Literature DB >> 28750884

Predictive value of EEG in postanoxic encephalopathy: A quantitative model-based approach.

Evdokia Efthymiou1, Roland Renzel1, Christian R Baumann1, Rositsa Poryazova1, Lukas L Imbach2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The majority of comatose patients after cardiac arrest do not regain consciousness due to severe postanoxic encephalopathy. Early and accurate outcome prediction is therefore essential in determining further therapeutic interventions. The electroencephalogram is a standardized and commonly available tool used to estimate prognosis in postanoxic patients. The identification of pathological EEG patterns with poor prognosis relies however primarily on visual EEG scoring by experts. We introduced a model-based approach of EEG analysis (state space model) that allows for an objective and quantitative description of spectral EEG variability.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed standard EEG recordings in 83 comatose patients after cardiac arrest between 2005 and 2013 in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital Zürich. Neurological outcome was assessed one month after cardiac arrest using the Cerebral Performance Category. For a dynamic and quantitative EEG analysis, we implemented a model-based approach (state space analysis) to quantify EEG background variability independent from visual scoring of EEG epochs. Spectral variability was compared between groups and correlated with clinical outcome parameters and visual EEG patterns.
RESULTS: Quantitative assessment of spectral EEG variability (state space velocity) revealed significant differences between patients with poor and good outcome after cardiac arrest: Lower mean velocity in temporal electrodes (T4 and T5) was significantly associated with poor prognostic outcome (p<0.005) and correlated with independently identified visual EEG patterns such as generalized periodic discharges (p<0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed the predictive value of lower state space velocity for poor clinical outcome after cardiac arrest (AUC 80.8, 70% sensitivity, 15% false positive rate).
CONCLUSION: Model-based quantitative EEG analysis (state space analysis) provides a novel, complementary marker for prognosis in postanoxic encephalopathy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral hypoxia; Coma; Electroencephalography; Prognostication; Quantitative EEG; State-space model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28750884     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  EEG-based outcome prediction after cardiac arrest with convolutional neural networks: Performance and visualization of discriminative features.

Authors:  Stefan Jonas; Andrea O Rossetti; Mauro Oddo; Simon Jenni; Paolo Favaro; Frederic Zubler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Neurological Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest in the Era of Target Temperature Management.

Authors:  Maximiliano A Hawkes; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Recent applications of quantitative electroencephalography in adult intensive care units: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sung-Min Cho; Eva K Ritzl; Jaeho Hwang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  Categorization of post-cardiac arrest patients according to the pattern of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography after return of spontaneous circulation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Sugiyama; Kazuki Miyazaki; Takuto Ishida; Takahiro Tanabe; Yuichi Hamabe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marjolein M Admiraal; Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Christiaan R van Kaam; Hanneke M Keijzer; Michel J A M van Putten; Marcus J Schultz; Janneke Horn
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 10.422

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.