Fei Chen1, Guolin Cui1, Shuxia Wang1, Manoj Kumar Mohan Nair2, Lihong He3, Xinyi Qi1, Xiangmin Han1, Hanqi Zhang1, Jing-Ren Zhang3, Jingliang Su1. 1. Key Laboratory of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonosis, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China. 2. Beckman Coulter, 36 Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. 3. Center for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Abstract
Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious intracellular pathogen that infects a wide range of host species and causes fatal pneumonic tularemia in humans. ftlA was identified as a potential virulence determinant of the F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) in our previous transposon screen, but its function remained undefined. Here, we show that an unmarked deletion mutant of ftlA was avirulent in a pneumonia mouse model with a severely impaired capacity to infect host cells. Consistent with its sequence homology with GDSL lipase/esterase family proteins, the FtlA protein displayed lipolytic activity in both E. coli and F. tularensis with a preference for relatively short carbon-chain substrates. FtlA thus represents the first F. tularensis lipase to promote bacterial infection of host cells and in vivo fitness. As a cytoplasmic protein, we found that FtlA was secreted into the extracellular environment as a component of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). Further confocal microscopy analysis revealed that the FtlA-containing OMVs isolated from F. tularensis LVS attached to the host cell membrane. Finally, the OMV-associated FtlA protein complemented the genetic deficiency of the ΔftlA mutant in terms of host cell infection when OMVs purified from the parent strain were co-incubated with the mutant bacteria. These lines of evidence strongly suggest that the FtlA lipase promotes F. tularensis adhesion and internalization by modifying bacterial and/or host molecule(s) when it is secreted as a component of OMVs.
Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious intracellular pathogen that infects a wide range of host species and causes fatal pneumonictularemia in humans. ftlA was identified as a potential virulence determinant of the F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) in our previous transposon screen, but its function remained undefined. Here, we show that an unmarked deletion mutant of ftlA was avirulent in a pneumoniamouse model with a severely impaired capacity to infect host cells. Consistent with its sequence homology with GDSL lipase/esterase family proteins, the FtlA protein displayed lipolytic activity in both E. coli and F. tularensis with a preference for relatively short carbon-chain substrates. FtlA thus represents the first F. tularensis lipase to promote bacterial infection of host cells and in vivo fitness. As a cytoplasmic protein, we found that FtlA was secreted into the extracellular environment as a component of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). Further confocal microscopy analysis revealed that the FtlA-containing OMVs isolated from F. tularensis LVS attached to the host cell membrane. Finally, the OMV-associated FtlA protein complemented the genetic deficiency of the ΔftlA mutant in terms of host cell infection when OMVs purified from the parent strain were co-incubated with the mutant bacteria. These lines of evidence strongly suggest that the FtlA lipase promotes F. tularensis adhesion and internalization by modifying bacterial and/or host molecule(s) when it is secreted as a component of OMVs.
Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes zoonotic tularemia. It infects a wide range of hosts, including amoebae, insects, fish, amphibians, birds, small mammals, lagomorphs and primates.[1, 2] Humans are accidental hosts that are infected by multiple routes, such as the bites of arthropod vectors, contact with infected animals, and inhalation of aerosolized bacteria.[3]
Francisella is divided into four subspecies: tularensis (type A), holarctica (type B), mediasiatica and novicida.[4, 5] The strains of types A and B cause the vast majority of human infections due to their relatively higher virulence.[6]
F. tularensis subsp. tularensis is classified as a category A biowarfare agent because of its extraordinarily low infectious dose and its ability to be aerosolized easily.[4] When humans inhale F. tularensis, the bacteria invade primarily alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells.[4] Once intracellular bacteria escape from the phagosome, they replicate in the cytosol until the host cell lyses, thereby allowing them to spread to other cells.[7, 8] The virulence determinants of F. tularensis remain largely undefined.[9] The known virulence factors include lipopolysaccharide (LPS),[10, 11] MglA/MglB,[12] AcpA,[13] DsbB,[14] FipB,[15] FipA,[16] FmvB,[17] MsrB,[18] catalase[19] and the proteins of the type-VI secretion system encoded by the Francisella pathogenicity island (FPI).[20] Several large genetic screens in animal infection models have also revealed many genes that may be involved in F. tularensis pathogenesis.[21, 22, 23, 24]Lipases (EC 3.1.1.3) and esterases (EC 3.1.1.1), collectively known as lipolytic enzymes, are widely found in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms.[25, 26] These enzymes are characterized by their ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of ester bonds from diverse substrates, as well as the reverse reactions;[27] thus, they have attracted enormous attention because of their applications as biocatalysts. Apart from their potential industrial uses, lipolytic enzymes have shown to contribute to the fitness and pathogenesis of animal and plant pathogens.[26, 28, 29] Pathogenic bacteria synthesize and secrete lipolytic enzymes to fulfill a variety of functions, including nutrient acquisition, colonization, invasion of host cells and modulation of host defense. The lipolytic enzymes produced by gut pathogens, such as Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter pylori, are able to degrade mucosal lipids and disrupt phospholipids on the epithelial surface, thereby altering mucosal integrity and promoting bacterial colonization and invasion.[30, 31, 32]Multiple lipolytic enzymes have also been shown to promote the pathogenesis of intracellular pathogens.[29] SseJ of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, a member of the GDSL lipase family, possesses the activities of phospholipase A, deacylase and glycerophospholipid: cholesterol acyltransferase.[33, 34, 35] It interacts with and modifies the host membrane to promote bacterial intracellular survival after being secreted from the Salmonella-containing vacuole into the host cell cytoplasm.[36]
Legionella pneumophila produces at least 15 cell-associated or secreted lipolytic enzymes.[37] These enzymes are involved in lipid metabolism, lipid degradation and pulmonary surfactant cleavage[38] and promote nutrient release and bacterial fitness. In silico analyses have revealed the presence of ~30 putative genes encoding lipolytic enzymes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.[39] Some of the gene products have been demonstrated to degrade lipids for bacterial nutrient acquisition,[40] induce immune responses, and contribute to cytolytic activity.[41]Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) represent spherical bi-layer structures naturally spun off from the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. These structures are not only produced under in vitro growth conditions[42] but are also detected in tissues and serum of infected host.[43, 44] Multiple functions have been attributed to OMVs, such as nutrient acquisition, inter-species communication and biofilm formation.[45] Moreover, OMVs have been implicated in promoting bacterial pathogenesis by stabilizing toxins,[46, 47] promoting bacterial adhesion to host cells,[48] and regulating the adaptive immunity of the host.[49] Although the OMVs are mostly composed of outer membrane and periplasmic proteins, some cytosolic and inner membrane proteins, RNA, DNA, peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are also present in the OMVs of certain bacteria.[45, 50] It has been well documented that the proteins in the OMVs are a result of selective recruitment because certain low-abundance molecules are highly enriched in the OMVs.[42] As an example, OMVs from Pseudomonas aeruginosa predominantly consist of B-band LPS.[51] A recent study has identified the DegP protease as a key regulator of protein composition in the OMVs of Vibrio cholera.[52] However, the mechanisms governing the biogenesis of bacterial OMVs remain obscure.[53, 54, 55]
F. tularensis subsp. novicida and philomiragia (referred to hereafter as F. novicida and F. philomiragia, respectively) are able to produce OMVs, which contain hundreds of proteins.[56, 57] However, the functional impact of the OMVs on Francisella pathogenesis is unclear.In our previous in vivo screen of virulence factors by signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM),[22] we identified 95 genes in F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) that are associated with lung infection. Among these are the genes in the capBCA and protease loci, which were subsequently confirmed to be necessary for F. tularensis LVS growth in macrophages and mouse organs.[22, 58] The contribution of many other genes to Francisella pathogenesis remains to be defined. This study reports our analysis of FTL_0430 (named ftlA), one of the 95 genes identified as potential virulence factors of F. tularensis LVS in the same study.[22] The unmarked deletion mutant of ftlA was significantly impaired in intracellular growth and fitness in a mouselung infection model. We further showed that ftlA encodes a lipase with a preference for short-carbon substrates. Finally, our data also revealed that FtlA is discharged as a component of FrancisellaOMVs. The OMA-associated FtlA is able to enhance F. tularensis internalization in cultured macrophages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
The F. tularensis subsp. holarctica LVS was kindly provided by Karen Elkins. LVS and its derivatives were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) or brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth supplemented with 0.1% glucose and 1% IsoVitaleX in a shaker at 37 °C, or on Mueller-Hinton II chocolateagar (MHA) plates containing the same supplements. When necessary, kanamycin (10 μg/mL) and hygromycin (200 μg/mL) were added to the medium for selection purposes. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or on agar plates. Antibiotics were added as previously described.[22]
Antibody generation and Western blotting
Antisera against Francisella FtlA, FopA and IglC were prepared with recombinant proteins essentially as described.[58] FtlA was expressed as GST fusion protein (GST-FtlA) by amplifying the ftlA open reading frame from LVS genomic DNA with the primer pair Pr1651/Pr1652 (Supplementary Table S1), and cloning it into the plasmid pGEX-2T. fopA and iglC were similarly cloned into plasmid pET-32a (Novagen) with primer pair Pr2008/Pr2009 and Pr2006/Pr2007 (Supplementary Table S1), respectively. The resulting plasmids were transformed into E. coliBL21(DE3) and processed to produce proteins. Recombinant proteins were purified by affinity chromatography with glutathione-Sepharose (GST-FtlA) and Ni-Agarose (His-FopA and His-IglC) according to manufacturers’ instructions. To generate antiserum against FtlA, 500 μg of purified GST-FtlA in 500 μL PBS was emulsified with an equal volume of complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and injected subcutaneously into New Zealand White rabbits. The rabbits were boosted twice at 2-week intervals with a similar amount of protein emulsified with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). Three weeks after the third immunization, the rabbits were anesthetized and cardiac punctured to collect blood. Serum was removed and stored at −80 °C for use. Antisera against FopA and IglC were generated in a similar manner in BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old) using the purified His-tagged FopA and IglC, respectively.Western blotting was performed as described.[58] Antisera against FtlA, FopA and IglC were used at dilutions of 1:1000, 1:5000 and 1:1000, respectively. Horseradishperoxide (HRP)-conjugated second antibodies (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) were used at dilutions of 1:5000.
Construction of F. tularensis ftlA deletion mutant and complementation plasmid
A ftlA deletion mutant was constructed by counterselection as described.[22] The upstream and downstream fragments of ftlA were amplified using LVS genomic DNA and the primer pairs Pr1089/Pr1090 and Pr1091/Pr1092 (Supplementary Table S1), respectively, and joined by overlapping PCR. The fusion was digested with MspI and DraI, and cloned into the ClaI/SmaI sites in the pBlueScript II SK (−) plasmid to obtain pBS::ΔftlA, resulting in plasmid pST1146. The pST1146 insert was sub-cloned into the Apal/BamHI sites of the suicide vector pMP590[59] to create plasmid pST1147. This plasmid was electroporated into strain LVS to generate an unmarked deletion in ftlA by counterselection with 5% sucrose. The ftlA deletion in the resulting strain ST1705 was confirmed by DNA sequencing and Western blotting using rabbit antiserum against FtlA. The growth kinetics of the mutant in broth cultures were tested by optical density analysis.To construct ftlA complemented strain, the full-length gene was amplified using primer pair Pr1601/Pr1602 (Supplementary Table S1) and cloned into the NdeI site of the pMP633 shuttle vector, in which the ATG of the NdeI site corresponds to the start codon of the hygromycin gene in pMP633.[59] The resulting plasmid pST1729 was verified by DNA sequencing and electroporated into strain ST1705. Transformants were selected on MHA plates containing hygromycin (200 μg/mL). One of the resulting transformants, ST1738, was used for further characterization.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
F. tularensis LVS, ΔftlA mutant (ST1705), and in trans complemented strain (ST1738) were individually cultured in MHB to mid-log phase (OD600=1.0). Bacterial RNA was isolated from cultures using TRIzol reagent (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) and subjected to DNase I (NEB, England, Ipswich) treatment to eliminate genomic DNA contamination.To determine whether the five genes (FTL_0427 to FTL_0431) are cotranscribed, the junction fragments between these genes were amplified by RT-PCR. The primer pairs covering the junction of adjacent genes were designed using the Primer express software (Primer 3 Plus) and are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The intergenic cDNAs were synthesized with the LVS RNA extract using a Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and primers Pr2031, Pr2033, Pr2035 and Pr2037, respectively. The junction PCR products were amplified using the synthesized cDNAs and primer pairs (Supplementary Table S1).To determine whether the deletion of ftlA (FTL_0430) affects the transcription of its adjacent genes, transcription of the four genes (FTL_0427, FTL_0428, FTL_0429 and FTL_0431) in the operon was analyzed by qRT-PCR in a two-step reaction. First, cDNA was synthesized using the Reverse Transcription System with the above-described bacterial RNA and random primers according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. qPCR assays were performed with SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) using the Light Cycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with a program of 40 cycles, with each cycle consisting of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 20 s. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All reactions were performed in triplicate with three independent RNA preparations. The transcript levels of the target genes were normalized to the levels of 16S rRNA. The results were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.[60] Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test.
Detection of lipase activity
To detect the lipase activity of FtlA, the ftlA gene was amplified using primer pair Pr2000/Pr2001 (Supplementary Table S1) and cloned into pET-32a. The plasmid (pST2000) was transformed into E. coliBL21 (DE3) to generate strain ST2000. As a control, the active site serine (Ser13) within the conserved lipase motif of FtlA was mutated by site-directed mutagenesis. The serine of the FtlA was converted to alanine (TCT to GCT) using the primer pair Pr2002/Pr2003 (Supplementary Table S1). The E. coli strain ST2001 expressing mutated FtlA (FtlAS13A) was constructed as described above.Lipase activity in bacterial cells was detected by a plate assay using tributyrin as a lipase indicator essentially as described.[61] Briefly, the lipase reporter plates were prepared as follows: 1 mL of tributyrin (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 100 mL of LB agar for E. coli; the mixture was emulsified by sonication immediately before autoclaving. When the temperature of the medium was stabilized to 55 °C after autoclaving, ampicillin and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside were added to final concentrations of 100 μg/mL and 1 mM, respectively. The mixture was used to prepare the reporter plates for lipase activity. Lipase activity was indicated by the formation of a clear zone after 10 μL of mid-log bacterial cultures (~0.6 OD600) was spotted and incubated at 37 °C for 10 days. For the lipolytic assay of F. tularensis LVS and its isogenic derivatives, 2 × Chamberlain’s chemical defined medium (CCDM) was prepared and sterilized by filtration.[62] The medium was mixed with an equal volume of agarose emulsified with 2% tributyrin and dispensed onto the plates. Bacterial cultures (~0.8 OD600) were spotted and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for seven days.
Protease accessibility
Protease accessibility to bacterial proteins in the cellular or OMV context was performed essentially as described.[63] Briefly, late-log phase bacteria (~2 × 109 CFU/mL) were pelleted by centrifugation at 8000g for 10 min at 4 °C and gently resuspended. Proteinase K (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in proteolysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM CaCl2) was added to final concentrations of 250–1000 μg/mL, or 0.1% Triton X-100 and proteinase K (to a final concentration of 250 μg/mL) were added. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, the reaction was stopped by the addition of a 0.5 mM protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). As a negative control, proteolysis buffer alone was added to the cell suspension. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation (8000g for 10 min at 4 °C), washed twice with PBS containing the 0.5 mM protease inhibitor cocktail, and resuspended for immunoblot analysis. The target proteins were detected with rabbit antiserum against FtlA or FopA by Western blotting.Protease accessibility of FtlA in freshly purified OMVs was assessed with proteinase K alone or with SDS (0.02%) for 30 min at room temperature as described.[57] Reactions were terminated by the addition of a 0.5 mM protease inhibitor cocktail. FtlA in the samples was detected with anti-FtlA serum by Western blotting.
Subcellular fractionation
Subcellular fractionation of F. tularensis proteins was carried out as described.[57]
F. tularensis LVS was cultured to the exponential phase in MHB, pelleted by centrifugation (8000g for 10 min at 4 °C), and resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl). Bacteria were disrupted by sonication, and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 10 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. The lysate was filtered with a 0.45-μm pore size filter unit (Merck) and subjected to ultracentrifugation (Beckman Optima L-100XP, rotor Type 70 Ti) for 1 h at 100 000 g at 4 °C to pellet the membrane components. The supernatant (soluble protein fraction) was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in 1% sarkosyl (Sigma-Aldrich). The sarkosyl-soluble fraction (inner membrane) and sarkosyl-insoluble fraction (outer membrane) were further separated by ultracentrifugation for 1 h at 100 000 g at 4 °C. The protoplasts and the periplasmic content were separated by an osmotic shock treatment as previously described.[64] Briefly, bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation (8000g, 10 min at 4 °C), suspended and washed twice with cold Tris–HCl buffer (20 mM, pH 7.5), and then suspended in a hypertonic solution containing 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 20% sucrose, and 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Lysozyme was added to a final concentration of 200 μg/mL. After incubation on ice for 30 min, the cells were pelleted at 12 000 g, 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was labeled the periplasmic fraction. All the fractions were separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and analyzed by Western blotting.
Purification of outer membrane vesicles
OMVs were isolated from F. tularensis LVS and its derivatives virtually as described.[57] Briefly, F. tularensis LVS and isogenic ΔftlA mutant were cultured in BHI broth to the late exponential phase. Bacteria were removed by centrifugation (8000g, 10 min), and the supernatant was filtered using a filter with a 0.45-μm pore. The resulting solution was initially concentrated with an Amicon Ultra-15 filtration unit (Merck), and then subjected to ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g for 1 h to pellet the vesicles. The pelleted OMVs were resuspended in buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 0.05% sodium azide). For the gradient density separation, 0.5 mL of the OMV suspension was mixed with 1.5 mL of OptiPrep (60% iodixanol, Axis-Shield) to adjust the OptiPrep concentration to 40% (w/v) before being placed at the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube. OptiPrep gradients of 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% and 0% were layered over the vesicle fractions and subjected to centrifugation at 100 000 g for 16 h at 4 °C in a swinging-bucket rotor (Beckman Optima L-100XP, rotor Type SW 41Ti). Equal fractions were collected from the tops of the tubes. A portion of each fraction was probed by Western blotting with FtlA antiserum. Simultaneously, 10 μL of each fraction was spotted onto LB plates containing tributyrin indicator for lipase activity detection as described above. Fractions containing FtlA were diluted and recovered by ultracentrifugation (100 000 g, 1 h at 4 °C). Pellets were resuspended in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) for morphological and biochemical characterization.
Detection of OMV attachment to host cells
Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of OMV attachment to RAW264.7 cells was conducted as described,[65] with some modifications. RAW264.7 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well-plates. Cell monolayers were treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) (5 mM) or RPMI 1640 medium alone for 1 h. After treatment, the cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 25 μg of OMVs purified from LVS for 1 h at 37 °C. The cells were then washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (v/v) for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were again washed three times with PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumen in PBS (blocking buffer) for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with rabbit anti-FtlA serum (1:2500) and a monoclonal antibody against caveolin-1 (1:500) (Abcam, UK) in blocking buffer for 1 h and then washed with PBS. DyLight 488-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG (1:500) and DyLight 549-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500) (EarthOx, USA) were added and incubated for 30 min. After three washes with PBS, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole was added to stain the cell nuclei. The coverslips were washed with PBS, mounted on glass slides and sealed with neutral resin. Samples were visualized under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710).
Transmission electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out essentially as described.[56] OMVs isolated from F. tularensis LVS and its derivatives were mounted on carbon-coated copper grids, incubated for 10 min, and washed twice with water. Uranyl acetate (2%, pH 4.0) was applied to the grids for negative staining. The stained grids were subjected to TEM analysis with a JEM-1400 microscope at 80 kV.
Host cell infection
Infection of host cells by F. tularensis LVS and its derivatives was assessed in murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) or mouse macrophage-like RAW264.7 or human lung epithelial A549 cell lines in 24-well cell culture plates as described previously.[56] RAW264.7 and A549 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C with 5% CO2. BMDMs were isolated from the femurs of 6–8-week-old female BALB/c mice and differentiated into macrophages in RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for five days as previously described.[66] Cell monolayers were washed with PBS, and bacterial suspensions were added at the indicated multiplicity of infection (MOI). After 1 h of incubation at 37 °C, the cells were washed three times with PBS, and extracellular bacteria were killed by incubation in RPMI 1640 medium containing gentamicin (50 μg/mL) for 1 h at 37 °C. After the residual gentamicin was removed by extensive rinsing, the monolayers were lysed to enumerate the viable intracellular bacteria (or colony forming units—CFU) by plating the lysates on MHA plates.To determine bacterial adhesion, RAW264.7 cells were pre-treated with cytochalasin D (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 μg/mL for 1 h to disrupt actin polymerization and block the internalization of bacteria as described.[67] The cells were then infected with F. tularensis LVS or its derivatives. After incubation at 37 °C for 2 h, the infected cells were lysed to enumerate the adherent bacteria (CFU).The impact of OMVs on the ability of F. tularensis LVS to infect host cells was tested as described.[65] Monolayers of RAW264.7 cells in a 24-well-plate were infected with F. tularensis LVS or its isogenic mutant at an MOI of 500. Simultaneously, OMVs purified from the supernatants of the LVS or the ΔftlA mutant were added to final concentrations of 10–100 μg/mL. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, the extracellular bacteria were killed by applying gentamicin (50 μg/mL), and viable intracellular bacteria were quantified as described above.
Mouse infection
Animal infection with F. tularensis was conducted as previously described.[22] Groups of five six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratory, Beijing, China) were anesthetized with Zoletil50 (Virbac, Sante Animale, France) by subcutaneous administration, infected intranasally with F. tularensis LVS or its derivatives, and monitored daily for mortality for 21 days.For the in vivo growth study, mice were inoculated intranasally with 3 × 103 CFU of F. tularensis LVS, or its isogenic derivatives ST1705 or ST1738. To maintainthe antibiotic selection on the in trans complementation plasmid under in vivo condition, mice infected with ST1738 were administered hygromycin (50 μg/mouse) by gavage every day after infection. The bacterial burdens in the lung, spleen and liver (n=5) were quantified at 4 and 7 days after infection as described.[58] To evaluate the histopathological changes caused by the deletion mutant, three mice in each group were euthanized on day 7 post-infection. Lungs were collected and fixed with 10% buffered formalin, processed using standard histological methods, and the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Ethics statement
Animal experiments were conducted under protocols approved by the China Agricultural University Animal Ethics Committee, in accordance with the guidelines of the Review of Welfare and Ethics of Laboratory Animals approved by the Beijing Municipality Administration Office of Laboratory Animals.
Statistical analysis
All experiments represent at least three replicates, with each experiment performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed using an unpaired t-test. The results of the representative experiments are presented as the mean±sd. Significant differences are defined by P values (two tailed) <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), <0.001 (***).
RESULTS
ftlA is required for F. tularensis LVS virulence in mice
Our previous STM study identified four independently generated mutants of ftlA that were significantly attenuated in the lung infection model.[22] The four STM mutants each carried a transposon insertion in a unique position in the coding region of FtlA (between nucleotides 102–103, 147–148, 227–228 and 734–735). However, the function of FtlA is completely unknown. ftlA is the fourth gene in an operon of five genes, which consists of FTL_0427 (chromosome partition protein A, parA), FTL_0428 (chromosome partition protein B, parB), FTL_0429 (putative class I glutamine amidotransferase), FTL_0430 (Francisella tularensis lipase A, ftlA) and FTL_0431 (putative hydrolase). The genes and their order are highly conserved among the sequenced genomes of F. tularensis. The five genes are cotranscribed under in vitro culture conditions as the predicted intergenic fragments were produced by RT-PCR amplification using the total RNA of LVS as template (Supplementary Figure S1A). No PCR product was generated in the absence of reverse transcription, which eliminated the genomic contamination. Because the transposon used in our previous study terminates the transcription of the sequence downstream of its insertion site gene,[22] we first attempted to clarify the possibility of the polar effect associated with these ΔftlA mutants by constructing an unmarked deletion mutant in F. tularensis LVS (strain ST1705), in which a 771-bp coding sequence of FtlA was removed (Supplementary Figure S1B). The expression of FtlA in ST1705 was successfully restored by in trans complementation, as assessed by Western blotting with rabbit antiserum against FtlA (Supplementary Figure S1C). In vitro culture experiments showed that the growth kinetics of ST1705 were indistinguishable from those of the parent strain in CCDM or MHB (Supplementary Figure S1D), indicating that FtlA is not required for normal growth in vitro. In addition, transcription of the adjacent genes (FTL_0427, FTL_0428, FTL_0429 and FTL_0431) was analyzed by qRT-PCR, and no significant changes were observed in the transcript levels of the four genes between LVS and ΔftlA (ST1705) or between LVS and the in trans complemented strain (ST1738) (Supplementary Figure S2).We next assessed the impact of the ftlA deletion on Francisella pathogenicity in a mouselung infection model. While all the mice infected with 5 × 103 CFU of LVS died during an observation period of 21 days, intranasal inoculation with a range of different infection doses (1 × 103 to 107 CFU/mouse) with ST1705 revealed a median lethal dose of ≥107 CFU (Figure 1A). This severe attenuation phenotype of strain ST1705 confirmed our previous finding with the ftlA transposon insertion mutants.[22] Consistent with this conclusion, the mice infected with ST1705 carried dramatically lower bacterial load in the lung, liver and spleen on days 4 and 7 post-infection. There were more than 27-fold and 38-fold differences between the lung (Figure 1B) and spleen (Figure 1C) values in mice infected with ST1705 and LVS on day 4. The ΔftlA mutant was not recovered from the liver at this timepoint (limit of detection, 300 CFU/liver)(Figure 1D). A significant attenuation phenotype of ΔftlA mutant in vivo growth was also observed in terms of bacterial load in the lung, liver, and spleen on day 7 post-infection, although the overall levels of bacterial burden detected on day 7 were lower than those obtained on day 4. The in vivo growth defect of the ΔftlA mutant was partially rescued by ftlA in trans complementation. In comparison with the ΔftlA mutant, the bacterial loads in the lung and liver increased significantly in the mice infected with strain ST1738 (Figures 1B and 1D).
Figure 1
Impact of ftlA deletion on the in vivo growth and pathogenicity of F. tularensis LVS. (A) The ΔftlA mutant of LVS is highly attenuated in mice. Groups of BALB/c mice (n=5) were intranasally infected with the indicated doses of wild-type LVS and ST1705, and the survival of the mice was plotted over time for 21 days. (B,C) The bacterial burden of the ΔftlA mutant ST1705 was significantly lower than that of LVS in mouse organs. BALB/c mice (n=5) were infected intranasally with 3 × 103 CFU of wild-type LVS, ST1705 or ST1738, and tissues were collected on days 4 and 7 post-infection.The tissue homogenates were diluted and spread onto MHA plates for CFU analysis. All the values are presented as the mean log CFU±sd. P values were calculated using an unpaired t-test, comparing the values obtained for ST1705 with those of the parent strain LVS or ST1738.
We also compared the pathological changes in the lungs of the mice infected with LVS or ST1705. The histopathological evaluation revealed a consistent correlation between the severity of the pathology and bacterial burden in the lungs on day 7 post-infection. The lungs of the LVS-infectedmice exhibited severe pathological damages with sloughed mucosa, erythrocytes and inflammatory cells in the bronchi. The mice infected with LVS displayed marked peribronchial and perivesicular inflammatory cell infiltrations with large numbers of erythrocytes in the alveoli. In contrast, the lungs of the mice infected with ST1705 only showed relatively minor peribronchial and perivesicular inflammatory cell infiltration.This evidence indicates that FtlA is essential for the in vivo fitness and virulence of F. tularensis LVS in this lung infection model.
ftlA contributes to Francisella attachment and entry into host cells
To further explain the severe attenuation of the ΔftlA mutant in the lung infection model, we tested the impact of ftlA deletion on Francisella attachment and entry into host cells using multiple cell models. The results showed that the ΔftlA mutant exhibited an altered infection profile in all tested cells, compared with wild-type LVS (Figures 2A–C). The A549 cells infected with LVS exhibited seven-fold more intracellular bacteria than those infected with the ΔftlA mutant ST1705. The in trans complementation plasmid restored the infectivity of the ΔftlA mutant nearly to the level of the parent strain at 3 h after the initiation of infection (Figure 2A). Despite the relatively smaller scale, the mutant also displayed a significant reduction of the level of intracellular bacteria compared with LVS 24 h after the onset of infection. Consistent distinct patterns of LVS and ST1705 were also observed in the levels of intracellular bacteria in cultures of mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (Figure 2B) and RAW264.7mouse macrophages (Figure 2C). This result showed that ftlA was necessary for the infectivity of F. tularensis LVS at the cellular level. Gradual loss of the shuttle plasmid in the complementation strain due to the absence of antibiotic selection might be responsible for the relatively lower levels of intracellular bacteria compared with the parent strain.
Figure 2
Contribution of FtlA to host cell infection. (A–C) LVS and mutant derivatives were used to infect human lung epithelium A549 cells, murine bone marrow-derived macrophages or RAW264.7 cells in 24-well plates at a MOI of 100. The cells were lysed at 3 and 24 h post-infection and plated on MHA plates for enumeration of bacterial CFU. (D) RAW264.7 cells were treated with cytochalasin D to inhibit internalization and then infected with LVS or ΔftlA mutant at the indicated MOIs. The cells were extensively washed and lysed at 2 h post-infection, and the CFUs of the bacteria that adhered to the RAW264.7 cells were enumerated as above. All the values are presented as the mean log CFU±sd of triplicate samples. P values were calculated using an unpaired t-test, comparing the value of ST1705 with that of the parent strain LVS or ST1738.
To determine whether the impaired infectivity of ST1705 was due to partial loss of bacterial adhesion to host cells, we performed adhesion experiments with host cells pre-treated with cytochalasin D, an agent that inhibits actin microfilament polymerization, to uncouple adhesion from internalization. A previous study has reported that treatment with cytochalasin D significantly blocks Francisella entry into host cells.[67] The results showed that cell-associated numbers of wild-type LVS increased 24-fold and 22-fold compared with the ftlA deletion mutant, at MOIs of 100:1 and 1000:1, respectively (Figure 2D). Taken together, these results demonstrate that ftlA contributes to host cell adhesion and entry by F. tularensis.
FtlA is a new lipase in the GDSL esterase/lipase family
ftlA consists of 882 base pairs (bps) encoding a protein with 293 amino acids. It is annotated as ‘phospholipase’ in the current version of the LVS genome (NC_007880.1 updated on August 12, 2015) because the protein contains a highly conserved sequence motif of GDSL at the amino (N) terminus, a signature of lipolytic enzymes or lipases in the GDSL family of serine esterases/lipases.[25, 68] FtlA also possesses five successive conserved blocks (I–V) with four strictly conserved catalytic residues, Ser13-Gly68-Asn114-His272, in blocks I, II, III and V, respectively (Figure 3A). The conserved serine (Ser13), aspartic acid (Asp269) and histidine (His272) are predicted to form the catalytic triad of the lipase active site, and the catalytic serine residue is located at the amino terminus.
Figure 3
Identification of the lipolytic activity in FtlA. (A) Sequence alignment of various bacterial GDSL family serine esterase/lipases depicting five consensus blocks (marked at the top) shared by members using MegAlign of the DNAstar-Lasergene package (version 10). Conserved residues are highlighted with black characters. The residues of the catalytic triad and oxyanion hole are indicated by filled and open circles, respectively. The segments around the five conserved blocks are shown after removal of the junction sequences. FtlA: Francisella tularensis (CAJ78870), TesA: Escherichia coli (EIQ72915), PLB: Moraxella bovis (AAK53448), McaP: Moraxella catharralis (AAP97134), EstA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AAB61674), ApeE: Salmonella thyphimurium (AAL19521), Serratia liquefaciens EstA (AAO38760), EstE: Xanthomonas vesicatoria (AAP49217), Lip1: Xenorhabdus luminescens (P40601). (B) Lipolytic activity of recombinant E. coli on LB agar plates. E. coli harboring plasmid pST2000 (ST2000), pST2001 (ST2001) or empty plasmid (vector) were spotted on LB plates containing tributyrin as an indicator. Halo formation was observed around the spots of ST2000 after incubation for ten days at 37 °C. (C) The lipolytic activity of F. tularensis LVS and its derivatives. LVS, ΔftlA mutant (ST1705) and trans-complemented strain (ST1738) were spotted onto CCDM plates containing tributyrin. The lipase activity in each spot is indicated by the size of the clear zone after incubation for seven days at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
On the basis of this prediction, we first tested the potential lipolytic activity of FtlA in E. coli by generating an expression construct of FtlA in pET-32a. When tested on the plate containing emulsified tributyrin, the E. coli strain harboring the FtlA-expressing plasmid (pST2000) showed a clear zone of halo around the colonies (Figure 3B, middle), which is indicative of lipolytic activity as previously reported.[61] In contrast, no halo was observed around the colonies of the E. coli strain containing the empty vector (Figure 3B, bottom). To confirm this result, an S13A ftlA mutation construct was generated by substituting its 13th serine residue with an alanine. In agreement with the importance of the serine residue in the lipase activity of the GDSL family proteins, no halo was observed around the colonies of the E. coli strain carrying pST2001 (Figure 3B, top). These data demonstrate that recombinant FtlA is a lipolytic enzyme of lipase in E. coli.In a similar manner, we further determined whether FtlA is a functional lipase in F. tularensis. Approximately the same CFU of LVS and its isogenic derivatives were spotted onto CCDM agar containing tributyrin. As shown in Figure 3C, the ΔftlA mutant ST1705 produced smaller lipolytic zones around its colonies compared with the wild-type LVS strain after 7 days of incubation. When the ftlA gene was introduced into the ΔftlA mutant by in trans complementation, the lipolytic zone was restored to the same level as that of the parent strain (Figure 3C). Together with the lipase activity of the recombinant FtlA in E. coli, this result showed that FtlA is a functional lipase in F. tularensis LVS. Because the ftlA gene is highly conserved in F. tularensis, we have thus designated it
lipase A (ftlA).
FtlA is a cytoplasmic protein
Bioinformatics analysis suggested that FtlA is a cytoplasmic protein since it lacks an apparent signal sequence or transmembrane region. However, this prediction is somewhat paradoxical to the functional contribution of this protein in promoting bacterial adhesion and entry into host cells (Figure 2). Thus, we investigated the cellular localization of the FtlA protein using multiple approaches. First, we determined the potential exposure of FtlA at the cell surface by treating the intact LVS cells with proteinase K, a protease that has been previously used to detect the surface availability of bacterial proteins.[63] Western blotting revealed that treatment of intact LVS cells with proteinase K resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of FopA, an outer membrane protein of F. tularensis,[69] but the amount of IglC, a cytoplasmic protein of F. tularensis,[70] was not obviously affected by the treatment (Figure 4A), indicating that proteinase K selectively degraded surface-exposed proteins. However, similar treatment with the protease did not show a dose-dependent marginal decrease in FtlA with intact bacterial cells (Figure 4A). This result suggested that FtlA is not surface-exposed, as predicted by bioinformatics analysis of its sequence.
Figure 4
Subcellular localization of FtlA. (A) Protease inaccessibility of FtlA. Intact cells of LVS were first incubated with different concentrations of protease K (pK) with or without Triton X-100 permeabilization. FtlA, IglC (cytoplasmic protein control), and FopA (outer membrane protein control) were detected in the cell lysates by Western blotting. (B) Distribution of FtlA in subcellular fractions. Subcellular fractionation was performed with intact cells of LVS. FtlA, IglC and FopA were detected in the whole cell lysate (LVS) or subcellular fractions of LVS by Western blotting. The sizes of the proteins are indicated on the right in kDa.
We further determined the precise subcellular localization of FtlA by subcellular fractionation of the LVS proteins into cytoplasmic, inner membrane, periplasmic, and outer membrane fractions. Consistent with its outer membrane localization, FopA was abundantly detected in the outer membrane fraction (Figure 4B). However, FtlA, along with IglC, was detected in the cytoplasmic and inner membrane fractions but not the outer membrane fraction. This finding confirmed our conclusion from the proteinase K treatment experiment (Figure 4A) that FtlA is localized in the bacterial cytosol and absent from the surface of F. tularensis LVS.
FtlA is associated with outer membrane vesicles
A recent proteomics study has reported that the FtlA orthologue of F. novicida is associated with OMVs.[57] To test whether FtlA is released as a component of the OMVs in F. tularensis LVS, we isolated OMVs from the exponential-phase supernatants of LVS or its isogenic derivatives by ultracentrifugation. Western blotting detected FtlA and FopA in the OMV preparations of LVS and the ftlA complementation strain ST1738 culture supernatant, but not in that of the FtlA-deficient strain ST1705 (Figure 5A). FopA is one of the proteins associated with the OMVs of F. novicida.[56] In addition, FtlA was not detected in the culture supernatant after the OMVs were removed by ultracentrifugation (see Supplementary Material and Supplementary Figure S3). We subsequently characterized the OMVs that were further purified from the initial OMV preparation using density-gradient fractionation. Transmission electron microscopy examination of the purified OMVs revealed spherical and rod-shaped vesicles ranging from 50 to 300 nm in diameter (Figure 5B), resembling the OMVs that are isolated from F. novicida[57] and other bacteria.[71] In agreement with the results obtained from the initial OMV preparations, FtlA was immunologically detected in density-gradient fractions 2, 3 and 4 of strain LVS (Figure 5C, top panel). This result is consistent with previous findings showing that bacterial OMVs tend to have a relatively low density/high buoyancy.[56] In accordance with this result, lipase activity was also observed in the same LVS fractions (Figure 5C, middle panel). In contrast, the corresponding OMV fractions of the ΔftlA mutant exhibited much weaker enzymatic activity (Figure 5C, bottom panel). This result correlates well with the lipolytic behavior of the viable bacteria on plates containing tributyrin (Figure 3C).
Figure 5
Detection of FtlA in OMVs isolated from F. tularensis LVS. (A) Detection of FtlA in OMVs by Western blotting. The proteins in the OMVs isolated from LVS and its derivatives were detected with specific antibody against FtlA, IglC, or FopA. (B) Electron micrograph of density-gradient purified F. tularensis LVS OMVs (negative stained), showing round (open arrow) and rod-shaped (filled arrow) OMVs. Bar=500 nm. (C) Analysis of FtlA in the density-gradient-purified OMVs. Crude OMVs extracted from the culture supernatants of LVS or ΔftlA mutant ST1705 were further purified by density-gradient centrifugation. FtlA in the fractions (1–12, top panel) was analyzed by Western blotting as in A. The lipase activity in each OMV fraction (middle and bottom panels) was detected on plates containing tributyrin as in Figure 3. The formation of a halo zone was used as an indicator of lipolytic activity. The sizes of the proteins are indicated on the right in kDa.
The OMVs of the LVS spotted on the tributyrin plates were observed to form the halo structure, an indicator of lipase activity, much faster than live bacteria. The haloes of the fresh OMV preparations were visible as early as 3 h and reached the greatest intensity within 48 h after being spotted on the plates. However, it took at least 72 h for the broth cultures of LVS to form visible haloes post-inoculation. Since the fast halo formation did not occur with OMVs isolated from the FtlA-deficient strain ST1705 (Figure 5C), this result suggested that the OMVs contained FtlA protein with a relatively high concentration and/or activity. Since our earlier trial to define the enzymatic activity of FtlA using recombinant FtlA was unsuccessful (not shown), we tested the substrate specificity of FtlA using the OMV preparations (Supplementary Materials). The freshly prepared OMVs of the wild-type LVS hydrolyzed p-nitrophenyl butyrate (C4) efficiently (Supplementary Figure S4), and a sharp decrease in enzymatic activity was observed for acyl chain lengths greater than ten carbons. In comparison, the hydrolytic activity toward the corresponding р-NP ester was significantly lower for the OMVs isolated from the ΔftlA mutant. Taken together, the presence of the FtlA protein in the lower density gradients, as expected for lipid-containing membrane vesicles, and the reduced lipolytic activity of the purified OMVs clearly demonstrate that the F. holarctica LVS cytoplasmic protein FtlA is translocated extracellularly as a naturally occurring component of OMVs.
The OMV-associated FtlA promotes entry of the ΔftlA mutant into host cells
On the basis of the finding that FtlA is required for adhesion and entry into host cells by F. tularensis LVS (Figure 2), we determined whether the OMV-associated FtlA is able to interact with host cells. First, we determined the localization of FtlA in the OMVs using the protease accessibility method. Western blotting showed that FtlA became undetectable after the OMVs isolated from LVS were treated with proteinase K for 30 min in the absence of detergent (Figure 6). In contrast, the integral outer membrane protein FopA was only sensitive to proteolysis after the OMV integrity was disrupted by the addition of 0.02% SDS, as reported previously.[57] This result strongly suggested that FtlA is exposed at the surface of the OMVs.
Figure 6
Protease accessibility of OMV-associated FtlA. OMVs purified from F. tularensis LVS supernatant were treated with proteinase K in the presence or absence of 0.02% SDS. FtlA and FopA in the samples were probed by Western blotting. The sizes of the proteins are indicated on the right in kDa.
We next evaluated the potential attachment of the OMVs to host cells by confocal microscopy using an antibody specific for FtlA (an indicator of FrancisellaOMVs) and caveolin-1 (a marker of the host cell membrane). The immunofluorescence analysis revealed an intimate association between the FtlA-containing OMVs and RAW264.7 cells (Figure 7A). This type of interaction appeared to be mediated by the cholesterol-containing lipid rafts in the host cell membrane because treatment with 5 mM MβCD before the addition of the FrancisellaOMVs significantly reduced OMV attachment (Figure 7B). MβCD selectively extracts membrane cholesterol.[72]
Figure 7
Attachment of FtlA-containing OMVs to host cells. (A) Detection of the physical association between FtlA-containing OMVs and host cells. RAW264.7 cells grown on coverslips were incubated with OMVs for 1 h (upper panel) or treated with MβCD prior to OMV incubation (lower panel), and processed for immunostaining of caveolin-1 (host cell membrane) or FtlA (OMVs). The upper panel shows the proximity of the OMVs (green fluorescence) to the host cell membrane, as indicated by caveolin-1 staining (red fluorescence); the lower panel shows the significance of membrane cholesterol in OMV attachment. (B) Quantification of the RAW264.7 cell association with Francisella OMVs. RAW264.7 cells positively stained with the FtlA antibody (green in A) are expressed as their percentage among the total cells. A total of 600 cells (200 cells/field) were counted. All values are presented as the mean±sd of triplicate samples. P values were calculated using an unpaired t-test.
Finally, we determined whether OMV-associated FtlA is able to complement the deficiency of the ΔftlA mutant in infecting host cells by assessing the intracellular infectivity of strain ST1705 in the presence of OMVs from the parent strain LVS. An initial test with various concentrations of the LVS OMVs (0–100 μg/mL) revealed that the OMVs in the LVS culture enhanced the entry of RAW264.7 cells by the ΔftlA mutant in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 8A). The level of enhancement reached as high as two-fold. To verify the specific role of FtlA in the OMV-enhanced entry of ST1705, various combinations of bacterial strains and OMV preparations were used to perform the cell invasion experiment. While the OMVs from the culture supernatant of the parent strain LVS significantly enhanced the entry of ST1705 into the host cells, similar preparations from ST1705 failed to complement the deficiency of the ΔftlA mutant (Figure 8B). However, the same OMV preparations from the LVS culture did not show a significant impact on cell internalization of strain LVS or the complemented ΔftlA mutant, suggesting that the effect of FtlA on LVS invasion is saturated by expression of the ftlA gene in these strains. These results strongly suggest that the OMV-associated FtlA plays an important role in promoting the entry of F. tularensis LVS into host cells.
Figure 8
Complementation of the ΔftlA mutant by LVS OMVs and its ability to infect host cells. (A) Dose-dependent impact of LVS OMVs on entry of the ΔftlA mutant into host cells. The monolayers of RAW264.7 cells were co-incubated with the ΔftlA mutant ST1705 and OMV preparation from the parent strain at final concentrations of 0–100 μg/mL for 2 h. Internalized bacteria were enumerated by plating the cell lysates on MHA after the extracellular bacteria were removed by gentamicin treatment. (B) Contribution of FtlA to OMV-enhanced bacterial entry into host cells. Entry of LVS or ST1705 into RAW264.7 cells were tested in the presence or absence of the OMV preparations from LVS or ST1705 (50 μg/mL) as in A. The values represent the CFU levels of intracellular bacteria±sd of triplicate samples. P values were calculated using an unpaired t-test.
DISCUSSION
Bacterial factors that contribute to F. tularensis adhesion to and invasion of host cells are largely unknown.[67] This study has revealed that the FtlA lipase plays an important role in F. tularensis infection of host cells and in vivo fitness based on the following results: (i) genetic deletion of the ftlA gene in the genome of F. tularensis LVS leads to significant impairment in the ability to infect host cells and complete loss of virulence in the pneumoniamouse model; (ii) FtlA possesses a lipolytic activity in both E. coli and F. tularensis; (iii) FtlA can be translocated to the extracellular environment as a component of F. tularensisOMVs; and (iv) the OMV-associated FtlA promotes bacterial adhesion to, and entry into, host cells. These results strongly suggest that FtlA lipase promotes F. tularensis adhesion and internalization by modifying bacterial and/or host molecule(s) when it is secreted as a component of OMVs.The ftlA gene is essential for the virulence of F. tularensis LVS. In agreement with the previous finding obtained for the transposon insertion mutants,[22] the unmarked deletion in the coding sequence of ftlA completely abolished the virulence of the parent strain LVS in the pneumoniamouse model, despite the observation that the mutant had no apparent defect in in vitro growth. This result is in agreement with the significant reduction of bacterial burden in the lungs, livers and spleens, as well as the dramatic decrease in tissue inflammation in the lungs of the mice infected with the ΔftlA mutant. Consistently, the ΔftlA mutant displayed a significant attenuation of adhesion and entry into host epithelial cells and macrophages, but the deficiency of the same mutant was compensated by in trans complementation with the ftlA gene.FtlA is a Francisella lipase. The lipolytic activity of FtlA was initially demonstrated, when it was heterologously expressed as a His-tagged recombinant protein in E. coli. The ftlA-expressing E. coli formed a halo around the colonies on the tributyrin-containing agar plates. The halo structure was no longer detectable when the predicted active site serine residue was mutated to alanine. This result confirmed our initial hypothesis that ftlA encodes a lipase on the basis of its sequence homology to the members of the GDSL serine esterases/lipases. This conclusion is further supported by the lipase activity of strain LVS, which was diminished in its ΔftlA mutant but resurrected with the ftlA complementation plasmid. Finally, the lipase activity was also detected in the OMV preparations of the LVS but not the counterpart of the ΔftlA mutant. We noticed that the lipase activity was more readily detectable in the LVS OMV preparations than the LVS cultures. This phenomenon might be caused by the possibility that the cellular form of the FtlA protein is ‘trapped’ in the cytosol and is not accessible to its substrate(s) unless it is released in the context of the OMVs. While lipolytic activity has been described for the OMVs of Legionella pneumophila,[73] to the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first demonstration that the OMV-associated lipase promotes bacterial infection of host cells.The present data suggest that FtlA is displayed at the surface of OMVs and thereby becomes accessible to an as yet unknown molecule(s) at the interface of the pathogen-host interaction, although it is localized in the cytosol of bacterial cells. In agreement with its lack of a typical signature sequence for secretion or obvious trans-membrane segments, FtlA was not susceptible to proteolysis in the context of intact bacterial cells. However, it was rapidly degraded when the membrane integrity of the F. tularensis cells was compromised by detergent. This finding is in full agreement with the presence of FtlA in the cytoplasmic fraction and inner membrane fractions but not in the outer membrane and periplasmic fractions in the subcellular fractionation experiment. However, our further investigation provided multiple lines of evidence that FtlA is spontaneously released into the extracellular environment as a protein component of OMVs. FtlA was detected, along with the outer membrane protein FopA, in the OMVs extracted from the supernatants of the LVS broth cultures by Western blotting. In contrast, the cytoplasmic protein IglC was undetectable in the OMV preparations, although it was present in the whole cell lysate. There are many examples in which bacterial pathogens use OMVs to selectively secrete virulence factors and thereby facilitate their delivery to host targets.[74] The heat-labile enterotoxin of enterotoxigenic E. coli is found at the surface of OMVs.[46, 47] Similarly, the Lewis antigens on the lipopolysaccharide molecules of Helicobacter pylori are detectable at the surface of OMVs.[75] Thus, we believe that the FtlA detected in our OMV preparations represents a natural component of the FrancisellaOMVs, instead of protein contamination during the OMV purification. Consistently, the major target(s) of FtlA may be the lipid molecules associated with the surface of bacterial and/or host cells, which facilitate Francisella adhesion and entry into host cells. This prediction is consistent with our observation that the FtlA-associated OMVs were detected at the surface of cultured RAW264.7 cells.Our cell culture infection experiments with the ftlA deletion and complementation derivatives of strain LVS strongly suggested that FtlA promoted bacterial adhesion and entry into host cells, with a less important role in the replication of F. tularensis within host cells. The ftlA mutant showed at least a seven-fold reduction of intracellular bacteria during the initial phase of infection (3 h post-inoculation). This result was reproducible in three cell culture models: primary macrophages (BMDM) and two cell lines (A549—epithelial cell and RAW264.7—macrophage). This impairment was rescued with the ftlA-expressing plasmid, thus demonstrating the specific contribution of the ftlA gene to the infectivity of strain LVS. In contrast, relatively lower margins of differences (<5-fold) in intracellular bacteria were observed during a later phase of infection (24 h). This result suggests that FtlA is primarily involved in adhesion and internalization rather than intracellular growth. This conclusion is in concordance with the remarked impairment of the ftlA mutant (>20-fold) in adhesion to host cells (for example, RAW264.7 cells). Our assignment of FtlA as an important bacterial factor for adhesion and internalization is also consistent with our observation that the OMVs of the parent strain LVS restored the internalization of the ftlA mutant in an FtlA-dependent manner since similar OMV preparations from the ftlA mutant had no effect. The lack of OMV-mediated enhancement during co-incubation with LVS or the complemented ftlA mutant might reflect functional saturation of endogenous FtlA in these strains.It is tempting to postulate that the FtlA lipase promotes Francisella infection of host cells by enzymatic modification of a lipid factor(s)/structure(s) exposed at the surface of either the host or the bacterial cells. There are numerous possibilities that FtlA-mediated modification would facilitate Francisella infection of host cells, such as enable the ligand-receptor interaction by modifying either the ligand or the receptor, or by changing the physical properties at the interface between the bacterial and host cells by increasing the leakiness of the host cell/tissue barrier to facilitate bacterial adhesion or entry. The former hypothesis is supported by the increase in bacterial adhesion and entry into host cells by the ftlA mutant in the presence of FtlA-containing OMVs. There is growing evidence that bacterial phospholipase-induced lipid-raft reorganization leads to protein clustering and increased local receptor concentrations, which in turn led to enhanced bacterial adhesion and subsequent internalization.[76] The promotion of Francisella infection by the OMV-associated FtlA lipase is reminiscent of a recent report in which the serine proteases in the OMVs of Campylobacter jejuni, a food-borne pathogen, enhanced bacterial adhesion to and invasion of human colon epithelial cells via the proteolytic cleavage of E-cadherin and occlusion of two major components of tight junctions.[65]Taken together with our previous study,[22] this study provides further evidence supporting FtlA lipase as an important virulence factor of F. tularensis LVS and likely other F. tularensis subspecies due to the high conservation of the ftlA locus in this species. The secretion of FtlA via OMVs represents a novel mechanism of the F. tularensis interaction with host cells during the process of pathogenesis because tube-like OMV were produced in F. novicida during macrophage infection.[57] Further characterization of FtlA, in terms of its target molecule(s), mode of recruitment during OMV biogenesis, and impact in type A strains of F. tularensis, will be highly desirable for a full understanding of F. tularensis virulence and biogenesis of bacterial OMVs.
Authors: Brian C Russo; Joseph Horzempa; Dawn M O'Dee; Deanna M Schmitt; Matthew J Brown; Paul E Carlson; Ramnik J Xavier; Gerard J Nau Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: G Hestvik; E Warns-Petit; L A Smith; N J Fox; H Uhlhorn; M Artois; D Hannant; M R Hutchings; R Mattsson; L Yon; D Gavier-Widen Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Lynne Turnbull; Masanori Toyofuku; Amelia L Hynen; Masaharu Kurosawa; Gabriella Pessi; Nicola K Petty; Sarah R Osvath; Gerardo Cárcamo-Oyarce; Erin S Gloag; Raz Shimoni; Ulrich Omasits; Satoshi Ito; Xinhui Yap; Leigh G Monahan; Rosalia Cavaliere; Christian H Ahrens; Ian G Charles; Nobuhiko Nomura; Leo Eberl; Cynthia B Whitchurch Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lauren C Kinkead; Laura C Whitmore; Jenna M McCracken; Joshua R Fletcher; Brandi B Ketelsen; Justin W Kaufman; Bradley D Jones; David S Weiss; Jason H Barker; Lee-Ann H Allen Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Marije E Kuipers; Cornelis H Hokke; Hermelijn H Smits; Esther N M Nolte-'t Hoen Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 5.640