Literature DB >> 28748564

Medicare Spending for Breast, Prostate, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients in the Year of Diagnosis and Year of Death.

Christopher T Chen1, Ling Li2, Gabriel Brooks2, Michael Hassett2, Deborah Schrag2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize spending patterns for Medicare patients with incident breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING/STUDY
DESIGN: 2007-2012 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program linked with Medicare fee-for-service claims. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We calculate per-patient monthly and yearly mean and median expenditures, by cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and spending category, over the years of diagnosis and death. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Over the year of diagnosis, mean spending was $35,849, $26,295, $55,597, and $63,063 for breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over the year of death, spending was similar across different cancer types and stage at diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Characterization of Medicare spending according to clinically meaningful categories may assist development of oncology alternative payment models and cost-effectiveness models. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Oncology; alternative payment model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748564      PMCID: PMC6051983          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  17 in total

1.  Projecting the number of patients with colorectal carcinoma by phases of care in the US: 2000-2020.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Eric J Feuer; Roberta De Angelis; Martin Brown
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Oncology Care Model: Short- and Long-Term Considerations in the Context of Broader Payment Reform.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Clough; Arif H Kamal
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Medicare innovation center oncology care model: a toe in the water when a plunge is needed.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Harold D Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; Ling Li; Dhruv B Sharma; Jane C Weeks; Michael J Hassett; K Robin Yabroff; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Jennifer Lund; Deanna Kepka; Angela Mariotto
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Changing physician incentives for affordable, quality cancer care: results of an episode payment model.

Authors:  Lee N Newcomer; Bruce Gould; Ray D Page; Sheila A Donelan; Monica Perkins
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Laurel Borowski; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

8.  Acute hospital care is the chief driver of regional spending variation in Medicare patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; Ling Li; Hajime Uno; Michael J Hassett; Bruce E Landon; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; J D Lubitz; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Cost of care for cancer in a health maintenance organization.

Authors:  B H Fireman; C P Quesenberry; C P Somkin; A S Jacobson; D Baer; D West; A L Potosky; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1997
View more
  4 in total

1.  Spending for Advanced Cancer Diagnoses: Comparing Recurrent Versus De Novo Stage IV Disease.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Matthew Banegas; Hajime Uno; Shicheng Weng; Angel M Cronin; Maureen O'Keeffe Rosetti; Nikki M Carroll; Mark C Hornbrook; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Assessing Suitability of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Oman.

Authors:  Mohammed Fayyadh Bondre; Murtadha Al Qubtan; Salim O Al Harthy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  A Network Pharmacology-Based Study on the Anti-Lung Cancer Effect of Dipsaci Radix.

Authors:  Jiayan Wu; Shengkun Hong; Xiankuan Xie; Wangmi Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Vitamin D supplementation to the older adult population in Germany has the cost-saving potential of preventing almost 30 000 cancer deaths per year.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Thomas Gredner; Sabine Kuznia; Ben Schöttker; Ute Mons; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.