| Literature DB >> 28747706 |
Chuying Yu1, Yang Zeng2, Bin Yang3, Robert Donnan2, Jinbao Huang4, Zhaoxian Xiong4, Amit Mahajan1, Baogui Shi5, Haitao Ye5, Russell Binions1, Nadezda V Tarakina1, Mike J Reece1, Haixue Yan6.
Abstract
Realising engineering ceramics to serve as substrate materials in high-performance terahertz(THz) that are low-cost, have low dielectric loss and near-dispersionless broadband, high permittivity, is exceedingly demanding. Such substrates are deployed in, for example, integrated circuits for synthesizing and converting nonplanar and 3D structures into planar forms. The Rutile form of titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been widely accepted as commercially economical candidate substrate that meets demands for both low-loss and high permittivities at sub-THz bands. However, the relationship between its mechanisms of dielectric response to the microstructure have never been systematically investigated in order to engineer ultra-low dielectric-loss and high value, dispersionless permittivities. Here we show TiO2 THz dielectrics with high permittivity (ca. 102.30) and ultra-low loss (ca. 0.0042). These were prepared by insight gleaned from a broad use of materials characterisation methods to successfully engineer porosities, second phase, crystallography shear-planes and oxygen vacancies during sintering. The dielectric loss achieved here is not only with negligible dispersion over 0.2-0.8 THz, but also has the lowest value measured for known high-permittivity dielectrics. We expect the insight afforded by this study will underpin the development of subwavelength-scale, planar integrated circuits, compact high Q-resonators and broadband, slow-light devices in the THz band.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28747706 PMCID: PMC5529529 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07019-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SEM of (a) fracture surface of CS1210; (b) CS1210 thermally etched at 1150 °C; (c) SPS1050 thermally etched at 1000 °C; (d) SPS1200 thermally etched at 1050 °C; (e) SPS1250 thermally etched at 1100 °C; (f) fracture surface of SPS1250 (S denotes sintering aid; P, precipitation).
Figure 2XPS of (a) Ti 2p peaks of CS samples; (b) O 1 s peaks of CS samples with fitted CS1210; (c) Ti 2p peaks of SPS samples; (d) O 1 s peaks of SPS samples with fitted SPS1050.
Figure 3(a) HRTEM image of defects in CS1250; (b) selected area diffraction pattern (SAED) taken from the crystal in (a). Red and white indices indicate reflections on the SAED that are coming from different twin domains in the rutile structure; (c) HRTEM image of the area marked by dashed lines in (a), showing twin defects; (d) bright-field electron microscopy image showing complex defects in CS1250. White arrows indicate positions of faults; (e) SAED pattern taken from the area of the crystal with defects shown in (d). The pattern is indexed in the Ti4O7 Magnéli phase. (f) HRTEM image of the area marked by dashed lines in (d), showing the Ti4O7 Magnéli phase area of the grain.
Figure 4(a) Raman spectra of conventional sintering samples; (b) peak position and FWHM of the Eg mode of CS samples; (c) Raman spectra of SPS samples; (d) peak position and FWHM of Eg mode of SPS samples.
Figure 5Frequency-dependence of (a) permittivity in CS samples; (b) permittivity in SPS samples; (c) dielectric loss in CS samples and (d) dielectric loss in SPS samples in the THz sub-spectral domain (0.20–0.80 THz). The solid lines are the experimental results from THz-TDS system and the discrete points are the experimental results from the VNA + QO transmission system.
Figure 6A review of reported dielectric behaviour for different materials at (a) 0.3 THz; (b) 0.8 THz (references are provided in the supplementary information).