Literature DB >> 28749899

Effect of Donor and Recipient Diabetes Status on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Adherence and Survival.

Marianne O Price1, Marek Lisek, Matthew T Feng, Francis W Price.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether donor and/or recipient diabetes status affects the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
METHODS: A consecutive, single-center DMEK case series was reviewed. The outcome measures were success of surgeon tissue preparation, air reinjection rate, Kaplan-Meier 4-year graft replacement/failure rate for any reason, and endothelial cell loss.
RESULTS: The donor had a history of diabetes in 504 of 1791 cases (28%) and the recipient in 14%. For donors without and with diabetes, the preparation success rate was 99% versus 95% (P < 0.0001), the air reinjection rate was 16% versus 18% (P = 0.19), and the 4-year graft replacement/failure rate was 7% versus 9%, respectively (P = 0.15). Endothelial cell loss was not associated with donor diabetes (P = 0.76). For recipients without and with diabetes, the 4-year graft replacement/failure rate was 7% versus 9% (P = 0.68), and median endothelial cell loss increased from 27% versus 29% at 1 month to 42% versus 48% at 4 years, respectively (P = 0.02). Recipient use of insulin therapy was associated with poorer graft attachment and a higher air reinjection rate (P = 0.0023).
CONCLUSIONS: Although donor diabetes was associated with a 5-fold increased risk of tissue preparation failure, it was not significantly associated with air reinjection, graft survival, or endothelial cell loss. This provides reassurance that tissue prepared successfully from donors with diabetes is safe to use for DMEK. Recipient diabetes was associated with increased endothelial cell loss; the potential effect on longer-term graft survival merits further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28749899     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

Review 1.  [10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

Authors:  M Matthaei; S Schrittenlocher; D Hos; S Siebelmann; F Bucher; F Schaub; R Hoerster; R Siggel; S Roters; L M Heindl; B Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Pseudophakic corneal donor tissue in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): implications for cornea banks and surgeons.

Authors:  Daniel Pilger; Necip Torun; Anna-Karina B Maier; Jan Schroeter
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-23

5.  Proteomic analysis of corneal endothelial cell-descemet membrane tissues reveals influence of insulin dependence and disease severity in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jessica M Skeie; Benjamin T Aldrich; Andrew S Goldstein; Gregory A Schmidt; Cynthia R Reed; Mark A Greiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  DMEK outcomes using nondiabetic grafts for recipients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ben J Janson; Daniel C Terveen; Matthew J Benage; M Bridget Zimmerman; David C Mixon; Benjamin T Aldrich; Jessica M Skeie; Gregory A Schmidt; Cynthia R Reed; Kenneth M Goins; Mark A Greiner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 7.  The Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study (COMEDOS) - design and review of the influence of donor characteristics on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcome.

Authors:  Silvia Schrittenlocher; Mario Matthaei; Björn Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Ability of routinely collected clinical factors to predict good visual results after primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Florian Bloch; Vincent Dinot; Christophe Goetz; Yinka Zevering; Louis Lhuillier; Jean-Marc Perone
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 9.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis.

Authors:  Stephan Ong Tone; Viridiana Kocaba; Myriam Böhm; Adam Wylegala; Tomas L White; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 21.198

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.