Literature DB >> 28748535

Financial Incentives and Physician Practice Participation in Medicare's Value-Based Reforms.

Adam A Markovitz1,2, Patricia P Ramsay3, Stephen M Shortell3, Andrew M Ryan2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether greater experience and success with performance incentives among physician practices are related to increased participation in Medicare's voluntary value-based payment reforms. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Publicly available data from Medicare's Physician Compare (n = 1,278; January 2012 to November 2013) and nationally representative physician practice data from the National Survey of Physician Organizations 3 (NSPO3; n = 907,538; 2013). STUDY
DESIGN: We used regression analysis to examine practice-level relationships between prior exposure to performance incentives and participation in key Medicare value-based payment reforms: accountable care organization (ACO) programs, the Physician Quality Reporting System ("Physician Compare"), and the Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology program ("Meaningful Use"). Prior experience and success with financial incentives were measured as (1) the percentage of practices' revenue from financial incentives for quality or efficiency; and (2) practices' exposure to public reporting of quality measures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We linked physician participation data from Medicare's Physician Compare to the NSPO3 survey. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: There was wide variation in practices' exposure to performance incentives, with 64 percent exposed to financial incentives, 45 percent exposed to public reporting, and 2.2 percent of practice revenue coming from financial incentives. For each percentage-point increase in financial incentives, there was a 0.9 percentage-point increase in the probability of participating in ACOs (standard error [SE], 0.1, p < .001) and a 0.8 percentage-point increase in the probability of participating in Meaningful Use (SE, 0.1, p < .001), controlling for practice characteristics. Financial incentives were not associated with participation in Physician Compare. Among ACO participants, a 1 percentage-point increase in incentives was associated with a 0.7 percentage-point increase in the probability of being "very well" prepared to utilize cost and quality data (SE, 0.1, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians organizations' prior experience and success with performance incentives were related to participation in Medicare ACO arrangements and participation in the meaningful use criteria but not to participation in Physician Compare. We conclude that Medicare must complement financial incentives with additional efforts to address the needs of practices with less experience with such incentives to promote value-based payment on a broader scale. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Financial incentives; Medicare; accountable care organizations; physician practices; value-based payment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748535      PMCID: PMC6056599          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  25 in total

Review 1.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.

Authors:  Lynda C Burton; Gerard F Anderson; Irvin W Kues
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Stakeholder-Driven Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Update From PCORI.

Authors:  Joseph V Selby; Laura Forsythe; Harold C Sox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Strong versus Weak Incentives: The Role of Policy, Management, and Theory in a New Research Agenda.

Authors:  Sherry Glied
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Effect of pay-for-performance incentives on quality of care in small practices with electronic health records: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Naomi S Bardach; Jason J Wang; Samantha F De Leon; Sarah C Shih; W John Boscardin; L Elizabeth Goldman; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Grading a physician's value--the misapplication of performance measurement.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Deborah R Kaye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Choosing wisely--the politics and economics of labeling low-value services.

Authors:  Nancy E Morden; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  More Than Money: Motivating Physician Behavior Change in Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  Madeleine Phipps-Taylor; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Ten strategies to lower costs, improve quality, and engage patients: the view from leading health system CEOs.

Authors:  Delos M Cosgrove; Michael Fisher; Patricia Gabow; Gary Gottlieb; George C Halvorson; Brent C James; Gary S Kaplan; Jonathan B Perlin; Robert Petzel; Glenn D Steele; John S Toussaint
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Do primary care physicians treating minority patients report problems delivering high-quality care?

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Ann S O'Malley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  3 in total

1.  Practices Caring For The Underserved Are Less Likely To Adopt Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Jeffrey Souza; J Michael McWilliams; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program After Accounting for Nonrandom Exit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; John M Hollingsworth; John Z Ayanian; Edward C Norton; Phyllis L Yan; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Casey P Balio; Nate C Apathy; Robin L Danek
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.