Gaya Spolverato1, Fabio Bagante1, Luca Aldrighetti2, George Poultsides3, Todd W Bauer4, Ryan C Field5, Hugo P Marques6, Matthew Weiss7, Shishir K Maithel8, Timothy M Pawlik9. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 2. Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. 3. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 5. School of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA. 6. Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal. 7. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA. 8. Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors typically arise from pancreatic (PNET) vs. gastrointestinal or thoracic origins (non-PNET). The impact of primary tumor site on long-term prognosis following resection of neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to define the association of primary tumor location on prognosis of patients undergoing curative intent liver resection for NELM. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2014, 421 patients who underwent resection of NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were stratified and analyzed by location of the primary tumor (PNET vs. non-PNET). A propensity score-matched analysis was utilized to assess the impact of primary tumor location on long-term survival. RESULTS: Among the 421 patients, 197 (46.8%) patients had NELM from a PNET primary while 224 (53.2%) had a non-PNET primary (small bowel, n = 145; rectal, n = 10; bronchial, n = 22; other, n = 47). There were no differences in tumor burden and tumor site, while presence of extrahepatic disease was more common among patients with non-PNET NELM (extrahepatic disease, PNET NELM, n = 11 27.5% vs. non-PNET NELM, n = 29 72.5%; p = 0.010). Patients with PNET NELM were more likely to have non-functional disease compared with patients who had non-PNET NELM (non-functional, PNET NELM, n = 117 54.9% vs. non-PNET NELM, n = 96 45.1%; p = 0.011). On the final pathological specimen of the resected NELM, patients with PNET NELM were more likely to have a moderately differentiated tumor (59.3%), while patients with non-PNET NELM were more likely to have a poorly differentiated tumor (67.8%) (p = 0.005). Patients with PNET NELM had a worse 5-year DFS and 5-year OS compared with patients who had non-PNET NELM (DFS, PNET 36.2% vs. non-PNET 55.2%; p = 0.001 and OS, PNET 79.5% vs. non-PNET 83.4%; p = 0.008). After propensity score matching, both 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of the PNET and non-PNET groups were comparable (DFS, PNET 46.2% vs. non-PNET 55.9%; p = 0.22 and OS, PNET 81.5% vs. non-PNET 84.3%; p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: PNET patients more often present with non-functional NELM and moderately differentiated tumors. On propensity-matched analysis, factors such as extrahepatic disease and tumor grade, but not primary tumor location, were associated with prognosis of patients undergoing curative intent liver surgery for NELM.
BACKGROUND:Neuroendocrine tumors typically arise from pancreatic (PNET) vs. gastrointestinal or thoracic origins (non-PNET). The impact of primary tumor site on long-term prognosis following resection of neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to define the association of primary tumor location on prognosis of patients undergoing curative intent liver resection for NELM. METHODS: Between 1990 and 2014, 421 patients who underwent resection of NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were stratified and analyzed by location of the primary tumor (PNET vs. non-PNET). A propensity score-matched analysis was utilized to assess the impact of primary tumor location on long-term survival. RESULTS: Among the 421 patients, 197 (46.8%) patients had NELM from a PNET primary while 224 (53.2%) had a non-PNET primary (small bowel, n = 145; rectal, n = 10; bronchial, n = 22; other, n = 47). There were no differences in tumor burden and tumor site, while presence of extrahepatic disease was more common among patients with non-PNET NELM (extrahepatic disease, PNET NELM, n = 11 27.5% vs. non-PNET NELM, n = 29 72.5%; p = 0.010). Patients with PNET NELM were more likely to have non-functional disease compared with patients who had non-PNET NELM (non-functional, PNET NELM, n = 117 54.9% vs. non-PNET NELM, n = 96 45.1%; p = 0.011). On the final pathological specimen of the resected NELM, patients with PNET NELM were more likely to have a moderately differentiated tumor (59.3%), while patients with non-PNET NELM were more likely to have a poorly differentiated tumor (67.8%) (p = 0.005). Patients with PNET NELM had a worse 5-year DFS and 5-year OS compared with patients who had non-PNET NELM (DFS, PNET 36.2% vs. non-PNET 55.2%; p = 0.001 and OS, PNET 79.5% vs. non-PNET 83.4%; p = 0.008). After propensity score matching, both 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of the PNET and non-PNET groups were comparable (DFS, PNET 46.2% vs. non-PNET 55.9%; p = 0.22 and OS, PNET 81.5% vs. non-PNET 84.3%; p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: PNET patients more often present with non-functional NELM and moderately differentiated tumors. On propensity-matched analysis, factors such as extrahepatic disease and tumor grade, but not primary tumor location, were associated with prognosis of patients undergoing curative intent liver surgery for NELM.
Entities:
Keywords:
NELM; Neuroendocrine liver metastasis; PNET; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Surgery
Authors: Akshat Saxena; Terence C Chua; Anik Sarkar; Francis Chu; Winston Liauw; Jing Zhao; David L Morris Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Mechteld C de Jong; Carlo Pulitano; Brian M Clary; Srinevas K Reddy; T Clark Gamblin; Scott A Celinksi; David A Kooby; Charles A Staley; Jayme B Stokes; Carrie K Chu; Alessandro Ferrero; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Giles Mentha; Jennifer Strub; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Luca Aldrighetti; Lorenzo Capussotti; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Evan S Glazer; Jennifer F Tseng; Waddah Al-Refaie; Carmen C Solorzano; Ping Liu; Katherine A Willborn; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven A Curley Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Carl R Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: John F Tierney; Jennifer Poirier; Sitaram Chivukula; Sam G Pappas; Martin Hertl; Erik Schadde; Xavier Keutgen Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.257