Literature DB >> 28744581

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation-Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation.

Bruce I Reiner1,2.   

Abstract

One method for addressing existing peer review limitations is the assignment of peer review cases on a completely blinded basis, in which the peer reviewer would create an independent report which can then be cross-referenced with the primary reader report of record. By leveraging existing computerized data mining techniques, one could in theory automate and objectify the process of report data extraction, classification, and analysis, while reducing time and resource requirements intrinsic to manual peer review report analysis. Once inter-report analysis has been performed, resulting inter-report discrepancies can be presented to the radiologist of record for review, along with the option to directly communicate with the peer reviewer through an electronic data reconciliation tool aimed at collaboratively resolving inter-report discrepancies and improving report accuracy. All associated report and reconciled data could in turn be recorded in a referenceable peer review database, which provides opportunity for context and user-specific education and decision support.

Keywords:  Data mining; Peer review; Report analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28744581      PMCID: PMC5788826          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0006-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Data mining applications in healthcare.

Authors:  Hian Chye Koh; Gerald Tan
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: current issues and guidelines.

Authors:  Riccardo Bellazzi; Blaz Zupan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 3.  Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 1: Creation of a Standardized Methodology and Referenceable Database.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Expert witness blinding strategies to mitigate bias in radiology malpractice cases: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Daniel J Durand; Christopher T Robertson; Gautam Agarwal; Richard Duszak; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jason N Itri; Anthony Fotenos; Brent Savoie; Alexander Ding; Jonathan S Lewin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Data mining in radiology.

Authors:  Amit T Kharat; Amarjit Singh; Vilas M Kulkarni; Digish Shah
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2014-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.