Literature DB >> 28748209

Metagenomic data of free cyanide and thiocyanate degrading bacterial communities.

Lukhanyo Mekuto1, Seteno K O Ntwampe1, John B N Mudumbi1, Enoch A Akinpelu1, Maxwell Mewa-Ngongang1.   

Abstract

The data presented in this article contains the bacterial community structure of the free cyanide (CN-) and thiocyanate (SCN-) degrading organisms that were isolated from electroplating wastewater and synthetic SCN- containing wastewater. PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA V1-V3 regions was undertaken using the 27F and 518R oligonucleotide primers following the metacommunity DNA extraction procedure. The PCR amplicons were processed using the illumina® reaction kits as per manufacturer׳s instruction and sequenced using the illumina® MiSeq-2000, using the MiSeq V3 kit. The data was processed using bioinformatics tools such as QIIME and the raw sequence files are available via NCBI׳s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; Cyanide degrading organisms; Metagenomics; Thiocyanate degrading organisms

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748209      PMCID: PMC5512189          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.06.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data This research data provides crucial information on the bacterial community structure and differences between the CDOs and TDOs post-CN- and SCN- exposure, respectively. The presented data can be utilized by researchers for comparative studies related to CN- and SCN- biodegradation. The bacterial organisms detected in both the CDOs and TDOs were mainly dominated by bacteria which have never been reported to possess CN- and SCN- degradation capabilities, and future research necessitates for the determination of the role that these organisms play in CN- and SCN- biodegradation processes.

Data

The presented dataset contains the bacterial composition of free cyanide (CDO) and thiocyanate degrading (TDO) organisms from electroplating and synthetic SCN- containing wastewater, respectively. Table 1 shows the comparative analysis of the bacterial compositions between the CDOs and TDOs.
Table 1

Comparative analysis of the CDO and TDO bacterial communities.

CDO
TDO
Organism% AbundanceAccessionOrganism% AbundanceAccession
Myroides odoratimimus35.26gi|922317158|gb|KR349266.1|Myroides odoratimimus37.82gi|163932218|gb|EU331413.1|
Proteus sp.17.58gi|189409506|gb|EU710747.1|Proteus vulgaris30.50gi|923095386|gb|KP969052.1|
Myroides sp.4.86gi|914702437|gb|KP823024.1|Uncultured bacterium6.71gi|648092936|gb|KJ604130.1|
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia3.88gi|194346582|gb|CP001111.1|Myroides sp.4.81gi|736012191|gb|CP010327.1|
Proteus mirabilis3.88gi|333353439|gb|JF772095.1|Uncultured proteus2.54gi|506969934|gb|KC896751.1|
Uncultured Enterobacteriaceae3.86gi|294613661|gb|GU905819.1|Stenotrophomonas maltophilia2.25gi|194346582|gb|CP001111.1|
Uncultured Proteus3.41gi|506969934|gb|KC896751.1|Uncultured providencia1.54gi|926458287|dbj|LC079061.1|
Proteus vulgaris1.67gi|340025986|gb|JN092605.1|Acidovorax sp.0.87gi|120604516|gb|CP000539.1|
Delftia sp.1.31gi|333741867|gb|CP002735.1|Delftia sp.0.67gi|333741867|gb|CP002735.1|
Uncultured Thiobacillus1.26gi|926657308|dbj|LC000812.1|Delftia acidovorans0.49gi|160361034|gb|CP000884.1|
Uncultured Providencia1.08gi|926458287|dbj|LC079061.1|Pseudomonas syringae0.36gi|63253978|gb|CP000075.1|
Delftia acidovorans0.73gi|160361034|gb|CP000884.1|Citrobacter koseri0.35gi|673531252|emb|LK931336.1|
Myroides profundi0.49gi|753770668|gb|CP010817.1|Alicycliphilus denitrificans0.28gi|329308025|gb|CP002657.1|
Proteus penneri0.40gi|919500502|gb|KT427910.1|Ralstonia solanacearum0.26gi|916490054|gb|CP011997.1|
Providencia vermicola0.39gi|340026009|gb|JN092796.1|Uncultured thiobacillus0.25gi|698322799|gb|KM595276.1|
Klebsiella pneumoniae0.37gi|926677775|gb|CP012300.1|Pseudomonas aeruginosa0.24gi|660504631|gb|CP008749.1|
Pseudomonas syringae0.37gi|63253978|gb|CP000075.1|Sideroxydans lithotrophicus0.24gi|291582584|gb|CP001965.1|
Acidovorax sp.0.33gi|407894523|gb|CP003872.1|Oceanimonas sp.0.24gi|444439651|ref|NR_074966.1|
Alcaligenes sp.0.28gi|485951523|gb|KC534482.1|Serratia marcescens0.23gi|560171871|emb|HG326223.1|
Serratia marcescens0.24gi|560171871|emb|HG326223.1|Uncultured Dokdonella0.23gi|107785044|gb|DQ533520.1|
Comamonas testosteroni0.22gi|672605233|gb|CP006704.1|Providencia sp.0.22gi|815932210|gb|KR232641.1|
Ralstonia pickettii0.19gi|546340292|gb|CP006668.1|Cupriavidus necator0.21gi|338167938|gb|CP002878.1|
Providencia sp.0.19gi|815932210|gb|KR232641.1|Pseudomonas aeruginosa0.21gi|915391195|dbj|AP014839.2|
Cellulomonas flavigena0.16gi|296019684|gb|CP001964.1|Pseudomonas chlororaphis0.19gi|829490642|gb|CP011020.1|
Pseudomonas putida0.14gi|158392725|dbj|AB333783.1|Alicycliphilus denitrificans0.19gi|329312633|gb|CP002658.1|
Comparative analysis of the CDO and TDO bacterial communities.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Sample collection and isolation procedure

The CDOs were isolated from an electroplating facility wastewater. The wastewater was collected in sterile non-transparent 20 L polypropylene containers and the cyanide concentration was immediately quantified to be above 150 mg CN-/L, using the detection technique developed by [1]. The TDOs were isolated from synthetic SCN--containing wastewater solution (500 mL) containing (g/L); K2HPO4 (3.4), KH2PO4 (4.3), Glucose (0.01), SCN- (0.2) and CN- (0.2), at a pH of 10 (±0.05), using the gravimetric technique. Briefly, the solution was exposed for two months to allow airborne microorganisms to settle on the media outside the laboratory. A fraction (100 mL) of both the synthetic and electroplating wastewater solutions was filtered sterilized in a 0.22 µm Millipore membrane and the microbial cells were re-suspended in 5 mL of sterile Millipore water in preparation of DNA extraction procedures.

DNA extraction and Sequencing

The metacommunity DNA was extracted directly from the CDO and TDO re-suspension solutions, using commercially available extraction kits (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), as per manufacturer׳s instructions. The 16S rRNA forward bacterial primers 27F-16S-5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-′3 and reverse primers 518R-16S-5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-′3 [2] that targeted the V1 and V3 regions of the 16S rRNA were used for the PCR amplification of the purified DNA samples. The PCR amplicons were gel purified, end repaired and illumina® specific adapter sequence were ligated to each amplicon. Following quantification and purification steps, the amplicons were then sequenced using the illumina® MiSeq-2000, using a MiSeq V3 (600 cycle) kit. 20 Mb of the data (2×300 bp long paired end reads) were produced for each sample as described previously [3]. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)-based data analysis was performed with the assistance of an Inqaba Biotec (Pretoria, South Africa) in-house developed data analysis pipeline.
Subject areaBiology, Microbial ecology, Biodiversity
More specific subject areaMetagenomics
Type of dataTable
How data was acquiredSequencing was conducted on an Illumina® MiSeq-2000, using a MiSeq V3 (600 cycle) kit following the procedures developed at Inqaba Biotech (Pretoria, South Africa) (www.inqababiotec.co.za).
Data formatRaw data
Experimental factorsThe flanking regions of the 16S rRNA gene (V1-V3) were PCR amplified using the 27F and 518R oligonucleotide primers.
Experimental featuresCyanide degrading organisms (CDOs) were isolated in electroplating wastewater. Since the CDOs were unable to degrade SCN-, a gravimetric technique was employed in synthetic wastewater containing SCN- outside the BioERG laboratory. Metacommunity DNA was extracted from both the CDOs and TDOs for sequencing.
Data source locationBioERG laboratory, Cape Town, South Africa (33.9324°S, 18.6406°E)Electroplating facility, Cape Town, South Africa (33.9708°S, 18.5780°E)
Data accessibilityThe accession numbers of the sequence data are publicly available on a public repository (http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5110) and are also embedded within Supplementary Table 1 and 2.
  2 in total

1.  Bifidobacterial diversity in human feces detected by genus-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  R M Satokari; E E Vaughan; A D Akkermans; M Saarela; W M de Vos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A metagenomic approach to decipher the indigenous microbial communities of arsenic contaminated groundwater of Assam.

Authors:  Saurav Das; Sudipta Sankar Bora; R N S Yadav; Madhumita Barooah
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2017-03-30
  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Microbial communities associated with the co-metabolism of free cyanide and thiocyanate under alkaline conditions.

Authors:  Lukhanyo Mekuto; Seteno Karabo Obed Ntwampe; John Baptist N Mudumbi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Comparison of targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods for analysing the lung microbiome.

Authors:  T Goolam Mahomed; Rph Peters; Ghj Pretorius; A Goolam Mahomed; V Ueckermann; M M Kock; M M Ehlers
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.605

3.  Process performance determination data in thiocyanate biodegradation systems: Use of sulphate production.

Authors:  Lukhanyo Mekuto; Lovasoa C Razanamahandry; Seteno K O Ntwampe; John-Baptist N Mudumbi; Gift Muchatibaya
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2018-01-20

4.  Functional Analysis of a Polluted River Microbiome Reveals a Metabolic Potential for Bioremediation.

Authors:  Luz Breton-Deval; Ayixon Sanchez-Reyes; Alejandro Sanchez-Flores; Katy Juárez; Ilse Salinas-Peralta; Patricia Mussali-Galante
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.