Wenyi Zhang1, Huifang Li1, Xingxing Chen1, Meng Su1, Ruifang Lin2, Changlin Zou1. 1. 1 Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China. 2. 2 Department of Cancer Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A Phase II study was designed to test the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a modified target volumes delineation method for inoperable oesophageal cancer patients. METHODS: All eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The method of delineating target volume is as follows: Planning gross target volume (PGTV) was defined as the primary gross tumour volume (GTV-t) plus a 3 cm margin longitudinally and a 0.5 cm margin circumferentially, and positive lymph nodes(GTV-n) plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions. Clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as PGTV plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions and elective nodal region. Planning target volume (PTV) was defined as CTV plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions. The dose of PGTV is 54-60 Gy in 27-30 fractions(2Gy per fraction). The dose of PTV is 48.6-54 Gy in 27-30 fractions(1.8Gy per fraction). The regimen consists of paclitaxel135 mgm-2 on 1 day and DDP 25 mgm-2 on 3 days per 3 weeks. The patients received 2 cycles of chemotherapy during radiotherapy and 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy after radiotherapy. RESULTS: 34 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up time was 20.9 months (range: 3.7-28.4 months) for all patients. The 1- and 2-year survival rates for all patients were 70.5 and 44.1%, respectively. Clinical complete response was observed in 21 patients(61.8%), cPR was observed in 9 patients(26.5%) and cSD was observed in 4 patients(11.7%). CONCLUSION: This modified method with concurrent chemotherapy could achieve better locoregional control rate. The 1- and 2-year survival rates of this method were close to the survival rates of the current methods widely adopted. Advances in knowledge: The modified target volumes delineation method can enhance locoregional control rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: A Phase II study was designed to test the safety and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a modified target volumes delineation method for inoperable oesophageal cancerpatients. METHODS: All eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The method of delineating target volume is as follows: Planning gross target volume (PGTV) was defined as the primary gross tumour volume (GTV-t) plus a 3 cm margin longitudinally and a 0.5 cm margin circumferentially, and positive lymph nodes(GTV-n) plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions. Clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as PGTV plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions and elective nodal region. Planning target volume (PTV) was defined as CTV plus a 0.5 cm margin in all directions. The dose of PGTV is 54-60 Gy in 27-30 fractions(2Gy per fraction). The dose of PTV is 48.6-54 Gy in 27-30 fractions(1.8Gy per fraction). The regimen consists of paclitaxel135 mgm-2 on 1 day and DDP 25 mgm-2 on 3 days per 3 weeks. The patients received 2 cycles of chemotherapy during radiotherapy and 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy after radiotherapy. RESULTS: 34 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up time was 20.9 months (range: 3.7-28.4 months) for all patients. The 1- and 2-year survival rates for all patients were 70.5 and 44.1%, respectively. Clinical complete response was observed in 21 patients(61.8%), cPR was observed in 9 patients(26.5%) and cSD was observed in 4 patients(11.7%). CONCLUSION: This modified method with concurrent chemotherapy could achieve better locoregional control rate. The 1- and 2-year survival rates of this method were close to the survival rates of the current methods widely adopted. Advances in knowledge: The modified target volumes delineation method can enhance locoregional control rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Authors: David H Ilson; Bruce D Minsky; Geoffrey Y Ku; Valerie Rusch; Nabil Rizk; Manish Shah; David P Kelsen; Marinela Capanu; Laura Tang; Jenny Campbell; Manjit Bains Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J S Cooper; M D Guo; A Herskovic; J S Macdonald; J A Martenson; M Al-Sarraf; R Byhardt; A H Russell; J J Beitler; S Spencer; S O Asbell; M V Graham; L L Leichman Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael B Tomblyn; Bryan H Goldman; Charles R Thomas; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Vivek Mehta; Thaddeus Beeker; Philip J Gold; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Bruce D Minsky; Thomas F Pajak; Robert J Ginsberg; Thomas M Pisansky; James Martenson; Ritsuko Komaki; Gordon Okawara; Seth A Rosenthal; David P Kelsen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael R Button; Carys A Morgan; Elizabeth S Croydon; S Ashley Roberts; Thomas D L Crosby Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas Crosby; Christopher N Hurt; Stephen Falk; Simon Gollins; Somnath Mukherjee; John Staffurth; Ruby Ray; Nadim Bashir; John A Bridgewater; J Ian Geh; David Cunningham; Jane Blazeby; Rajarshi Roy; Tim Maughan; Gareth Griffiths Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 41.316