Literature DB >> 28751814

Concept of Phase Cycling in Pulsed Magnetic Resonance Using Sinusoidal Magnetic Field Modulation.

Mark Tseytlin1,2,3.   

Abstract

In conventional pulsed magnetic resonance suppression of unwanted signals is achieved by changing pulse phases with respect to the reference signal and spin magnetization phase. This method is called phase cycling. An alternative approach is suggested to separate the unwanted signals from the spin echo by using magnetic field modulation. Precession frequency of the spins, and therefore phases of free indication decays and echo signals, can be controlled by the selection of modulation parameters. This enables phase cycling. Since the signal is detected in the presence of the changing magnetic field, which drives spin precession, the echo signal is frequency-modulated. Numerical transformation into an accelerating reference frame associated with the Larmor frequency restores the signal to a form that would have been observed in the absence of modulation. The suggested phase cycling method is analyzed in detail for the two pulse spin echo case.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28751814      PMCID: PMC5523863          DOI: 10.1515/zpch-2016-0843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Phys Chem (N F)        ISSN: 0942-9352            Impact factor:   2.408


  11 in total

1.  Multiphoton resonances in pulse EPR

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Applications of pi-photon-induced transparency in two-frequency pulse electron paramagnetic resonance experiments.

Authors:  Matvey Fedin; Moritz Kalin; Igor Gromov; Arthur Schweiger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  X-band rapid-scan EPR of nitroxyl radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Comparison of Continuous Wave, Spin Echo, and Rapid Scan EPR of Irradiated Fused Quartz.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Richard W Quine; Mark Tseitlin; Virginia Meyer; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  EPR moments for site-directed spin-labelling.

Authors:  Derek Marsh
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Comparison of pulse sequences for R1-based electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Deconvolution of sinusoidal rapid EPR scans.

Authors:  Mark Tseitlin; George A Rinard; Richard W Quine; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Electron dipole-dipole ESEEM in field-step ELDOR of nitroxide biradicals.

Authors:  L V Kulik; Yu A Grishin; S A Dzuba; I A Grigoryev; S V Klyatskaya; S F Vasilevsky; Yu D Tsvetkov
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Use of rapid-scan EPR to improve detection sensitivity for spin-trapped radicals.

Authors:  Deborah G Mitchell; Gerald M Rosen; Mark Tseitlin; Breanna Symmes; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Saturation recovery EPR and ELDOR at W-band for spin labels.

Authors:  Wojciech Froncisz; Theodore G Camenisch; Joseph J Ratke; James R Anderson; Witold K Subczynski; Robert A Strangeway; Jason W Sidabras; James S Hyde
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modular imaging system: Rapid scan EPR at 800 MHz.

Authors:  Oxana Tseytlin; Priyaankadevi Guggilapu; Andrey A Bobko; Hussien AlAhmad; Xuan Xu; Boris Epel; Ryan O'Connell; Emily H Hoblitzell; Timothy D Eubank; Valery V Khramtsov; Benoit Driesschaert; Eiad Kazkaz; Mark Tseytlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.229

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.