Literature DB >> 28752193

Readmissions after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Mitsutoshi Kimura1, Kan Nawata2,3, Osamu Kinoshita2, Haruo Yamauchi2, Yasuhiro Hoshino2, Masaru Hatano4,5, Eisuke Amiya4, Koichi Kashiwa6, Miyoko Endo7, Yukie Kagami7, Mariko Nemoto7, Minoru Ono2.   

Abstract

Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy has improved the survival of patients with advanced heart failure. However, the readmission rate of CF-LVAD patients is still relatively high. A total of 90 patients who received CF-LVADs between April 2011 and March 2016 at our institute and were discharged home were analyzed retrospectively. They were followed up through March 2017. Clinical data, including frequency, length and etiology of readmission, were obtained from medical records. The mean observation period after initial discharge was 713 ± 322 days. In total, 73 patients (81%) had 236 readmissions, 214 unplanned and 22 planned. The overall and unplanned readmission rates were 1.34 and 1.22 per patient-year, respectively. The rate of freedom from unplanned first readmission at 1 year after initial discharge was 39%. The median interval between the previous hospital discharge and first and second readmissions was 311 and 213 days, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.117). The rate of readmission after more than three readmissions was significantly higher than that of first or second readmission (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The most common etiology of readmission was driveline infection (DLI) (36%), followed by stroke (9%). The median length of hospital stay due to DLI was 23 days. The patients with repeated unplanned readmissions had significantly lower EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire utility score than those with no or just one readmission. Readmission was common in CF-LVAD patients, and the most common etiology of readmissions was DLI. The interval to the next readmission seemed shorter for patients with repeated readmissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous flow; Driveline infection; Left ventricular assist device; Readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28752193     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-017-0975-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  33 in total

1.  Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takura; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryuji Tominaga; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Saito
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-19

3.  Cessation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Snehal R Patel; Kyung Taek Oh; Tolulope Ogriki; Daniel Sims; J Julia Shin; Shivank Madan; Omar Saeed; Daniel J Goldstein; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Readmissions Following Implantation of a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Matthew Da Silva; Jane MacIver; Marnie Rodger; Munira Jaffer; Sneha Raju; Filio Billia; Vivek Rao
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Central aortic valve closure successfully treated aortic insufficiency of the patient with Jarvik 2000 continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a case report.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Itoda; Kan Nawata; Haruo Yamauchi; Osamu Kinoshita; Mitsutoshi Kimura; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Yusuke Shimahara; Shunsuke Sato; Masanobu Yanase; Osamu Seguchi; Takuma Sato; Takeshi Nakatani; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-24

7.  Readmissions After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Differences Observed Between Two Contemporary Device Types.

Authors:  Nicholas A Haglund; Mary E Davis; Nicole M Tricarico; Mary E Keebler; Simon Maltais
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  DuraHeart™ magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device: Osaka University experience.

Authors:  Taichi Sakaguchi; Goro Matsumiya; Daisuke Yoshioka; Shigeru Miyagawa; Hiroyuki Nishi; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Shunsuke Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Midterm outcome of implantable left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation: Single-center experience in Japan.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Kimura; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Takashi Nishimura; Masaru Hatano; Teruhiko Imamura; Miyoko Endo; Yukie Kagami; Hitoshi Kubo; Koichi Kashiwa; Koichiro Kinugawa; Shunei Kyo; Issei Komuro; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Fontan-Like Hemodynamics Complicated With Ventricular Fibrillation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Daisuke Nitta; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Minoru Ono
Journal:  Int Heart J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 1.862

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2017: the year in review : Journal of Artificial Organs Editorial Committee.

Authors:  Y Sawa; G Matsumiya; K Matsuda; E Tatsumi; T Abe; K Fukunaga; S Ichiba; A Kishida; K Kokubo; T Masuzawa; A Myoui; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; T Nishinaka; E Okamoto; S Tokunaga; T Tomo; T Tsukiya; Y Yagi; T Yamaoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Relationship between muscle strength and rehospitalization in ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Kiyonori Kobayashi; Masato Mutsuga; Akihiko Usui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The analysis of unplanned readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge-to-transplant.

Authors:  Murat Sezgin; Murat Bülent Rabuş; Emre Selçuk; Özge Altaş; Sabit Sarıkaya; Mehmet Balkanay; Mehmet Kaan Kırali
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 0.332

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.