Literature DB >> 28750109

Comparison of Fixed Dental Prostheses with Zirconia and Metal Frameworks: Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Irena Sailer, Marc Balmer, Jürg Hüsler, Christoph Hans Franz Hämmerle, Sarah Känel, Daniel Stefan Thoma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test whether posterior zirconia-ceramic (ZC) and metal-ceramic (MC) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) exhibit similar survival and technical/biologic complication rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 58 patients in need of 76 posterior FDPs were randomly assigned to receive 40 ZC and 36 MC FDPs. The restorations were examined at baseline (cementation) and yearly for 5 years. Technical and biologic outcomes were compared. The independent treatment groups were compared with nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for metric variables and with Fisher exact test for categoric data.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients with 40 ZC and 29 MC FDPs were examined at 5 years. No FDP failed during the 5 years; 2 ZC FDPs failed at 65.4 and 73.3 months. Debonding occurred at 3 ZC FDPs. Technical outcomes (modified US Public Health Service criteria) and general periodontal parameters did not show significant differences between ZC and MC FDPs.
CONCLUSION: ZC FDPs exhibited similar outcomes to MC FDPs based on 5-year survival estimates. The majority of technical and biologic outcome measures were not significantly different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28750109     DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  6 in total

1.  Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Maren Teichmann; Anna Lena Wienert; Marcia Rückbeil; Volker Weber; Stefan Wolfart; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Do tooth-supported zirconia restorations present more technical failures related to fracture or loss of retention? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Paula Pontes Garcia; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Fernanda Harumi Oku Prochnow; Luciano Madeira; Paulo Francisco Cesar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Fernando Zarone; Maria Irene Di Mauro; Pietro Ausiello; Gennaro Ruggiero; Roberto Sorrentino
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up.

Authors:  Paula Pontevedra; Carlos Lopez-Suarez; Veronica Rodriguez; Jesus Pelaez; Maria J Suarez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  Patient-centered rehabilitation of single, partial, and complete edentulism with cemented- or screw-retained fixed dental prosthesis: The First Osstem Advanced Dental Implant Research and Education Center Consensus Conference 2017.

Authors:  Marco Tallarico; Marco Caneva; Nicola Baldini; Fulvio Gatti; Marco Duvina; Mauro Billi; Gaetano Iannello; Giacomo Piacentini; Silvio Mario Meloni; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 6.  Periodontal Behavior Around Teeth Prepared with Finishing Line for Restoration with Fixed Prostheses. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Raquel León-Martínez; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Eduardo Selva-Otaolaurruchi; Rubén Agustín-Panadero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.