Literature DB >> 28744571

What determines the importance of a species for ecosystem processes? Insights from tropical ant assemblages.

Mickal Houadria1,2, Florian Menzel3.   

Abstract

Biodiversity is known to increase ecosystem functioning. However, species vary in their contributions to ecosystem processes. Here, we investigated seven ecosystem functions based on the consumption of different resources in tropical ant communities. We analysed how different species influence site-level resource consumption, and determined how each species influenced performance and stability of these functions. Based on simulated extinctions, we identified 'key species' with significant functional contributions. We then investigated which traits, such as biomass, abundance, and specialisation, characterized them, and compared trait distributions across four sites to analyse differences in functional redundancy. Only few species significantly influenced ecosystem functions. Common generalist species tended to be the most important drivers of many ecosystem functions, though several specialist species also proved to be important in this study. Moreover, species-specific ecological impacts varied across sites. In addition, we found that functional redundancy varied across sites, and was highest in sites where the most common species did not simultaneously have the greatest functional impacts. Furthermore, redundancy was enhanced in sites where species were less specialised and had more even incidence distributions. Our study demonstrates that the ecological importance of a species depends on its functional traits, but also on the community context. It cannot be assessed without investigating its species-specific performance across multiple functions. Hence, to assess functional redundancy in a habitat and the potential for compensation of species loss, researchers need to study species-specific traits that concern functional performance as well as population dynamics and tolerance to environmental conditions.

Keywords:  Ecosystem processes; Formicidae; Functional performance; Functional redundancy; Resource consumption

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744571     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3900-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule.

Authors:  Andrew P Allen; James H Brown; James F Gillooly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality.

Authors:  Andy Hector; Robert Bagchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities.

Authors:  Etienne Laliberté; Jessie A Wells; Fabrice Declerck; Daniel J Metcalfe; Carla P Catterall; Cibele Queiroz; Isabelle Aubin; Stephen P Bonser; Yi Ding; Jennifer M Fraterrigo; Sean McNamara; John W Morgan; Dalia Sánchez Merlos; Peter A Vesk; Margaret M Mayfield
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities.

Authors:  Takehiro Sasaki; William K Lauenroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services.

Authors:  Forest Isbell; Vincent Calcagno; Andy Hector; John Connolly; W Stanley Harpole; Peter B Reich; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Bernhard Schmid; David Tilman; Jasper van Ruijven; Alexandra Weigelt; Brian J Wilsey; Erika S Zavaleta; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The relation between circadian asynchrony, functional redundancy, and trophic performance in tropical ant communities.

Authors:  Mickal Houadria; Nico Blüthgen; Alex Salas-Lopez; Mona-Isabel Schmitt; Johanna Arndt; Eric Schneider; Jérôme Orivel; Florian Menzel
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Experimental evidence that the introduced fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, does not competitively suppress co-occurring ants in a disturbed habitat.

Authors:  Joshua R King; Walter R Tschinkel
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Experimentally testing and assessing the predictive power of species assembly rules for tropical canopy ants.

Authors:  Tom M Fayle; Paul Eggleton; Andrea Manica; Kalsum M Yusah; William A Foster
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparing Sanger sequencing and high-throughput metabarcoding for inferring photobiont diversity in lichens.

Authors:  Fiona Paul; Jürgen Otte; Imke Schmitt; Francesco Dal Grande
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Niche differentiation in rainforest ant communities across three continents.

Authors:  Michael E Grevé; Mickal Houadria; Alan N Andersen; Florian Menzel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.