| Literature DB >> 28747653 |
Tatsuki Kunoh1,2, Syuji Matsumoto1,2, Noriyuki Nagaoka3, Shoko Kanashima4, Katsuhiko Hino4, Tetsuya Uchida2, Katsunori Tamura1,2, Hitoshi Kunoh1,2, Jun Takada5,6.
Abstract
<Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28747653 PMCID: PMC5529543 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06644-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of experiments toward the goal of this study.
Figure 2TEM images (a) of OUMS1-WT and OUMS1-SL after incubating in SGP and then with SGP + Fe plate and SEM images with EDX distribution patterns of elements (b) of both strains. (a) Left, SGP incubation for 2 days: cross section of OUMS1-WT cell encased with a thin, immature sheath (arrow) (upper left) and OUMS1-SL cell with no sheath (lower left). Center, additional 2-day incubation in SGP + Fe plate: electron-dense Fe particles on and near the immature sheath encasing OUMS1-WT cells (upper center) and on a few fibril aggregations far from OUMS1-SL cells (lower center, arrowhead). Right, additional 14-day incubation in SGP + Fe plate: deposition of electron-dense Fe particles in a thick sheath encasing OUMS1-WT cells and in abundant fibrils extending outward from the sheath surface (upper right). Electron-dense fibril aggregation seen apart from the OUMS1-SL cell (lower right), but no sheath has formed. (b) Aggregated immature sheaths of OUMS1-WT after incubating in SGP + Fe plate for 14 days with EDX distribution patterns of S, Si, Ca, P, and Fe showing apparent deposition of Si, P, and Fe on sheaths. (c) Aggregated chains of cells of OUMS1-SL after incubating in SGP + Fe plate for 14 days with EDX distribution patterns of S, Si, Ca, P, and Fe, lacking any distinguishable deposition, even of Fe.
Figure 3GC/MS spectrograph showing sugar composition in protein-free OUMS1-WT sheath remnants and attachment of Fe(III) minerals on OUMS1-WT sheath skeleton treated with NH2-binding fluorescent reagents. (a) GalN and GlcN were detected in the sheath remnants as major saccharic materials. (b) Schematic figure of allophycocyanin-conjugated NH2-reactive reagent (APC-reagent) masking NH2 group. (c) Top, DIC images of immature sheaths encasing OUMS1-WT cell chains and longitudinally extending, sheath-uncovered OUMS1-SL cell chains after treatment with APC-reagent. Bottom, APC-reagent-treated OUMS1-WT sheaths turned blue within 30 min (inset) and fluoresced red; similarly treated OUMS1-SL were visibly unchanged (inset) and did not fluoresce. (d) Fe ratios in OUMS1-WT sheaths and those treated with APC-reagent, sulfo-NHS-acetate, or acetic anhydride after incubation in Fe(III)SGP relative to those in Fe-free SGP (with At% of Fe = 1). Note the suppressed Fe levels in these NH2-masked sheaths. (e) TEM images of OUMS1-WT cells. None (APC reagent-untreated) 1st, a cell encased with thin, immature sheath (arrow) after incubation in SGP; 2nd, electron-dense Fe(III) minerals (arrowheads) attached to surface of immature sheath and fibrils extending from the surface after incubation in Fe(III)SGP (inset, enlarged image showing mineral attachment to the extending fibrils [arrowhead]). APC reagent 3rd, APC-reagent-treated cell encased with a thin, immature sheath (arrow) incubated in SGP; 4th, no Fe minerals on or near the sheath even after incubation in Fe(III)SGP.
Figure 4STEM image and EDX element distribution pattern on immature sheaths encasing OUMS1-WT cell incubated in Fe(III)SGP. (a) Top, STEM image of electron-dense particles attached to the sheath and distribution patterns of N and O. Bottom, distribution of P, S, and Fe. (b) Semiquantitative distribution maps of O and Fe determined by the Cliff-Lorimer method. The signals for both elements at the same location strongly suggest that Fe could exist as iron oxides. (c) Merged images for distribution of O/Fe, P/Fe, and S/Fe, suggesting that the electron-dense Fe particles plausibly bind the medium components.
Figure 5Photoelectron spectra acquired by XPS from OUMS1-WT sheaths incubated in SGP or in Fe(III)SGP. SGP: (a) Peaks of C1s, O1s, and N1s detected. Fe(III)SGP: (b) Additional Fe2p peaks detected. (c) Shift of N1s peak toward higher binding energy.
Figure 6Behavior of Fe(III) minerals on cellulose and chitosan. (a) Fe ratios on cellulose and chitosan after incubating in Fe(III)SGP relative to At% of Fe = 1 in Fe-free SGP. (b) Top, merged images of SEM and EDX Fe distribution on cellulose and chitosan incubated in SGP. Bottom, Merged images of cellulose and chitosan incubated in Fe(III)SGP, showing Fe deposition on chitosan. (c) Left, SGP-incubated chitosan without any fine particles attached. Right, Fe(III)SGP-incubated chitosan with abundant fine particles (arrowheads), especially on aggregated fibrils (arrows). (d,f) XPS spectra of cellulose mixed with either SGP or Fe(III)SGP; note O1s and C1s peaks but none for N and Fe. (e,g) XPS spectra for chitosan after incubation in either SGP or Fe(III)SGP; note O1s, C1s, and N1s peaks in SGP incubation, additional Fe2p peaks in Fe(III)SGP. (h) N1s peak shifted toward higher binding energy after Fe(III)SGP incubation.
Figure 7Behavior of Fe(III) minerals on plain and NH2-coated polystyrene beads. (a) Precipitation only on NH2-coated beads (NH2 beads) within 30 min after incubating in the suspension of Fe(III) minerals. (b) Top, merged images of SEM and EDX Fe distribution on plain and NH2 beads incubated with SGP. Bottom, merged image of the respective beads incubated with Fe(III)SGP, showing Fe deposition on NH2 beads. Fe ratios in Fe(III)SGP detected by XRF relative to At% of Fe = 1 on SGP-incubated beads: ~1.3 for plain beads, ~6.0 for NH2 beads. (c,d) XPS spectra of plain beads incubated with SGP and Fe(III)SGP, respectively, detecting O1s and C1s but no N and Fe peaks. (e,f) XPS spectra of NH2 beads incubated in SGP and Fe(III)SGP, respectively, detecting O1s, C1s, and N1s with SGP incubation and additional Fe2p peaks with Fe(III)SGP. (g) N1s peak shifted toward higher binding energy after incubation in Fe(III)SGP.