Literature DB >> 28750918

Susceptibilities of clinical Clostridium difficile isolates to antimicrobials: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies since 1970.

N Khanafer1, N Daneman2, T Greene3, A Simor2, P Vanhems4, M Samore5, K A Brown6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although exposure to antibiotics can cause Clostridium difficile infection, certain antibiotics are used to treat C. difficile. Measurements of antimicrobial C. difficile activity could help to identify antibiotic risk and emergent resistance. Here, we describe publication patterns relating to C. difficile susceptibilities and estimate minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for antibiotic classes in the published literature between January 1970 and June 2014.
METHODS: We queried PUBMED and EMBASE for studies reporting antibiotic C. difficile MIC in English or French. We used mixed-effects models to obtain pooled estimates of antibiotic class median MIC (MIC50), 90th percentile of MIC (MIC90), and MIC90:MIC50 ratio.
RESULTS: Our search identified 182 articles that met our inclusion criteria, of which 27 were retained for meta-analysis. Aminoglycosides (MIC50 120 mg/L, 95% CI 62-250), 3rd (MIC50 75 mg/L, 95% CI 39-130) and 2nd generation cephalosporins (MIC50 64 mg/L, 95% CI 27-140) had the least C. difficile activity. Rifamycins (MIC50 0.034 mg/L, 95% CI 0.012-0.099) and tetracyclines (MIC50 0.29 mg/L, 95% CI 0.054-1.7) had the highest level of activity. The activity of 3rd generation cephalosporins was more than three times lower than that of 1st generation agents (MIC50 19 mg/L, 95% CI 7.0-54). Time-trends in MIC50 were increasing for carbapenems (70% increase per 10 years) while decreasing for tetracyclines (51% decrease per 10 years).
CONCLUSIONS: We found a 3500-fold variation in antibiotic C. difficile MIC50, with aminoglycosides as the least active agents and rifamycins as the most active. Further research is needed to determine how in vitro measures can help assess patient C. difficile risk and guide antimicrobial stewardship.
Copyright © 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Clostridium difficile; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Strain; Susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28750918     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  5 in total

1.  Antibiotic Exposure and Risk for Hospital-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Brandon J Webb; Aruna Subramanian; Bert Lopansri; Bruce Goodman; Peter Bjorn Jones; Jeffrey Ferraro; Edward Stenehjem; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro activity of eravacycline against common ribotypes of Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Eugénie Bassères; Khurshida Begum; Chris Lancaster; Anne J Gonzales-Luna; Travis J Carlson; Julie Miranda; Tasnuva Rashid; M Jahangir Alam; David W Eyre; Mark H Wilcox; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  A species-wide genetic atlas of antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Korakrit Imwattana; César Rodríguez; Thomas V Riley; Daniel R Knight
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2021-11

4.  Global evolutionary dynamics and resistome analysis of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 017.

Authors:  Korakrit Imwattana; Papanin Putsathit; Deirdre A Collins; Teera Leepattarakit; Pattarachai Kiratisin; Thomas V Riley; Daniel R Knight
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2022-03

5.  A unique class of Zn2+-binding serine-based PBPs underlies cephalosporin resistance and sporogenesis in Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Michael D Sacco; Shaohui Wang; Swamy R Adapa; Xiujun Zhang; Eric M Lewandowski; Maura V Gongora; Dimitra Keramisanou; Zachary D Atlas; Julia A Townsend; Jean R Gatdula; Ryan T Morgan; Lauren R Hammond; Michael T Marty; Jun Wang; Prahathees J Eswara; Ioannis Gelis; Rays H Y Jiang; Xingmin Sun; Yu Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 17.694

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.