| Literature DB >> 28751922 |
Li Li1, Jianbo Yu2, Rui Mu2, Shuan Dong2.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of electroacupuncture at the Lieque, Chize, and Zusanli points in patients with lung injury caused by severe acute pancreatitis. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) were randomly divided into three groups based on the treatment: conventional therapy alone (group A), electroacupuncture of nonacupoints with conventional therapy (group B), and electroacupuncture at the Lieque (LU7), Chize (LU5), and Zusanli (ST36) points (group C) once a day for 5 days. Arterial blood samples were obtained for blood gas analysis before electroacupuncture (T1) and 3 (T2) and 5 (T3) days after electroacupuncture. The oxygenation index was significantly higher in all groups at T2 and T3 than that at T1, while the APACHE-II scores were decreased significantly. The expression of TNF-α was significantly decreased and the IL-10 was significantly increased in all groups at T3. The oxygenation index at T2 and T3 was significantly higher in group C than that in group B. Electroacupuncture at Lieque, Chize, and Zusanli can lessen the lung injury induced by SAP, and the mechanism may be related to the decreased TNF-α and increased IL-10 value. Clinical Registration Number is ChiCTR-ICR-15006850.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28751922 PMCID: PMC5511651 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3162851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flowchart about the group.
Figure 2Electroacupuncture was treated at Lieque (LU7) and Chize (LU5).
Figure 3Electroacupuncture was treated at Zusanli (ST36).
Figure 4Electroacupuncture of nonacupoints (one centimeter away from Lieque, Chize, and Zusanli points but different from the traditional Chinese medicine “Jing Luo”).
Comparison of various general indicators in the three patient groups ().
| Indices | Group A | Group B | Group C |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (cases, male/female) | 11/9 | 12/8 | 11/9 | 0.934 |
| Aged (years) | 54 ± 12 | 58 ± 12 | 57 ± 11 | 0.5333 |
| Body weight (kg) | 67.5 ± 10.5 | 70.6 ± 9.6 | 62.6 ± 13.6 | 0.0894 |
| PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg) | 203.2 ± 31.4 | 215.2 ± 42.7 | 181.3 ± 58.4 | 0.0661 |
| APACHE-II score | 17.9 ± 3.3 | 20.2 ± 3.1 | 19.3 ± 3.7 | 0.1038 |
Comparison of the differences in parameters when there is correlation between groups A and C ().
| Group A | Group C |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 16 ± 4 | 48 ± 8 | <0.0001 |
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 38 ± 3 | 85 ± 9 | <0.0001 |
| Difference in score | 1.4 ± 2.8 | 2.8 ± 1.8 | 0.0338 |
| Difference in score | 3.2 ± 1.5 | 6.1 ± 1.2 | <0.0001 |
| Plasma TNF- | 3.4 ± 2.8 | 12.1 ± 3.5 | <0.0001 |
| Plasma IL-10 | 4.8 ± 2.9 | 13.7 ± 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| BALF TNF- | 20.5 ± 5.3 | 25.6 ± 5.2 | 0.0020 |
| BALF IL-10 | 5.6 ± 4.2 | 22.8 ± 5.9 | <0.0001 |
Comparison of the differences in parameters when there is correlation between groups B and C ().
| Group B | Group C |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 17 ± 6 | 48 ± 8 | <0.0001 |
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 36 ± 5 | 85 ± 9 | <0.0001 |
| Difference in score | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 1.8 | 0.0338 |
| Difference in score | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 1.2 | <0.0001 |
| Plasma TNF- | 3.6 ± 1.9 | 12.1 ± 3.5 | <0.0001 |
| Plasma IL-10 | 5.1 ± 2.8 | 13.7 ± 3.8 | <0.0001 |
| BALF TNF- | 22.3 ± 4.9 | 25.6 ± 5.2 | 0.0020 |
| BALF IL-10 | 6.1 ± 2.4 | 22.8 ± 5.9 | <0.0001 |
Comparison of the parameters of groups A and B when there was a correlation between the groups ().
| Group A | Group B |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 16 ± 4 | 17 ± 6 | 0.2694 |
| Difference in the oxygenation index | 38 ± 3 | 36 ± 5 | 0.0667 |
| Difference in score | 1.4 ± 2.8 | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 0.4420 |
| Difference in score | 3.2 ± 1.5 | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 0.0922 |
| Plasma TNF- | 3.4 ± 2.8 | 3.6 ± 1.9 | 0.3965 |
| Plasma IL-10 | 4.8 ± 2.9 | 5.1 ± 2.8 | 0.3705 |
| BALF TNF- | 20.5 ± 5.3 | 22.3 ± 4.9 | 0.1359 |
| BALF IL-10 | 5.6 ± 4.2 | 6.1 ± 2.4 | 0.3233 |
Comparison of the differences in side effects of three groups (%).
| Group | Local pain | Local swollen | Local bleeding |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 (10%) | 2 (10%) | 1 (5%) |
| B | 3 (15%) | 3 (15%) | 2 (10%) |
| C | 2 (10%) | 2 (10%) | 1 (5%) |
|
| 0.851 | 0.851 | 0.765 |