| Literature DB >> 28748455 |
Akimitsu Tanio1, Hiroaki Saito2, Keigo Ashida1, Shouichi Urushibara1, Manabu Yamamoto1, Naruo Tokuyasu1, Teruhisa Sakamoto1, Soichiro Honjo1, Yoshihiko Maeta1, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) resembling submucosal tumor (SMT; CRC/SMT) is very rare. Because its biopsy is challenging, accurate preoperative diagnosis is also very rare. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy; Submucosal tumor
Year: 2017 PMID: 28748455 PMCID: PMC5529306 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-017-0362-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1a CT colonoscopy revealed extrinsic compression of rectum. b Coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed 4-cm low-intensity tumor between rectum and sacrum
Fig. 2The 8-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) and CT scans indicate high 18-FDG uptake in (a) the primary tumor (SUVmax: 3.34); (b) enlarged para-aortic lymph node (SUVmax: 2.58); and (c) anterosuperior segment of right hepatic lobe (SUVmax: 2.74)
Fig. 3a Colonoscopy also showed extrinsic compression of rectum, but no change in rectal mucosa. b Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showed a 30-mm low echoic lesion originating from rectum. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsy specimen obtained by EUS-FNAB showed that tumor was positive for both (c) CK20 and (d) CDX2
Fig. 4a Macroscopically, the tumor was completely covered by normal rectal mucosa. b The formalin-fixed resected specimen showed a 2-mm bulge above the mucosa level
Fig. 5a Histologically, the tumor was composed of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. b The carcinoma was mainly located at subserosa and had severely invaded to lymphatic and blood vessels. c Adenocarcinoma was observed in the submucosal layer and the mucosal surface showed no exposure of the cancer component
Reported cases of colorectal cancer resembling SMT in which tumor was completely covered with normal colorectal mucosa
| Case | Year | Age (years) | Gender | Locationa | Size (cm) | Endoscopic findings | Depth of invasionb | Histologic diagnosis of biopsy specimen | Histologic diagnosis of resected specimenc | Lymph node metastasis | Distant metastasis | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 57 | M | Rb | 10 | None | A | Unknown | Muc | Absent | Unknown | 5 |
| 2 | 2011 | 82 | M | S | 8 | None | SS | Normal mucosa | Muc | Absent | Absent | 6 |
| 3 | 2014 | 79 | M | Ra | 2.6 | Erosion | SE | Not performed | Mod | Absent | Absent | 7 |
| 4 | 2017 | 55 | F | RS | 4 | None | SS | Normal mucosa | Mod | Present | Liver metastasis | Our case |
aLocation. Ra upper rectum, Rb lower rectum, RS rectosigmoid, S sigmoid colon
bDepth of invasion. A adventitia, SE serosa, SS subserosa
cHistologic diagnosis of resected specimen. Mod moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, Muc mucinous carcinoma