PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate MRI-derived diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging in comparison with 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) PET with respect to diagnostic performance in tumor grading and outcome prediction in pediatric patients with diffuse astrocytic tumors (DAT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 26 children with histologically proven treatment naïve low and high grade DAT who underwent ASL and DWI performed within 2 weeks of 18F-DOPA PET. Relative ASL-derived cerebral blood flow max (rCBF max) and DWI-derived minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC min) were compared with 18F-DOPA uptake tumor/normal tissue (T/N) and tumor/striatum (T/S) ratios, and correlated with World Health Organization (WHO) tumor grade and progression-free survival (PFS). Statistics included Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, discriminant function analysis (DFA), Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and Cox analysis. RESULTS: A significant correlation was demonstrated between rCBF max, rADC min, and 18F-DOPA PET data (p < 0.001). Significant differences in terms of rCBF max, rADC min, and 18F-DOPA uptake were found between low- and high-grade DAT (p ≤ 0.001). ROC analysis and DFA demonstrated that T/S and T/N values were the best parameters for predicting tumor progression (AUC 0.93, p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, all diagnostic tools correlated with PFS (p ≤ 0.001); however, on multivariate analysis, only 18F-DOPA uptake remained significantly associated with outcome (p ≤ 0.03), while a trend emerged for rCBF max (p = 0.09) and rADC min (p = 0.08). The combination of MRI and PET data increased the predictive power for prognosticating tumor progression (AUC 0.97, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DWI, ASL and 18F-DOPA PET provide useful complementary information for pediatric DAT grading. 18F-DOPA uptake better correlates with PFS prediction. Combining MRI and PET data provides the highest predictive power for prognosticating tumor progression suggesting a synergistic role of these diagnostic tools.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate MRI-derived diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging in comparison with 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) PET with respect to diagnostic performance in tumor grading and outcome prediction in pediatric patients with diffuse astrocytic tumors (DAT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 26 children with histologically proven treatment naïve low and high grade DAT who underwent ASL and DWI performed within 2 weeks of 18F-DOPA PET. Relative ASL-derived cerebral blood flow max (rCBF max) and DWI-derived minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC min) were compared with 18F-DOPA uptake tumor/normal tissue (T/N) and tumor/striatum (T/S) ratios, and correlated with World Health Organization (WHO) tumor grade and progression-free survival (PFS). Statistics included Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman's rank correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, discriminant function analysis (DFA), Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and Cox analysis. RESULTS: A significant correlation was demonstrated between rCBF max, rADC min, and 18F-DOPA PET data (p < 0.001). Significant differences in terms of rCBF max, rADC min, and 18F-DOPA uptake were found between low- and high-grade DAT (p ≤ 0.001). ROC analysis and DFA demonstrated that T/S and T/N values were the best parameters for predicting tumor progression (AUC 0.93, p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, all diagnostic tools correlated with PFS (p ≤ 0.001); however, on multivariate analysis, only 18F-DOPA uptake remained significantly associated with outcome (p ≤ 0.03), while a trend emerged for rCBF max (p = 0.09) and rADC min (p = 0.08). The combination of MRI and PET data increased the predictive power for prognosticating tumor progression (AUC 0.97, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DWI, ASL and 18F-DOPA PET provide useful complementary information for pediatric DAT grading. 18F-DOPA uptake better correlates with PFS prediction. Combining MRI and PET data provides the highest predictive power for prognosticating tumor progression suggesting a synergistic role of these diagnostic tools.
Authors: Katherine A Zukotynski; Frederic H Fahey; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Sarah S Ng; Mehmet Kocak; Sridharan Gururangan; Larry E Kun; Tina Y Poussaint Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: K W Yeom; L A Mitchell; R M Lober; P D Barnes; H Vogel; P G Fisher; M S Edwards Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Peter Kan; James K Liu; Gary Hedlund; Douglas L Brockmeyer; Marion L Walker; John R W Kestle Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Sean J Hipp; Emilie A Steffen-Smith; Nicholas Patronas; Peter Herscovitch; Jeffrey M Solomon; Robyn S Bent; Seth M Steinberg; Katherine E Warren Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: M J van den Bent; J S Wefel; D Schiff; M J B Taphoorn; K Jaeckle; L Junck; T Armstrong; A Choucair; A D Waldman; T Gorlia; M Chamberlain; B G Baumert; M A Vogelbaum; D R Macdonald; D A Reardon; P Y Wen; S M Chang; A H Jacobs Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: V Dangouloff-Ros; A Tauziède-Espariat; C-J Roux; R Levy; D Grévent; F Brunelle; A Gareton; S Puget; K Beccaria; T Blauwblomme; J Grill; C Dufour; P Varlet; N Boddaert Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B Testud; G Brun; A Varoquaux; J F Hak; R Appay; A Le Troter; N Girard; J P Stellmann Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Zezhong Ye; Richard L Price; Xiran Liu; Joshua Lin; Qingsong Yang; Peng Sun; Anthony T Wu; Liang Wang; Rowland H Han; Chunyu Song; Ruimeng Yang; Sam E Gary; Diane D Mao; Michael Wallendorf; Jian L Campian; Jr-Shin Li; Sonika Dahiya; Albert H Kim; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lisbeth Marner; Michael Lundemann; Astrid Sehested; Karsten Nysom; Lise Borgwardt; René Mathiasen; Peder S Wehner; Otto M Henriksen; Carsten Thomsen; Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen; Helle Broholm; Olga Østrup; Julie L Forman; Liselotte Højgaard; Ian Law Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 12.300