IMPORTANCE: Accumulating evidence indicates that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with clinical outcomes and may predict the efficacy of chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, encoded by the gene ERBB2)-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of TILs, particularly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, in the prediction of outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer randomized to an antibody-based (trastuzumab) vs a small molecule-based (lapatinib) anti-HER2 therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.31 phase 3 clinical trial accrued patients from 21 countries and randomized 652 with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer to receive trastuzumab or lapatinib, in combination with a taxane, from January 17, 2008, through December 1, 2011. Patients had received no prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic setting. The median follow-up was 21.5 months (interquartile range, 14.3-31.0). The tumor tissue collected for primary diagnosis was used in this ad hoc substudy. Sections were scored for TILs on hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed to assess CD8, FOXP3, CD56, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression on stromal (sTILs) and intratumoral TILs. Data were analyzed from July 15, 2015, through July 27, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with trastuzumab or lapatinib in combination with taxane chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prognostic effects of biomarkers were evaluated for progression-free survival by stratified univariate log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier curves and by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression; predictive effects were examined with a test of interaction between treatment allocation and biomarker classification. RESULTS: Of the 647 treated women (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [10.8] years), 614 had tumor tissue samples scored for H&E sTILs and 427 for CD8 biomarker assessments. Overall H&E sTIL counts of greater than 5% (high) were present in 215 cases (35%) but did not show significant prognostic or predictive effects. Univariate stratified analyses detected a significant predictive effect on risk for progression with lapatinib compared with trastuzumab among patients with low CD8+ sTIL counts (observed hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.40-6.17; P = .003) and among those with high CD8+ sTIL counts (observed hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.75; P = .02), confirmed in stepwise multivariate analysis (interaction P = .04). Other immunohistochemistry biomarkers were not associated with prognostic or predictive effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, a low level of preexisting cytotoxic sTILs predicted the most benefit from an antibody- vs a small molecule-based drug against the same target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00667251.
IMPORTANCE: Accumulating evidence indicates that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with clinical outcomes and may predict the efficacy of chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, encoded by the gene ERBB2)-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of TILs, particularly cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, in the prediction of outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer randomized to an antibody-based (trastuzumab) vs a small molecule-based (lapatinib) anti-HER2 therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.31 phase 3 clinical trial accrued patients from 21 countries and randomized 652 with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer to receive trastuzumab or lapatinib, in combination with a taxane, from January 17, 2008, through December 1, 2011. Patients had received no prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic setting. The median follow-up was 21.5 months (interquartile range, 14.3-31.0). The tumor tissue collected for primary diagnosis was used in this ad hoc substudy. Sections were scored for TILs on hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed to assess CD8, FOXP3, CD56, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) expression on stromal (sTILs) and intratumoral TILs. Data were analyzed from July 15, 2015, through July 27, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with trastuzumab or lapatinib in combination with taxane chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prognostic effects of biomarkers were evaluated for progression-free survival by stratified univariate log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier curves and by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression; predictive effects were examined with a test of interaction between treatment allocation and biomarker classification. RESULTS: Of the 647 treated women (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [10.8] years), 614 had tumor tissue samples scored for H&E sTILs and 427 for CD8 biomarker assessments. Overall H&E sTIL counts of greater than 5% (high) were present in 215 cases (35%) but did not show significant prognostic or predictive effects. Univariate stratified analyses detected a significant predictive effect on risk for progression with lapatinib compared with trastuzumab among patients with low CD8+ sTIL counts (observed hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.40-6.17; P = .003) and among those with high CD8+ sTIL counts (observed hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.75; P = .02), confirmed in stepwise multivariate analysis (interaction P = .04). Other immunohistochemistry biomarkers were not associated with prognostic or predictive effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, a low level of preexisting cytotoxic sTILs predicted the most benefit from an antibody- vs a small molecule-based drug against the same target. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00667251.
Authors: R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: John Stagg; Sherene Loi; Upulie Divisekera; Shin Foong Ngiow; Helene Duret; Hideo Yagita; Michele W Teng; Mark J Smyth Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Edith A Perez; Karla V Ballman; Kathy S Tenner; E Aubrey Thompson; Sunil S Badve; Helen Bailey; Frederick L Baehner Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Luen; Roberto Salgado; Stephen Fox; Peter Savas; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Emma Clark; Astrid Kiermaier; Sandra M Swain; Jose Baselga; Stefan Michiels; Sherene Loi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: H R Ali; E Provenzano; S-J Dawson; F M Blows; B Liu; M Shah; H M Earl; C J Poole; L Hiller; J A Dunn; S J Bowden; C Twelves; J M S Bartlett; S M A Mahmoud; E Rakha; I O Ellis; S Liu; D Gao; T O Nielsen; P D P Pharoah; C Caldas Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Khalid El Bairi; Harry R Haynes; Elizabeth Blackley; Susan Fineberg; Jeffrey Shear; Sophia Turner; Juliana Ribeiro de Freitas; Daniel Sur; Luis Claudio Amendola; Masoumeh Gharib; Amine Kallala; Indu Arun; Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan; Luciana Fujimoto; Luz F Sua; Shi-Wei Liu; Huang-Chun Lien; Pawan Kirtani; Marcelo Balancin; Hicham El Attar; Prerna Guleria; Wenxian Yang; Emad Shash; I-Chun Chen; Veronica Bautista; Jose Fernando Do Prado Moura; Bernardo L Rapoport; Carlos Castaneda; Eunice Spengler; Gabriela Acosta-Haab; Isabel Frahm; Joselyn Sanchez; Miluska Castillo; Najat Bouchmaa; Reena R Md Zin; Ruohong Shui; Timothy Onyuma; Wentao Yang; Zaheed Husain; Karen Willard-Gallo; An Coosemans; Edith A Perez; Elena Provenzano; Paula Gonzalez Ericsson; Eduardo Richardet; Ravi Mehrotra; Sandra Sarancone; Anna Ehinger; David L Rimm; John M S Bartlett; Giuseppe Viale; Carsten Denkert; Akira I Hida; Christos Sotiriou; Sibylle Loibl; Stephen M Hewitt; Sunil Badve; William Fraser Symmans; Rim S Kim; Giancarlo Pruneri; Shom Goel; Prudence A Francis; Gloria Inurrigarro; Rin Yamaguchi; Hernan Garcia-Rivello; Hugo Horlings; Said Afqir; Roberto Salgado; Sylvia Adams; Marleen Kok; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Stefan Michiels; Sandra Demaria; Sherene Loi Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Santiago Moragon; Cristina Hernando; Maria Teresa Martinez-Martinez; Marta Tapia; Belen Ortega-Morillo; Ana Lluch; Begoña Bermejo; Juan Miguel Cejalvo Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Igor L Gomes-Santos; Zohreh Amoozgar; Ashwin S Kumar; William W Ho; Kangsan Roh; Nilesh P Talele; Hannah Curtis; Kosuke Kawaguchi; Rakesh K Jain; Dai Fukumura Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Elisabeth S Stovgaard; Karama Asleh; Nazia Riaz; Samuel Leung; Dongxia Gao; Lise B Nielsen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Eva Balslev; Maj-Britt Jensen; Dorte Nielsen; T O Nielsen Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Oleg Gluz; Fred Heinisch; Friedrich Feuerhake; Hans Kreipe; Michael Clemens; Benno Nuding; Wolfram Malter; Toralf Reimer; Rachel Wuerstlein; Monika Graeser; Steve Shak; Ulrike Nitz; Ronald Kates; Matthias Christgen; Nadia Harbeck Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 6.466