Literature DB >> 28747375

Evaluation of the Rapid Polymyxin NP Test for Polymyxin B Resistance Detection Using Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes Isolates.

Shelby Simar1, Diane Sibley1, Deborah Ashcraft1, George Pankey2.   

Abstract

Polymyxin resistance is an increasing problem worldwide. Currently, determining susceptibility to polymyxins is problematic and lengthy. Polymyxins diffuse poorly into agar, potentially giving inaccurate disk diffusion and Etest results. A rapid screening test (2 h) for the detection of polymyxin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae, developed by P. Nordmann and L. Poirel (rapid polymyxin NP test) in 2016, detects glucose metabolization in the presence of polymyxin E (PE) and PB via pH-induced color change. The sensitivity and specificity were 99.3 and 95.4%, respectively, with results obtained in ≤2 h. Our goal was to evaluate this test using PB against larger numbers of Enterobacter A total of 143 nonduplicate Enterobacter isolates (102 E. cloacae complex, 41 E. aerogenes) were tested, including 136 collected from Ochsner Health System patients from March to May 2016 and 7 previously determined PB-resistant E. cloacae isolates from JMI Laboratories. MICs were determined via broth microdilution. For the rapid polymyxin NP test, a color change from orange to yellow is positive; a weak/no color change is deemed negative after 4 h. Of 143 Enterobacter isolates, 25 were determined to be PB resistant by broth microdilution (MIC > 2 μg/ml), including all 7 JMI isolates. Of these 25, 7 were positive by the rapid polymyxin NP test (included 3/7 JMI isolates). All 118 isolates determined to be PB susceptible by broth microdilution were NP test negative. The sensitivity and specificity for the rapid polymyxin NP test were 25 and 100%, respectively, compared to broth microdilution. Although the rapid polymyxin NP test is a much faster method (2 to 4 h) for polymyxin resistance determination compared to broth microdilution (16 to 20 h), our study indicates that it may be subject to limitations when testing Enterobacter.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacter; drug resistance; microbial drug resistance; polymyxin B

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28747375      PMCID: PMC5625387          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00934-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

Review 1.  Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins: where are we now?

Authors:  Romney M Humphries
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Polymyxins: Antibacterial Activity, Susceptibility Testing, and Resistance Mechanisms Encoded by Plasmids or Chromosomes.

Authors:  Laurent Poirel; Aurélie Jayol; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Cluster-dependent colistin hetero-resistance in Enterobacter cloacae complex.

Authors:  François Guérin; Christophe Isnard; Clara Sinel; Philippe Morand; Anne Dhalluin; Vincent Cattoir; Jean-Christophe Giard
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Colistin MIC variability by method for contemporary clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Janet A Hindler; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Irreproducible and uninterpretable Polymyxin B MICs for Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes.

Authors:  David Landman; Julius Salamera; John Quale
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Hilary D Marston; Dennis M Dixon; Jane M Knisely; Tara N Palmore; Anthony S Fauci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Escherichia coli Harboring mcr-1 and blaCTX-M on a Novel IncF Plasmid: First Report of mcr-1 in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick McGann; Erik Snesrud; Rosslyn Maybank; Brendan Corey; Ana C Ong; Robert Clifford; Mary Hinkle; Timothy Whitman; Emil Lesho; Kurt E Schaecher
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Rapid Detection of Polymyxin Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Patrice Nordmann; Aurélie Jayol; Laurent Poirel
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.883

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Detection of Enterobacterales resistant to polymyxins using Rapid Polymyxins NP test.

Authors:  Tanise Vendruscolo Dalmolin; Graziela Ávila Dias; Luiza Peres de Castro; Helena Ávila; Cibele Massotti Magagnin; Alexandre Prehn Zavascki; Daiana de Lima-Morales; Afonso Luís Barth
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Evaluation of an In-House Colistin NP Test for Use in Resource-Limited Settings.

Authors:  B Mitton; C Kingsburgh; M M Kock; N M Mbelle; K Strydom
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An Improved Medium for Colistin Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Konrad Gwozdzinski; Saina Azarderakhsh; Can Imirzalioglu; Linda Falgenhauer; Trinad Chakraborty
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid ResaCeftazidime-Avibactam Enterobacterales NP Test: Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility in Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Luozhu Feng; Yining Zhao; Zhuocheng Yao; Xiaodong Zhang; Shufang Zheng; Lijiang Chen; Ying Zhang; Lingbo Wang; Tieli Zhou; Jianming Cao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  Evaluation of two rapid phenotypical tests-Alifax rapid AST colistin test and Rapid Polymyxin NP test-for detection of colistin resistance in Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Julija Germ; Katja Seme; Tjasa Cerar; Veronika Krizan Hergouth; Mateja Pirs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.