| Literature DB >> 28748132 |
Yuhi Saito1, Toshihiro Mihara1, Kentaro Maruyama1, Jiro Saito2, Masumi Ikeda3, Akihito Tomonaga4, Takehisa Kumagai1.
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria are gut flora that play key roles in intestinal homeostasis, which may affect a variety of physiological functions. Our preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials have suggested that intake of heat-killed Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei 327 (designated L. K-1) is effective for improving skin conditions. The aim of this study was to confirm the effect of L. K-1 intake in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy female volunteers. Sixty-four subjects were allocated to either the placebo food group (group P, n=32) or active food group (group A, n=32), in which subjects consumed lactobacillus K-1 50 mg (approximately 1 × 1011 bacteria) daily for 8 weeks. After excluding subjects who declined to participate (n=1), violated restrictions (n=4), or were judged ineligible by the principal investigators (n=1), data obtained with 58 subjects (30 in group A and 28 in group P) were analyzed for efficacy by comparing differences from pretrial levels between the two groups. When the level of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured at the arm, the level of TEWL at week 4 of the intake period was significantly lower in group A than group P (p=0.021), suggesting an improvement of skin barrier function. Analysis of skin condition questionnaire data revealed a significant reduction in skin flakiness on the face (week 4). No adverse events were associated with intake of the test foods. The safety of L. K-1 was also confirmed in an independent open-label trial in 11 healthy subjects who consumed excessive amounts of L. K-1 250 mg (approximately 5 × 1011 bacteria). Intake of L. K-1 may therefore be beneficial to skin condition improvement.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus casei; clinical study; lactic acid bacteria; skin conditions; transepidermal water loss
Year: 2017 PMID: 28748132 PMCID: PMC5510156 DOI: 10.12938/bmfh.16-031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Microbiota Food Health ISSN: 2186-3342
Composition of the test tablets
| Placebo tablet | Active tablet | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | Glucose, starch, calcium stearate, fine granular silica, hydroxypropylcellulose | |
| Nutritional facts (value for daily dose, 0.5 g) | ||
| Energy (kcal) | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Protein (g) | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Fat (g) | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| Sodium (mg) | 0.10 | 0.32 |
aThe content of L. casei subsp. casei 327 was 50 mg (approximately 1 × 1011 bacteria) per daily dose (0.5 g; two tablets).
Fig. 1.Outline of the study.
Subjects in group A consumed L. K-1-containing tablets, and subjects in group P consumed placebo tablets. Exclusion before randomization due to judgment by the investigator (n=9) was mainly based on age, stool frequency, or TEWL value.
Background characteristics of the subjects analyzed for efficacy
| Item | Group | Observed value | p value |
| Number of subjects | A | 30 | NA |
| P | 28 | ||
| Age (years) | A | 41.3 ± 9.0 | 0.766 |
| P | 42.1 ± 11.5 | ||
| Height (cm) | A | 159.27 ± 5.62 | 0.703 |
| P | 158.70 ± 5.69 | ||
| Body weight (kg) | A | 50.50 ± 5.81 | 0.483 |
| P | 49.38 ± 6.20 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | A | 19.88 ± 1.85 | 0.537 |
| P | 19.58 ± 1.89 | ||
| TEWL at the cheek (g/hm2) | A | 11.93 ± 2.11 | 0.661 |
| P | 11.71 ± 1.77 | ||
| TEWL at the arm (g/hm2) | A | 9.45 ± 1.02 | 0.061 |
| P | 8.95 ± 0.99 | ||
| Stratum corneum hydration at the cheek (a.u.) | A | 34.31 ± 9.06 | 0.201 |
| P | 30.98 ± 10.47 | ||
| Stratum corneum hydration at the arm (a.u.) | A | 19.69 ± 3.54 | 0.522 |
| P | 20.37 ± 4.44 |
Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. p values were determined by unpaired Student’s t-tests. NA: not applicable; BMI: body mass index; TEWL: transepidermal water loss.
TEWL and corneum hydration values before and after L. K-1 intake
| Item | Group | Pretrial | Week 4 | Week 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEWL (g/hm2) | ||||
| Cheek | A | 11.93 ± 2.11 | 11.58 ± 2.30 | 11.90 ± 3.34 |
| P | 11.71 ± 1.77 | 12.12 ± 3.40 | 12.41 ± 3.14 | |
| Arm | A | 9.45 ± 1.02 | 9.05 ± 1.13 | 8.54 ± 1.19 |
| P | 8.95 ± 0.99 | 9.06 ± 1.03 | 8.46 ± 0.87 | |
| Stratum corneum hydration (a.u.) | ||||
| Cheek | A | 34.31 ± 9.06 | 36.50 ± 6.15 | 35.50 ± 7.21 |
| P | 30.98 ± 10.47 | 32.93 ± 9.25 | 33.48 ± 9.89 | |
| Arm | A | 19.69 ± 3.54 | 18.40 ± 3.80 | 17.52 ± 3.45 |
| P | 20.37 ± 4.44 | 19.77 ± 5.02 | 18.71 ± 4.17 | |
Each value represents the mean ± SD. n=30 for group A (except week 4, n=29) and n=28 for group P. TEWL: transepidermal water loss.
Fig. 2.Time course of the effect of L. K-1 intake on TEWL and stratum corneum hydration at the cheek and arm.
The changes from pretrial values in TEWL (ΔTEWL) at the right cheek (A) and left upper arm (B) and in corneum hydration (Δcorneum hydration) at the right cheek (C) and left upper arm (D) are shown. Each value is expressed as the mean ± SD. p values were calculated between groups using the unpaired Student’s t-test.
Correlation of arm TEWL with age, height, body weight, or BMI
| Arm TEWL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active | Placebo | |||
| Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 4 | Week 8 | |
| Age | 0.254 | 0.128 | 0.108 | 0.101 |
| (0.18) | (0.50) | (0.58) | (0.61) | |
| Height | −0.047 | 0.017 | −0.331 | −0.195 |
| (0.81) | (0.93) | (0.09) | (0.32) | |
| Body weight | 0.143 | 0.266 | 0.113 | −0.013 |
| (0.46) | (0.16) | (0.57) | (0.95) | |
| BMI | 0.229 | 0.325 | 0.377 | 0.117 |
| (0.23) | (0.08) | (0.05) | (0.55) | |
Each value represents Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. p values are shown in parentheses.
The results of the skin condition questionnaire
| Position | No. | Item | Group | Week 4 | Week 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face | Q1 | Moistness | A | (–1, 0, 3) | (–1, 1, 3) |
| P | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q2 | Smoothness | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 4) | |
| P | (–1, 0, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q3 | Springiness | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 4) | |
| P | (–1, 1, 3) | (–2, 1, 3) | |||
| Q4 | Dullness | A | (–2, 1, 2) | (–2, 1, 2) | |
| P | (–1, 0, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q5 | Texture | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 4) | |
| P | (0, 1, 2) | (0, 1, 4) | |||
| Q6 | Flaky skin | A | (–1, 1, 3)** | (–2, 1, 4) | |
| P | (–2, 0, 2) | (–1, 0, 3) | |||
| Q7 | Wrinkles around the eye | A | (–1, 1, 2) | (–2, 1, 3) | |
| P | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q8 | Affinity to cosmetics | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 4) | |
| P | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 4) | |||
| Q9 | Pimples | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 3) | |
| P | (–2, 0, 2) | (–2, 0, 3) | |||
| Arm | Q10 | Moistness | A | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) |
| P | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q11 | Smoothness | A | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |
| P | (–1, 1, 2) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
| Q12 | Skin crazing at the elbow | A | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 2)** | |
| P | (0, 1, 3) | (0, 1, 3) | |||
| Q13 | Flaky skin at the elbow | A | (–1, 0, 4) | (–1, 1, 3)* | |
| P | (–1, 1, 3) | (–1, 1, 3) | |||
The data are 2.5th percentile, the median, and 97.5th percentile of the change from the pretrial value graded on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (bad condition) to 7 (good condition). n=30 for group A and n=28 (except Q9, n=27) for group P. *p<0.05 compared with group P by Mann-Whitney U test. **p<0.01 compared with group P by Mann-Whitney U test.
Effects of excessive intake of L. K-1 on hematology and blood chemistry parameters
| Item | Pretrial | Week 2 | Week 4 | Posttrial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White blood cell (number/μl) | 4,581.8 ± 995.8 | 5,181.8 ± 984.7* | 5,018.2 ± 965.2 | 5,145.5 ± 773.8* |
| Red blood cell (number × 104 μl) | 446.5 ± 48.9 | 452.5 ± 50.1 | 449.4 ± 50.9 | 445.1 ± 53.3 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 13.50 ± 1.33 | 13.67 ± 1.41 | 13.35 ± 1.36 | 13.40 ± 1.35 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 42.01 ± 3.46 | 43.52 ± 4.09* | 42.85 ± 3.92* | 42.65 ± 4.46 |
| Platelet (number × 104 μl) | 22.87 ± 4.73 | 23.08 ± 4.36 | 23.64 ± 4.16 | 22.39 ± 4.17 |
| AST (U/l) | 19.4 ± 3.5 | 17.5 ± 3.0 | 18.7 ± 2.8 | 18.9 ± 3.1 |
| ALT (U/l) | 14.4 ± 5.1 | 13.1 ± 4.7 | 13.1 ± 3.6 | 13.5 ± 4.8 |
| LDH (U/l) | 167.6 ± 25.8 | 166.6 ± 17.8 | 170.5 ± 23.7 | 169.2 ± 22.8 |
| ALP (U/l) | 183.3 ± 41.1 | 203.0 ± 60.1 | 198.5 ± 82.2 | 188.1 ± 40.5 |
| γ-GTP (U/l) | 17.8 ± 7.6 | 17.4 ± 6.9 | 17.0 ± 6.2 | 17.1 ± 7.6 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.79 ± 0.18 | 0.63 ± 0.18* | 0.65 ± 0.18 | 0.72 ± 0.38 |
| Albumin (g/dl) | 4.55 ± 0.25 | 4.53 ± 0.22 | 4.45 ± 0.24 | 4.44 ± 0.16 |
| Total protein (g/dl) | 7.21 ± 0.35 | 7.12 ± 0.33 | 7.11 ± 0.42 | 7.03 ± 0.33* |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl) | 13.18 ± 3.18 | 13.23 ± 3.91 | 13.65 ± 4.21 | 13.08 ± 3.79 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.780 ± 0.137 | 0.791 ± 0.128 | 0.798 ± 0.132 | 0.781 ± 0.134 |
| Uric acid (mg/dl) | 4.86 ± 1.24 | 5.05 ± 1.40 | 5.31 ± 1.37 | 4.98 ± 1.29 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 195.0 ± 28.1 | 181.7 ± 20.8 | 181.6 ± 27.1 | 183.3 ± 21.8 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 115.7 ± 21.4 | 102.8 ± 17.9* | 101.6 ± 24.7* | 102.5 ± 15.4* |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 67.9 ± 12.7 | 61.5 ± 10.4 | 61.8 ± 11.1* | 62.5 ± 12.6 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 57.2 ± 19.9 | 74.0 ± 38.7 | 81.8 ± 87.4 | 79.1 ± 49.5 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 83.1 ± 6.8 | 81.9 ± 8.0 | 81.1 ± 11.8 | 81.3 ± 6.0 |
| Na (mEq/l) | 141.1 ± 0.9 | 141.5 ± 1.4 | 142.0 ± 1.5 | 141.6 ± 1.7 |
| K (mEq/l) | 4.53 ± 0.45 | 4.54 ± 0.45 | 4.58 ± 0.42 | 4.41 ± 0.41 |
| Cl (mEq/l) | 104.8 ± 1.4 | 104.9 ± 1.4 | 103.6 ± 1.7* | 104.8 ± 1.8 |
Each value is the mean ± SD of 11 subjects. *p<0.05 by paired Student’s t-test compared with the respective pretrial values. AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; γ-GTP: γ-glutamyltranspeptidase; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol