Dean A Shumway1, Kent A Griffith2, Michael S Sabel3, Rochelle D Jones1, Julie M Forstner1, Terri L Bott-Kothari1, Sarah T Hawley4, Jacqueline Jeruss3, Reshma Jagsi5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Center for Cancer Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rjagsi@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although clinical trials have shown no survival advantage and only a modest improvement in local control from adjuvant radiotherapy after lumpectomy in older women with stage I, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, radiotherapy is commonly administered, raising concerns about overtreatment. Therefore, we sought to evaluate physician views on omission of radiotherapy in older women with favorable prognosis breast cancer. METHODS: We surveyed a national sample of 713 radiation oncologists and 879 surgeons. Of these, 1504 were eligible and 825 responded (55%). We assessed responses to clinical scenarios, knowledge of pertinent risk information, and correlates of views on radiotherapy omission. RESULTS: Omission of radiotherapy in patients age ≥70 years with stage I, ER+ breast cancer, treated with lumpectomy and endocrine therapy, was felt to be unreasonable by 40% of surgeons and 20% of radiation oncologists. Many surgeons (29%) and radiation oncologists (10%) erroneously associated radiotherapy in older women with improvement in survival. Similarly, 32% of surgeons and 19% of radiation oncologists tended to substantially overestimate the risk of locoregional recurrence in older women with omission of RT. In a scenario with an 81-year-old with multiple comorbidities, 31% of surgeons and 35% of radiation oncologists would still recommend radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many radiation oncologists and surgeons continue to consider omission of radiotherapy as substandard therapy and overestimate the benefits of radiotherapy. Surgeons, in addition to radiation oncologists, may have an opportunity to play a pivotal role in reducing overuse of aggressive care in this setting.
PURPOSE: Although clinical trials have shown no survival advantage and only a modest improvement in local control from adjuvant radiotherapy after lumpectomy in older women with stage I, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, radiotherapy is commonly administered, raising concerns about overtreatment. Therefore, we sought to evaluate physician views on omission of radiotherapy in older women with favorable prognosis breast cancer. METHODS: We surveyed a national sample of 713 radiation oncologists and 879 surgeons. Of these, 1504 were eligible and 825 responded (55%). We assessed responses to clinical scenarios, knowledge of pertinent risk information, and correlates of views on radiotherapy omission. RESULTS: Omission of radiotherapy in patients age ≥70 years with stage I, ER+ breast cancer, treated with lumpectomy and endocrine therapy, was felt to be unreasonable by 40% of surgeons and 20% of radiation oncologists. Many surgeons (29%) and radiation oncologists (10%) erroneously associated radiotherapy in older women with improvement in survival. Similarly, 32% of surgeons and 19% of radiation oncologists tended to substantially overestimate the risk of locoregional recurrence in older women with omission of RT. In a scenario with an 81-year-old with multiple comorbidities, 31% of surgeons and 35% of radiation oncologists would still recommend radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many radiation oncologists and surgeons continue to consider omission of radiotherapy as substandard therapy and overestimate the benefits of radiotherapy. Surgeons, in addition to radiation oncologists, may have an opportunity to play a pivotal role in reducing overuse of aggressive care in this setting.
Authors: Lesly A Dossett; Nicole M Mott; Brooke C Bredbeck; Ton Wang; Chad Tc Jobin; Tasha M Hughes; Sarah T Hawley; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Nicole Mott; Ton Wang; Jacquelyn Miller; Nicholas L Berlin; Sarah Hawley; Reshma Jagsi; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Lesly A Dossett Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Dean A Shumway; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Lauren P Wallner; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Monica Morrow; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Ton Wang; Alison Baskin; Jacquelyn Miller; Allan Metz; Niki Matusko; Tasha Hughes; Michael Sabel; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lesly A Dossett Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Xiao Xu; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Shi-Yi Wang; Craig Evan Pollack; Suzanne B Evans; James B Yu; Cary P Gross Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Ton Wang; Nicole Mott; Jacquelyn Miller; Nicholas L Berlin; Sarah Hawley; Reshma Jagsi; Lesly A Dossett Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-09-01