| Literature DB >> 28747176 |
Xuewen Xu1, Minyang Chen1, Jing Ji1, Qiang Xu1, Xiaohua Qi1, Xuehao Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Waterlogging is a serious abiotic stress to plant growth because it results in the decline in the supplement of oxygen to submerged tissues. Although cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is sensitive to waterlogging, its ability to generate adventitious roots (ARs) facilitates gas diffusion and increases plant survival when the oxygen concentration is decreased. To gain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that enable de novo AR primordia emergence upon waterlogging, the RNA sequencing-based transcriptomic responses of two contrasting cucumber genotypes, Zaoer-N (waterlogging tolerant) and Pepino (waterlogging sensitive), which differed in their abilities to form AR were compared.Entities:
Keywords: Adventitious root primordia; Cucumber; Ethylene; RNA-seq; Waterlogging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28747176 PMCID: PMC5530484 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-017-1081-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Adventitious root formation on hypocotyls of cucumber seedlings. a Zaoer-N control; b Pepino control; c Zaoer-N waterlogging; d Pepino waterlogging. The water level was kept at about 4 cm (to the base of the first true leaves) above the soil for 2 days and then removed for photography
Mapping results of RNA sequencing reads of the cucumber ‘Zaoer-N’ and ‘Pepino’ 48 h after waterlogging (WL) treatment and relative non-waterlogged conditions (CK)
| Sample ID | Total reads | Mapped reads | Uniquely mapped reads | Number of mapped genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepino CK_1 | 33,225,482 | 29,848,764 | 28,965,262 | 19,723 |
| Pepino CK_2 | 46,772,956 | 41,794,366 | 40,689,862 | 21,056 |
| Pepino CK_3 | 37,596,070 | 33,665,760 | 32,653,010 | 19,991 |
| Pepino WL_1 | 36,258,376 | 32,161,091 | 29,798,229 | 20,038 |
| Pepino WL_2 | 36,982,414 | 32,480,793 | 30,615,432 | 20,052 |
| Pepino WL_3 | 41,844,460 | 35,644,650 | 29,096,668 | 20,247 |
| Zaoer-N CK_1 | 43,620,302 | 37,461,442 | 34,791,432 | 20,050 |
| Zaoer-N CK_2 | 35,427,694 | 30,387,272 | 29,598,977 | 19,870 |
| Zaoer-N CK_3 | 39,279,546 | 34,107,693 | 33,275,553 | 20,013 |
| Zaoer-N WL_1 | 42,364,332 | 36,674,382 | 35,372,191 | 20,346 |
| Zaoer-N WL_2 | 28,383,702 | 2,4680,987 | 23,953,530 | 19,918 |
| Zaoer-N WL_3 | 36,077,522 | 31,208,030 | 30,126,104 | 20,145 |
| Average | 38,152,738 | 33,342,936 | 31,578,021 | 20,121 |
Fig. 2Venn diagram of all genes expressed in hypocotyls of Zaoer-N and Pepino upon waterlogging (false discovery rate ≤ 0.01 and fold change ≥2) and their respective top five most significantly enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms
Fig. 3Comparison of protein folds change levels measured by RNA-seq and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) assays. The gene fold changes log2-values (Y-axis) were plotted against the qPCR fold changes log2-values (X-axis). The cucumber β-actin gene (GenBank AB010922) was used as an internal control to normalize the expression data. Each value denotes the mean relative level of expression of three biological replicates
Comparisons of the expression levels of representative nitrate transporter genes and non-symbiotic hemoglobin genes involved in nitrate assimilation and NO scavenging. ‘ND’ represents not detected
| Gene ID | Z WL vs Control | P WL vs Control | Functional annotation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2FC | FDR | Log2FC | FDR | ||
| Csa1G008530 | −1.54 | 1.46E-08 | −1.36 | 2.78E-04 | nitrate transporter 2.11 |
| Csa2G374640 | −2.81 | 2.39E-06 | −1.78 | 1.58E-03 | nitrate transporter 1.2-like |
| Csa4G007610 | −1.71 | 1.30E-07 | −1.51 | 1.93E-05 | nitrate transporter 6.1 |
| Csa3G027720 | 2.61 | 1.95E-04 | 2.48 | 5.24E-18 | nitrate transporter 1.1-like |
| Csa3G134770 | −2.15 | 2.29E-04 | 1.39 | 1.29E-03 | nitrate transporter 5.2-like |
| Csa5G161290 | 7.05 | 1.10E-06 | 7.42 | 3.41E-15 | nitrate transporter 6.3-like |
| Csa1G324370 | ND | ND | −1.08 | 8.85E-04 | nitrate transporter 6.2-like |
| Csa2G172510 | ND | ND | −1.07 | 1.85E-05 | nitrate transporter 5.2 |
| Csa2G416080 | ND | ND | −1.52 | 1.55E-04 | nitrate transporter 6.4 |
| Csa3G112250 | ND | ND | −2.11 | 4.16E-05 | nitrate transporter 4.3 |
| Csa5G647280 | ND | ND | −1.43 | 8.19E-05 | nitrate transporter 4.4 |
| Csa3G904070 | ND | ND | 1.04 | 1.59 E-03 | nitrate transporter 7.3-like |
| Csa3G134760 | 2.45 | 6.97E-04 | ND | ND | nitrate transporter 5.3 |
| Csa6G037500 | 1.23 | 1.53E-05 | ND | ND | nitrate transporter 3.1 |
| Csa6G404120 | 1.16 | 7.62 E-03 | ND | ND | nitrate transporter 4.6-like |
| Csa5G219390 | 1.24 | 2.96E-05 | ND | ND | nitrate transporter 5.1 |
| Csa6G187970 | 1.31 | 3.13E-06 | ND | ND | nitrate transporter Y 8.1 |
| Csa2G238880 | 3.38 | 2.43E-20 | 2.45 | 2.27E-07 | non-symbiotic hemoglobin 1 |
| Csa2G375770 | 3.29 | 1.81E-06 | 2.83 | 1.51E-27 | non-symbiotic hemoglobin 3 |
Fig. 4Ethylene production (left) and endogenous ABA (right) in Zaoer-N and Pepino 2 days after waterlogging treatment. ‘WL’ and ‘CK’ represent waterlogging treatment and control. Data is the average ± standard error (n = 3). Means with the same lowercase letter do not significantly differ by the least significant difference (LSD) test at p ≤ 0.05 with a completely randomized design
Comparisons of the expression levels of representative differentially expressed genes involved in auxin metabolism. ‘ND’ represents not detected
| Gene ID | Z WL vs Control | P WL vs Control | Functional annotation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log2FC | FDR | Log2FC | FDR | ||
| Csa3G198490 | ND | ND | 1.84 | 2.45 E-03 | Indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3.1 |
| Csa4G007100 | 2.53 | 1.07E-11 | 1.33 | 1.63 E-03 | Indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3.7 |
| Csa6G493310 | 2.79 | 1.86E-08 | ND | ND | indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3.1 |
| Csa1G025070 | −1.24 | 7.86 E-06 | −1.46 | 5.93E-08 | Auxin efflux carrier component 1 |
| Csa1G042820 | −1.21 | 3.22 E-06 | −1.05 | 3.58E-05 | Auxin efflux carrier component 1 |
| Csa4G430820 | 1.57 | 7.53 E-04 | ND | ND | Auxin efflux carrier component 1c |
| Csa5G576590 | ND | ND | −1.46 | 4.09E-08 | Auxin efflux carrier component 3 |
| Csa1G051690 | 1.99 | 4.17 E-03 | ND | ND | Indole-3-acetic acid-induced protein ARG7 |
| Csa5G534970 | ND | ND | −1.89 | 9.77 E-04 | Indole-3-acetic acid-induced protein ARG5 |
| Csa6G452710 | 6.07 | 2.51 E-08 | 5.07 | 2.38E-17 | Indole-3-acetic acid-induced protein ARG7 |
| Csa1G207820 | −1.51 | 4.6 E-05 | −1.17 | 9.23E-05 | Auxin-responsive protein IAA13 |
| Csa1G397130 | ND | ND | 3.18 | 9.69E-06 | Auxin-responsive protein IAA16 |
| Csa2G059200 | ND | ND | 1.75 | 2.85 E-04 | Auxin-responsive protein IAA33 |
| Csa2G170820 | ND | ND | −1.79 | 1.11E-11 | Auxin-responsive protein IAA13 |
| Csa2G200420 | −1.42 | 7.4 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-responsive protein |
| Csa3G134550 | ND | ND | −1.25 | 4.61E-05 | Auxin-responsive protein IAA13 |
| Csa3G143580 | −1.09 | 3.23 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-responsive protein IAA4 |
| Csa3G877650 | −1.22 | 7.92E-04 | ND | ND | Auxin-responsive protein IAA29 |
| Csa6G497220 | 1.11 | 1.13 E-04 | ND | ND | Auxin-responsive protein IAA9 |
| Csa2G258720 | −2.56 | 4.09 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein 6B |
| Csa2G258760 | 2.62 | 7.53 E-05 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein X10A |
| Csa2G379350 | ND | ND | −1.85 | 4.50 E-06 | Indole-3-pyruvate monooxygenase YUCCA4 |
| Csa3G118740 | −1.09 | 2.65 E-05 | −1.42 | 8.34E-08 | Auxin-induced protein X15 |
| Csa3G171820 | −1.03 | 1.83 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein |
| Csa3G821040 | ND | ND | 3.89 | 3.09E-06 | Auxin-regulated gene |
| Csa3G866530 | ND | ND | 2.64 | 2.66 E-04 | Auxin-induced protein 6B |
| Csa3G883020 | ND | ND | 2.34 | 1.07 E-04 | Auxin-induced protein 6B |
| Csa4G308640 | ND | ND | −1.20 | 3.00E-06 | Auxin transporter-like protein 4 |
| Csa4G433470 | ND | ND | 3.85 | 1.35E-06 | Auxin-regulated gene I |
| Csa4G556180 | −1.55 | 5.03 E-04 | −2.02 | 3.41E-09 | Auxin-induced protein 6B OS |
| Csa5G623890 | ND | ND | 1.52 | 1.10 E-04 | Auxin-regulated gene |
| Csa6G092560 | 2.32 | 1.22E-10 | 2.08 | 1.54E-16 | Auxin-induced protein 15A |
| Csa6G291920 | −1.11 | 3.99 E-06 | −1.10 | 1.72E-05 | Auxin response factor 4 |
| Csa6G518000 | −1.44 | 3.09 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-repressed 12.5 kDa protein |
| Csa6G518210 | −1.07 | 1.81 E-05 | −1.07 | 6.00E-05 | Auxin response factor 3 |
| Csa7G008430 | 1.19 | 4.21 E-04 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein 15A |
| Csa7G009020 | −2.40 | 4.67 E-05 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein X10A |
| Csa7G009150 | 2.50 | 1.39 E-05 | 2.54 | 2.40 E-04 | Auxin-induced protein 10A5 |
| Csa7G010800 | ND | ND | −1.30 | 1.71E-06 | Auxin transporter-like protein 5 |
| Csa7G329330 | −1.20 | 5.00 E-06 | −1.33 | 2.39 E-03 | Auxin response factor 9 |
| Csa7G378520 | −1.34 | 2.39 E-03 | ND | ND | Auxin-induced protein AUX28 |
| Csa7G448680 | 2.92 | 6.39E-15 | 1.68 | 4.30E-05 | Auxin responsive protein |
Fig. 5Response of transcription factors to waterlogging. a Graphical representations of waterlogging-regulated transcription factors based on their assigned protein families. b The group VII ethylene response factors in cucumber genome. The full-length protein sequences were analyzed with a neighbor-joining method. Numbers above branches represent the bootstrapped value from1000 replicates. RAP2.2 (AT3G14230), RAP2.12 (AT1G53910), HRE2 (AT2G47520), RAP2.3 (AT3G16770) and HRE1 (AT1G72360) were Arabidopsis group VII ethylene response factors. Asterisks indicate a conserved motif at the N-terminus initiated with Met1-Cys2, as identified by multiple sequence alignment. ‘Z WL vs control’ represents the fold change of the gene in hypocotyls of ‘Zaoer-N’ 2 days after waterlogging treatment than unwaterlogged control; ‘P WL vs control’ represents the fold change of the gene in hypocotyls of ‘Pepino’ 2 days after waterlogging treatment than unwaterlogged control