Johannes Wendsche1, Argang Ghadiri2, Amelie Bengsch3, Jürgen Wegge3. 1. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: wendsche.johannes@baua.bund.de. 2. Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, St. Augustin, Germany. 3. TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To prevent an accumulation of strain during work and to reduce error risk, many countries have made rest breaks mandatory. In the nursing literature, insufficient rest break organization is often reported. However, the outcomes of nurses' rest break organization and its anteceding factors are less clear. DATA SOURCES: We searched for academic literature on nurses' rest break organization in electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, CINAHL). REVIEW METHODS: Our search yielded 93 potentially relevant articles published between 01/1990 and 04/2016. The final sample in our scoping review consisted of 36 publications and included data from 35 independent and international study samples and two reviews. RESULTS: Several studies reported a high prevalence of missed, interrupted, or delayed rest breaks in nursing. Nurses' rest breaks often related to better physical and mental well-being but did not affect motivational outcomes and performance systematically. Results on the effects of napping breaks were inconsistent. Rest break activities and high quality rest break areas are further factors that relieve nurses from job demands and can be helpful in coping with them. Several study results indicated that temporal and quantitative work demands, job resources, and individual characteristics influence rest break organization. However, most of these findings stem from studies that do not allow causal conclusions to be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed rest breaks influence nurses' occupational well-being and behavior positively. However, the mechanisms and moderating break-, work-, and person-related factors involved in producing these effects are not well understood today. Thus, further theory building and stronger empirical data are needed.
OBJECTIVES: To prevent an accumulation of strain during work and to reduce error risk, many countries have made rest breaks mandatory. In the nursing literature, insufficient rest break organization is often reported. However, the outcomes of nurses' rest break organization and its anteceding factors are less clear. DATA SOURCES: We searched for academic literature on nurses' rest break organization in electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, PsycArticles, PsycINFO, CINAHL). REVIEW METHODS: Our search yielded 93 potentially relevant articles published between 01/1990 and 04/2016. The final sample in our scoping review consisted of 36 publications and included data from 35 independent and international study samples and two reviews. RESULTS: Several studies reported a high prevalence of missed, interrupted, or delayed rest breaks in nursing. Nurses' rest breaks often related to better physical and mental well-being but did not affect motivational outcomes and performance systematically. Results on the effects of napping breaks were inconsistent. Rest break activities and high quality rest break areas are further factors that relieve nurses from job demands and can be helpful in coping with them. Several study results indicated that temporal and quantitative work demands, job resources, and individual characteristics influence rest break organization. However, most of these findings stem from studies that do not allow causal conclusions to be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: Well-designed rest breaks influence nurses' occupational well-being and behavior positively. However, the mechanisms and moderating break-, work-, and person-related factors involved in producing these effects are not well understood today. Thus, further theory building and stronger empirical data are needed.
Authors: André Scholz; Johannes Wendsche; Argang Ghadiri; Usha Singh; Theo Peters; Stefan Schneider Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Natascha Mojtahedzadeh; Elisabeth Rohwer; Felix Alexander Neumann; Albert Nienhaus; Matthias Augustin; Birgit-Christiane Zyriax; Volker Harth; Stefanie Mache Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yi-Chuan Chen; Yue-Liang Leon Guo; Li-Chan Lin; Yu-Ju Lee; Pei-Yi Hu; Jiune-Jye Ho; Judith Shu-Chu Shiao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lara Guedes de Pinho; Francisco Sampaio; Carlos Sequeira; Laetitia Teixeira; César Fonseca; Manuel José Lopes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-27 Impact factor: 3.390