Literature DB >> 28746285

A Comparative Analysis of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 with a Demineralized Bone Matrix versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafts in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: Review of 501 Cases.

Jeffrey A Hammoudeh1, Artur Fahradyan, Daniel J Gould, Fan Liang, Thomas Imahiyerobo, Leo Urbinelli, JoAnna T Nguyen, William Magee, Stephen Yen, Mark M Urata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alveolar cleft reconstruction using iliac crest bone graft is considered standard of care for children with complete cleft lip and palate at the time of mixed dentition. Harvesting bone may result in donor-site morbidity and additional operating time and length of hospitalization. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 with a demineralized bone matrix is an alternative bone source for alveolar cleft reconstruction. The authors investigated the outcomes of rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for alveolar cleft reconstruction by reviewing postoperative surgical complications and cleft closure.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 258 rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix procedures (mean follow-up, 2.9 years) and 243 iliac crest bone graft procedures (mean follow-up, 4.1 years) on 414 patients over a 12-year period. The authors compared complications, canine eruption, and alveolar cleft closure between the two groups.
RESULTS: In the rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix group, one patient required prolonged intubation because of intraoperative airway swelling not thought to be caused by rhBMP-2, 36 reported facial swelling and one required outpatient steroids as treatment, and 12 had dehiscence; however, half of these complications resolved without intervention. Twenty-three of the 228 rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix patients and 28 of the 242 iliac crest bone graft patients required repeated surgery for alveolar cleft repair. Findings for canine tooth eruption into the cleft site through the graft were similar between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The rhBMP-2/demineralized bone matrix appears to be an acceptable alternative for alveolar cleft repair. The authors found no increase in serious adverse events with the use of this material. Local complications, such as swelling and minor wound dehiscence, predominantly improved without intervention. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28746285     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Impact of Frontier Development of Alveolar Bone Grafting on Orthodontic Tooth Movement.

Authors:  Yilan Miao; Yu-Cheng Chang; Nipul Tanna; Nicolette Almer; Chun-Hsi Chung; Min Zou; Zhong Zheng; Chenshuang Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Elie P Ramly; Allyson R Alfonso; Rami S Kantar; Maxime M Wang; J Rodrigo Diaz Siso; Amel Ibrahim; Paulo G Coelho; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

Review 5.  Extracellular Matrix Composition and Remodeling: Current Perspectives on Secondary Palate Formation, Cleft Lip/Palate, and Palatal Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katiúcia Batista Silva Paiva; Clara Soeiro Maas; Pâmella Monique Dos Santos; José Mauro Granjeiro; Ariadne Letra
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-12-13

6.  Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis.

Authors:  Basel Mahardawi; Kiatanant Boonsiriseth; Verasak Pairuchvej; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Simultaneous Closure of the Cleft Alveolus and Hard Palate with Concomitant Bone Grafting.

Authors:  Erinn N Kim; Whitney D Moss; Ryan P Kunkel; Duane K Yamashiro; Barbu R Gociman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-02-09

8.  Ectopic Laryngeal Ossification after Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.

Authors:  Kirsten Wong; Edward Damrose; Jennifer Long
Journal:  Surgeries (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-10

9.  Secondary bone grafting for alveolar clefts: surgical timing, graft materials, and evaluation methods.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Woonhyeok Jeong
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 10.  Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremie D Oliver; Shihai Jia; Leslie R Halpern; Emily M Graham; Emma C Turner; John S Colombo; David W Grainger; Rena N D'Souza
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 7.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.