Literature DB >> 28746789

Cytogenetic clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with inferior prognosis.

Judith Neukirchen1, Michael Lauseker2, Barbara Hildebrandt3, Ann-Christin Nolting1, Jennifer Kaivers1, Guido Kobbe1, Norbert Gattermann1, Rainer Haas1, Ulrich Germing1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The karyotype of bone marrow cells at the time of diagnosis is a strong prognostic parameter for overall survival as well as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) progression in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, to the authors' knowledge, few data exist regarding the prognostic impact of cytogenetic clonal evolution during the course of MDS.
METHODS: The authors evaluated follow-up karyotype analyses in 549 patients from the Dusseldorf MDS Registry.
RESULTS: Clonal evolution was detectable in 24% of the entire cohort and in 18% of 294 patients receiving best supportive care. The authors noted a clear adverse effect of clonal evolution on the risk of leukemic transformation (hazard ratio, 2.233; P = .036) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.677; P<.001). The authors also analyzed the prognostic influence of subclones detectable at the time of diagnosis. Again, such a finding was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival and a higher 5-year-probability of acute myeloid leukemia progression (30% vs 22%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support the belief that follow-up karyotype analyses should be performed, especially in patients with lower-risk and intermediate-risk MDS, to identify those patients who are at higher risk of disease progression and therefore might benefit from earlier or more intensive treatment. Cancer 2017;123:4608-4616.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation; clonal evolution; myelodysplastic syndromes; prognosis; subclones

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28746789     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessing clonal haematopoiesis: clinical burdens and benefits of diagnosing myelodysplastic syndrome precursor states.

Authors:  Lukasz P Gondek; Amy E DeZern
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 18.959

2.  Assessing the Prognosis of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Authors:  Annika Kasprzak; Kathrin Nachtkamp; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  ICUS, IDUS, CHIP and CCUS: Diagnostic Criteria, Separation from MDS and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Peter Valent
Journal:  Pathobiology       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  3D Telomere Structure Analysis to DetectGenomic Instability and Cytogenetic Evolutionin Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Aline Rangel-Pozzo; Daiane Corrêa de Souza; Ana Teresa Schmid-Braz; Ana Paula de Azambuja; Thais Ferraz-Aguiar; Tamara Borgonovo; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Diagnosis and Screening.

Authors:  Francisco P Tria; Daphne C Ang; Guang Fan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29

6.  [Progress in pre-myelodysplastic syndrome conditions].

Authors:  W Zhang; R Fu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.