Literature DB >> 28750401

A Practical Approach to Tumor Heterogeneity in Clinical Research and Diagnostics.

Giorgio Stanta1, Serena Bonin.   

Abstract

This Pathobiology issue tries to better define the complex phenomenon of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), mostly from a practical point of view. This topic has been chosen because ITH is a central issue in tumor development and has to be investigated directly in patient tissue and immediately applied in the treatment of the presenting patient. Different types of ITH should be considered: clonal genetic and epigenetic evolution, morphological heterogeneity, and tumor sampling, heterogeneity resulting from microenvironmental autocrine and paracrine interaction, and stochastic plasticity related to different functional cell efficiencies. For a higher level of reproducibility in clinical research and diagnostics, it is necessary to establish standardized analytical methods, including microdissection. In situ techniques can be pivotal to explore tumor microenvironment and can be improved with associated digital analysis. Liquid biopsies for plasma DNA analysis are at present the best method to study recurrent tumors with treatment adaptation, and widespread clinical use could be beneficial. The different types of tumor genomic instabilities could have pragmatic applications to rank ITH for clinical applications: treatment approaches differ in patients with a high nucleotide mutation rate and patients with high copy number alterations.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer spreading; Functional phenotypic plasticity; Genetic/epigenetic heterogeneity; Genomic instability; Intratumor heterogeneity; Morphological heterogeneity; Stochastic plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28750401     DOI: 10.1159/000477813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathobiology        ISSN: 1015-2008            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

Review 1.  Overview on Clinical Relevance of Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Giorgio Stanta; Serena Bonin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-06

2.  A systematic review of the prevalence of DNA damage response gene mutations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shona H Lang; Stephanie L Swift; Heath White; Kate Misso; Jos Kleijnen; Ruben G W Quek
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 3.  Precision Oncology Beyond Genomics: The Future Is Here-It Is Just Not Evenly Distributed.

Authors:  Ulrike Pfohl; Alina Pflaume; Manuela Regenbrecht; Sabine Finkler; Quirin Graf Adelmann; Christoph Reinhard; Christian R A Regenbrecht; Lena Wedeken
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Chromosome Instability; Implications in Cancer Development, Progression, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Raghvendra Vishwakarma; Kirk J McManus
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  The therapeutic and prognostic implications of molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Wun-Jae Kim; Seok Joong Yun
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.