsequent peer victimization. Future research and intervention efforts should consider gender differences and the function of aggression when investigating children's peer victimization experiences.
This study examined whether social preference was a mechanism that explained the relation between proactive and reactive pan class="Disease">aggression and peer victimization. pan class="Species">Participants were 494 children in grades 2-5. Proactive and reactive aggression was assessed via a self-report measure and indices of social preference and peer victimization were assessed via a peer nomination inventory. Data was collected during the fall and spring of two academic years. The relations among aggression, social preference, and peer victimization varied as a function of aggression and gender. For girls, reactive aggression was a significant negative predictor of social preference. Findings also revealed social preference mediated the relation between reactive aggression and peer victimization for girls. This pathway did not hold for boys. There was some evidence that proactive aggression was negatively associated with peer victimization, but only for girls. Findings from the current study suggest social preference may be a key mechanism through which reactive aggression is associated with future victimization for girls. Boys' aggression was not related to subsequent peer victimization. Future research and intervention efforts should consider gender differences and the function of aggression when investigating children's peer victimization experiences.
Authors: Véronique Lamarche; Mara Brendgen; Michel Boivin; Frank Vitaro; Ginette Dionne; Daniel Pérusse Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2007-05-15
Authors: María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes; María Del Mar Molero Jurado; Ana Belén Barragán Martín; José Jesús Gázquez Linares Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alba Martin; José Manuel Muñoz; Paloma Braza; Rosa Ruiz-Ortiz; Nora Del Puerto-Golzarri; Eider Pascual-Sagastizábal; Aitziber Azurmendi; Rosario Carreras Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-02-26