Literature DB >> 28744077

Cystic lesions of the pancreatico-biliary tree: A schematic MRI approach.

Jaydeep Halankar1, Kartik Jhaveri1, Ur Metser1.   

Abstract

Although a common occurrence, cystic lesions of the pancreatico-biliary tree (PBT) may pose a diagnostic dilemma because they encompass a large number of neoplastic and benign processes with varied clinical symptoms. Knowledge of lesion classification and characterization are essential in making an accurate prospective diagnosis. This is necessary for identifying clinically significant cystic masses, which at times may require invasive intervention from indolent, nonneoplastic lesions, for which surveillance may suffice. Today, there is an arsenal of modalities for assessing the PBT, however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains at the forefront for characterizing cystic morphology and fluid content, internal septations, solid component, enhancement patterns, as well as assessing the surrounding normal structures. This pictorial review aims to review the spectrum of MRI features, which will aid in the differential diagnoses of cystic lesions of the PBT and mimickers, enabling the radiologist to reach a more confident diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystic lesions; MRI; pancreatic-biliary tree

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744077      PMCID: PMC5510314          DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_226_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging        ISSN: 0970-2016


Introduction

Cystic lesions of the PBT occur commonly ranging from simple cysts to malignancies, and may be due to developmental, inflammatory, or neoplastic etiologies. Because there is a tremendous variation in the treatment strategies and therapeutic interventions, being able to differentiate noninvasively the types of cystic tumors is of utmost importance. Identifying a benign entity will help prevent unnecessary surgical intervention while pinpointing a sinister process in a timely manner promotes aggressive lifesaving management. At present, there is an armory of imaging modalities at our disposal for detecting and characterizing cystic lesions of the PBT. Commonly, primary detection is done on ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) scan usually an incidental finding or secondary to vague abdominal symptoms. Well respected modalities, both ultrasound and CT, have undeniable limitations for characterizing cystic tumors of the PBT. Body habitus, size of the lesion, and operator dependency are some of the well-documented boundaries of ultrasound imaging while CT scan has restrictions for actual characterization of the lesion, assessing the fluid content and sometimes even the enhancement pattern. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the leading modality of choice for an accurate assessment of the cystic lesions of the PBT because of its multisequential and multiplanar capabilities and spatial resolution. Morphological features of the cystic lesions on MRI usually correlate with histopathology. MR features that help define the specific entities include signal intensity and internal complexity, such as presence of septations, or enhancing solid components. Furthermore, recently diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has proven to be a beneficial tool for differentiating benign from more sinister lesions.[1] The spectrum of MRI features for the various entities will be reviewed. Throughout the manuscript, the educational imaging “pearls” for each tumour are presented in bold italics.

Biliary Tree Cystic Tumors

Congenital and development

Choledochal cysts

A rare developmental anomaly of the intra and extrahepatic biliary tree (IHBT/EHBT), .[2] Higher in women of Asian descent the clinical presentation is usually in a younger age group (first or second decade of life), and usually following complications such as cholangitis, pancreatitis, or seldom malignancy. Occasionally, they present as an asymptomatic abdominal mass. Although the etiology is unclear, it is widely accepted that choledochal cysts arise from anomalous pancreatico-biliary ductal junctions. Todani classification remains the mainstay of characterizing these cysts: Type I: IA – entire EHBT dilatation, IB – focal/segmental EHBT dilatation, IC – dilatation of the CBD segment only Type II: True diverticulum from EHBD Type III: EHBD dilatation within duodenal wall (choledochocele) Type IV: IVA – cystic involvement of IHBT and EHBT, IVB – EHBT cysts only. MRI can accurately classify cyst types, and calculi (if present) appears as hypointense foci within the T2 bright fluid [Figures 1 and 2].
Figure 1(A-C)

Choledochal cysts type 1 (3 subtypes): Type 1A – dilatation of entire EHDT (A, top row); Type 1B – focal or segmental dilatation of the EHBT (B, middle row); Type 1C – dilatation of the CBD segment only (C, bottom row)

Figure 2(A-D)

Choledochal cysts: Type 2 – true diverticulum from EHBD (A, top row); Type 3 – choledochocele (B, top row); Type 4A – cysts of IHBT and EHDT (C, bottom row) and 4B – only EHBT cysts (D, bottom row)

Choledochal cysts type 1 (3 subtypes): Type 1A – dilatation of entire EHDT (A, top row); Type 1B – focal or segmental dilatation of the EHBT (B, middle row); Type 1C – dilatation of the CBD segment only (C, bottom row) Choledochal cysts: Type 2 – true diverticulum from EHBD (A, top row); Type 3 – choledochocele (B, top row); Type 4A – cysts of IHBT and EHDT (C, bottom row) and 4B – only EHBT cysts (D, bottom row)

Bile duct cysts (hamartomas)

Multiple biliary hamartomas are usually discovered incidentally. These Von Meyenburg complexes arise from embryonic bile ducts that fail to involute, and are usually encountered incidentally at imaging, laparotomy, or autopsy. They are well-circumscribed, <1.5 cm, show a hypointense signal to liver parenchyma on T1 weighted images, and usually show no uptake on gadolinium administration; however, recently a thin rim of enhancement has been described, which may represent the surrounding compressed liver tissue. Typically, they are without evidence of biliary communication [Figure 3A].
Figure 3(A and B)

Bile duct hamartomas: fluid attenuating, T2 hyperintense cyst with thin rim enhancement (A, top row). Caroli's disease: showing T2 bright intrahepatic cysts (arrow) in communication with the biliary tree (B, bottom row)

Bile duct hamartomas: fluid attenuating, T2 hyperintense cyst with thin rim enhancement (A, top row). Caroli's disease: showing T2 bright intrahepatic cysts (arrow) in communication with the biliary tree (B, bottom row)

Caroli disease

Caroli disease (also known as congenital communicating cavernous ectasia of the biliary tree) is classified as a Type V choledochal cyst belonging to the spectrum of fibropolycystic liver disease. This is a developmental defect characterized by saccular dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts, and is often associated with ductal plate abnormalities such as hepatic fibrosis. Clinically, patients present with right upper quadrant pain and rarely jaundice. MRI demonstrates [Figure 3B]. These are typically hypointense on T1-weighted images (T1WI) and markedly hyperintense on T2-weighted images (T2WI). The intraluminal portal vein radicals strongly enhance post gadolinium administration. Bridging across dilated ducts (which resemble internal septae) is also revealed on MRI.

Infectious/Inflammatory

Abscess

Biliary abscesses are usually secondary to acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis. The overall appearance of an abscess varies according to the pathological state of the infection. In an acute stage, on MRI, they appear as a cluster of T2 high intensity lesions with irregular margins and varied enhancement in the internal components as well as the surrounding parenchyma. Clinical suspicion helps support diagnosis. In the more common subacute stage, MRI shows a unilocular T1 hypointense, variable T2 hyperintense lesion (comprising central necrosis and liquefaction) with an enhancing, thick, and [Figure 4A]. The double target sign is attributed to increased capillary permeability and in the surrounding liver tissue, and this perilesional edema is used to differentiate a hepatic abscess from an indolent cystic lesion.
Figure 4(A and B)

Peribiliary abscess: “double target sign” (A, top row). Bilioma: extrahepatic cystic mass with thick T2 dark enhancing pseudocapsule (B, bottom row)

Peribiliary abscess: “double target sign” (A, top row). Bilioma: extrahepatic cystic mass with thick T2 dark enhancing pseudocapsule (B, bottom row)

Bilioma

Biliomas are encapsulated bile collections secondary to rupture and trauma including iatrogenic trauma. They can be intrahepatic or perihepatic and clinical presentation depends on the size and location. Bile extravasation leads to an intense reaction resulting in a T2 hypointense pseudocapsule [Figure 4B]. . Typically, MRI shows a well-defined T2 hyperintense cystic mass with or without irregular border, calcification, or septations (depending on the chronicity).

Cystic Neoplasms

Benign

Biliary cystadenoma

Biliary cystadenomas (BCA) are rare (<5%), slow growing, multilocular cystic tumors,[3] which are generally intrahepatic, however, extrahepatic variants have been reported. They are seen to occur predominantly in middle-aged women and are considered premalignant. Clinically, patients often present with intermittent pain or symptoms of biliary obstruction. The internal fluid can be clear, proteinaceous, mucinous, and occasionally, gelatinous, purulent, or hemorrhagic.[3] The MR features typically show a [Figure 5]. Variable signal intensities depend on internal hemorrhage, protein content, and seldom solid component.
Figure 5

Biliary cystadenoma: Multiloculated cystic lesion showing minimal enhancement of the thin septations/internal locule. No solid components

Biliary cystadenoma: Multiloculated cystic lesion showing minimal enhancement of the thin septations/internal locule. No solid components

Gall bladder adenomyomatosis

Also termed adenomatous hyperplasia of the gall bladder, it is a benign hyperplastic cholecystosis. Even though it is usually an incidental diagnosis made in patients in their 50s, age range is wide. This requires no surgical intervention and has a definitive appearance not to be confused with a gall bladder malignancy. It frequently coexists with cholelithiasis and rarely produces abdominal pain. MRI readily shows wall thickening, and the Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses present as intramural lesions, which are hypointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI without enhancement on gadolinium administration. The “” sign, which alludes to the characteristically curvilinear arrangement of multiple rounded hyperintense intraluminal cavities on T2WI [Figure 6A], are typical for hyperplastic cholesterosis. Intraluminal calculi appear as signal voids, and abnormal enhancement patterns, if seen, should raise the suspicion of a more sinister process at work and warrants a more aggressive approach.
Figure 6(A and B)

Adenomyomatosis: “String of pearl” on T2WI (A, top row); Lymphangioma: T2 bright structure engulfing the gallbladder without mass effect (B, bottom row)

Adenomyomatosis: “String of pearl” on T2WI (A, top row); Lymphangioma: T2 bright structure engulfing the gallbladder without mass effect (B, bottom row)

Lymphangioma

These are benign lesions that show lymphatic differentiation and are of vascular origin. Occurring more commonly in women, the most common presentation is of dull intermittent right upper quadrant pain. Typical MR appearance is that of a cystic process engulfing the gallbladder without mass effect and minimal inhomogeneous enhancement at times [Figure 6B]. . Occasionally, the lymphangioma may compress the gall bladder lumen, however, no communication with the biliary tree is identified.

Malignant

Biliary cystadenocarcinoma

This malignant counterpart of BCA is also a rare, usually slow growing intrahepatic neoplasm arising from hepatobiliary epithelium. Typically seen in middle-aged women who present with abdominal discomfort. MRI and MRCP, because of increased contrast and spatial resolution, are more specific imaging modality in the detection of these neoplasms. MRI demonstrates a [Figure 7].[4] It remains pertinent to differentiate from a cystadenoma (the benign variant) because, although these are slow growing, they warrant aggressive surgical intervention.
Figure 7

Biliary cystadenocarcinoma: Multilocular cystic mass with enhancing solid component which suppresses on ADC

Biliary cystadenocarcinoma: Multilocular cystic mass with enhancing solid component which suppresses on ADC

Mucin hypersecreting carcinoma of the biliary tree

Also known as intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the bile ducts, these account for approximately 7% of biliary neoplasms.[5] These present clinically as acute cholangitis attributed to intermittent obstruction of the biliary tree. They share a striking similarity to intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas in its histopathological features, production of a large amount of mucin, pathophysiologic characteristics, and resultant clinical manifestations. secondary to hypersecretion of mucous [Figure 8A]. Depending on tumor size, occasionally an enhancing small flat or fungating mass may be identified within the ducts, however, not necessarily identified.
Figure 8(A and B)

Mucin hypersecreting carcinoma: Mucin filled dilatation of the biliary tree with an enhancing nodule (A, top row). Cystic adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder: complex gall bladder mass with enhancing mural nodules (B, bottom row).

Mucin hypersecreting carcinoma: Mucin filled dilatation of the biliary tree with an enhancing nodule (A, top row). Cystic adenocarcinoma of the gall bladder: complex gall bladder mass with enhancing mural nodules (B, bottom row).

Cystic adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder

While biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma of the liver are more common entities, BCA of the gall bladder is an extremely rare lesion often making diagnosis challenging and problematic. The origin of these lesions from the gallbladder can be confirmed by either an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) to demonstrate communication with the cystic duct or an angiography to demonstrate the blood supply from a cystic artery; however, MRI is a safe noninvasive modality to illustrate these rare malignancies. MRI imaging shows a complex T1 hypointense, T2 hyperintense , which are specific for this malignancy [Figure 8B]. Differentiation from lymphangioma and hydatid cyst is warranted but relatively simple on MRI.

Pancreatic Cystic Tumors

Simple cysts (including mucinous nonneoplastic cysts)

These cysts show mucinous differentiation of the epithelial lining, but lack surrounding ovarian stroma that is characteristic of mucinous cystadenomas. They also have no ductal communication, cellular atypia or internal septae or solid component, and have no malignant potential; hence, reassuring to be followed or even ignored after long-term assessment. Their benign histology correlates excellent on MRI. Typically, these are simple T1 dark, T2 bright unilocular small lesions with thin walls, no internal enhancement or solid components, and interval stability on long term surveillance [Figure 9A].
Figure 9(A-C)

Simple cysts: incidental T2 bright non-enhancing cyst (A, top row). Pseudocyst: well-circumscribed complex cyst with no significant peripancreatic inflammation (B, middle row). Abscess: irregular thick walled cyst with significant peripancreatic inflammation (C, bottom row)

Simple cysts: incidental T2 bright non-enhancing cyst (A, top row). Pseudocyst: well-circumscribed complex cyst with no significant peripancreatic inflammation (B, middle row). Abscess: irregular thick walled cyst with significant peripancreatic inflammation (C, bottom row)

Pseudocyst

Overall, pseudocysts are the most common cystic pancreatic lesions. Usually, occurring as a sequel of pancreatitis, secondary to hemorrhagic fat necrosis and encapsulation of pancreatic secretions by granulation tissue and a fibrous capsule. The MRI appearance of pseudocysts may evolve over time; they are often irregularly marginated early in their formation but become well circumscribed, with a thickened enhancing wall, over a period of several weeks. MRI may be the imaging modality of choice for associated pancreatic parenchymal disease. MR shows a (blood products, necrotic debris), , and at times [Figure 9B]. A late complication (>4–6 weeks) of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Blood products and necrotic or proteinaceous debris are commonly present, and on MRI produce intrinsically increased T1 signal intensity. The thickened and enhancing cyst wall seen on images correspond to granulation tissue and fibrosis that is confirmed on histologic analysis. with variable signal on MR, secondary to pus, tissue necrosis, and debris [Figure 9C]. Intervention of larger abscesses and psudocysts (>6 cm) is often implemented because there is a concern for superimposed infection increasing morbidity for an already susceptible patient.

Hydatid cyst

A worldwide zoonosis hydatid cyst is produced by the larval stage of the Echinococcus tapeworm (E. granulosus and E. multilocularis). Hydatid disease should be considered when a cystic lesion is identified in a patient who lives in or has come from an area in which the disease is endemic, especially if typical imaging characteristics are seen. Commonly seen in the liver and rarely in the pancreas, appearance of hydatid cyst varies depending on the stage of cyst growth (i.e., whether the cyst is unilocular, contains daughter vesicles, contains daughter cysts, is partially calcified, or is completely calcified [dead]). MRI still remains the more relatable modality for an accurate diagnosis, however, counterpart imaging modalities such ultrasound and CT scan are also very useful. MR usually shows with low T2 signal fibrous wall (pericyst), incipient membrane detachment (wall irregularities), and daughter cysts [Figure 10]. Internal complexities vary signal changes on the T1WI and gadolinium administration may or may not show enhancement pattern (stage dependent).
Figure 10

Hydatid cyst: multivesicular cysts with membrane detachment

Hydatid cyst: multivesicular cysts with membrane detachment

Serous neoplasms

Also referred to as microcystic cystadenoma, these are commonly found in women over 60 years of age; it is usually an incidental finding however nonspecific complaints of weight loss or even vague abdominal pain have been noted. These tumors are composed of multiple cysts with sizes varying from 0.2 to 2.0 cm. A central stellate scar with calcification has been observed and is known to be pathognomic to this tumor (seen as a signal void on MRI). There are three morphological patterns, namely, polycystic, honeycomb, and oligocystic. On MRI, .[6] The honeycomb has well-marginated subcentimeter (micro) cysts with mixed signal intensity and a sharp interface with vessels. The uncommon oligocystic/macrocystic variant is usually seen in the pancreatic head and demonstrates multicystic lobulated morphology with fewer large (>2 cm) cysts [Figure 11A–C]. Asymptomatic serous cystadenomas do not require surgical excision because they are rarely malignant. Tumors smaller than 2 cm have been reported, and are more likely to be serous cystadenomas, although this is not always the norm.
Figure 11(A-C)

Benign serous neoplasm: Polycystic: multiple (<2 cm) cysts with enhancing central scar (A, top row). Honeycomb: subcentimeter microcysts. No scar (B, middle row). Oligocystic: fewer large cysts ranging from 2 to 5 cm (C, bottom row)

Benign serous neoplasm: Polycystic: multiple (<2 cm) cysts with enhancing central scar (A, top row). Honeycomb: subcentimeter microcysts. No scar (B, middle row). Oligocystic: fewer large cysts ranging from 2 to 5 cm (C, bottom row)

Mucinous cystadenoma

The most common cystic tumors of the pancreas these neoplasms contain large cysts with mucin secreting columnar cells and peripheral calcification (unlike the central calcification seen is serous tumors). These are benign or borderline (dysplastic) mucin-producing tumours (variable T1, high T2 signal), with delayed rim enhancement on MRI, and no ; usually found in pancreatic body/tail [Figure 12]. There is a spectrum of mucinous cystic neoplasms from benign to malignant, however, the confident exclusion of malignancy is rarely possible on the basis of imaging findings alone. Mucinous cystic tumors should always be resected because they are all potentially malignant.
Figure 12

Mucinous cystadenoma: Benign multiloculated variable T1 and T2 signal without enhancing components, thick septations, or ductal communication

Mucinous cystadenoma: Benign multiloculated variable T1 and T2 signal without enhancing components, thick septations, or ductal communication

Pancreatic cysts in Von Hippel Lindau disease

Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) is a rare autosomal dominant multisystem disorder with multiple abdominal manifestations, including renal and pancreatic cystic and a variety of benign and malignant neoplasms. Pancreatic involvement in VHL disease includes simple pancreatic cysts, serous microcystic adenomas, and rarely, adenocarcinomas. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors can also occur. Combined lesions occur, however, neuroendocrine tumors and cystic lesions only rarely exist together. When symptoms are present, they usually consist of minor abdominal discomfort. Rarely, severe pancreatic cystic disease results in exocrine insufficiency requiring enzyme replacement. Commonly, there is replacement of the pancreas by multiple, T1 dark, T2 bright lobulated cysts (“) [Figure 13A].[7] There is no enhancement identified and typically it may be difficult to identify the normal underlying pancreatic parenchyma. It should be noted that pancreatic cysts are extremely rare in the general population; therefore, the presence of even a single cyst in an individual undergoing VHL disease screening because of a family history makes it highly likely that the person has VHL disease.
Figure 13(A and B)

Von Hippel Lindau disease: “Bunch of Grapes” pattern showing innumerable T2 bright cysts (A, top row). Lymphangioma: signal drop on out-of-phase chemical shift imaging (B, bottom row)

Von Hippel Lindau disease: “Bunch of Grapes” pattern showing innumerable T2 bright cysts (A, top row). Lymphangioma: signal drop on out-of-phase chemical shift imaging (B, bottom row) Lymphangiomas of the abdomen are commonly mesenteric or retroperitoneal. Pancreatic lymphangiomas are extremely rare and warrant differentiation form neoplastic cystic masses of the pancreas. Patients have often presented with epigastric pain and sometimes a palpable mass is felt on clinical examination. [Figure 13B]. A T2 hypointense rim may be seen occasionally, and if large enough, the lymphangioma can be seen compressing adjacent structure in an indolent manner.

Plexiform neurofibroma

Plexiform neurofibroma (PNF) are rare nonepithelial neoplasms similar to neurofibromas found elsewhere in the body, rare mimickers of pancreatic cysts on MR, and are considered a mosaic located form of neurofibromatosis-1. Symptoms are generally related to regional mass effect. Intratumoral edematous and myxoid changes create the [Figure 14A]. Surgical resection is necessary to exclude malignancy which is more frequently encountered in PNF compared with classical neurofibromas, however, it is still to be considered a benign pancreatic tumor (as malignancy is rare).
Figure 14(A and B)

Plexiform Neurofibroma: complex T2 bright “trilobar” appearance (A, top row). Solitary Fibrous Tumors: T1/T2 dark mildly enhancing wall with a central cystic component (B, bottom row)

Plexiform Neurofibroma: complex T2 bright “trilobar” appearance (A, top row). Solitary Fibrous Tumors: T1/T2 dark mildly enhancing wall with a central cystic component (B, bottom row)

Solitary fibrous tumor

A solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a submesothelial neoplasm that usually arises from the pleura, but also found at other sites such as the lung, mediastinum, pericardium, mesothelium, peritoneum, extraperitoneal space, nose, and paranasal sinus. A pancreatic SFT is exceedingly rare. MRI is more definitive in characterizing these tumors compared to ultrasound and CT scan given its excellent spatial resolution. These are generally asymptomatic and found incidentally with no sex predilection. SFT is similar in morphology to non-functioning islet cell tumour. On MR imaging SFT may contain a [Figure 14B]. It is difficult to differentiate an SFT from a nonfunctioning islet cell tumor or solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) of the pancreas. SPT, however, appears more multifaceted with internal complexities and irregular margin.

Primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

Solid ductal adenocarcinoma, the most common lethal neoplasm occasionally shows cystic features (cystic degeneration, retention cysts, and attached pseudocysts). Furthermore, primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) with cystic features are sometimes similar to some other cystic pancreatic lesions, including pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCN), mucinous cystadenoma (MCN), pseudocyst, and so on. On MR, cystic degeneration is seen within/adjacent to the primary malignancy [Figure 15]. . It is hence important to differentiate these entities as indolent cystic masses need no aggressive management versus a ductal malignancy requires urgent attention.
Figure 15

Adenocarcinoma with cystic degeneration: an aggressive neoplasm with central cystic component

Adenocarcinoma with cystic degeneration: an aggressive neoplasm with central cystic component

Solid pseudopapillary tumors

A solid pesudopapillary tumor (SPT) (also known as papillary and cystic tumors, or solid-cystic tumors) is histologically distinct neoplasms having a low malignant neoplasm, common in young women of Asian or African–American descent. The tumor tends to be a large, well-circumscribed, and slowly growing mass. MR shows a complex heterogeneous solid-cystic mass with gradual enhancement of the solid component, less than adjacent pancreatic parenchyma [Figure 16].
Figure 16

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT): solid-cystic enhancing mass with capsule

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPT): solid-cystic enhancing mass with capsule

Cystic neuroendocrine tumor

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the pancreas are uncommon, most being sporadic, however, there is association with familial syndromes such as MEN1, VHL, and NF1. Cystic pancreatic NET is uncommon and is often considered a component of a larger tumor with cystic degeneration. Thus, they are generally larger than their solid counterparts and usually located within the pancreas or gastrinoma triangle. CT and ultrasound would be limited in evaluating these tumors. MRI imaging shows a T2 hyperintense mass with or without solid component which shows an [Figure 17].[8] Most nonfunctioning masses are malignant.
Figure 17

Cystic neuroendocrine tumor: cystic lesion with strong hyper enhancing peripheral rim

Cystic neuroendocrine tumor: cystic lesion with strong hyper enhancing peripheral rim

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are uncommon ductal epithelial tumors. Common in middle-aged men, these may be main duct, branch duct, or mixed type. Branch duct lesions are generally benign whereas main duct tumours are associated with malignancy.[8] Typical location (uncinate process), typical appearance (grapelike locules), and communication with the duct usually separate it from other lesions in the pancreas. A markedly dilated uncinate branch filled with mucus is a typical feature of a side branch IPMN. Complex features include a thick, enhancing wall/septae and nodules. The main duct variant can have either segmental or diffuse ductal involvement. [Figure 18].[9] Differentiating feature of segmental main duct IPMN from a mucinous cyst is the presence of MPD dilatation.
Figure 18

Cystic mass with enhancing papillary excrescences/nodules and ductal dilatation

Cystic mass with enhancing papillary excrescences/nodules and ductal dilatation

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma

The malignant counterpart of the benign cystadenoma is a mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (MCAC) which shows invasive carcinomatous elements within a mucinous cyst with a surrounding ovarian-type stroma. The patients are of an older age group suggesting malignant transformation of an MCA. MR imaging features show a appearance with . Restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging may also aid in confirming the diagnosis [Figure 19]. Mucinous cystic tumors should always be resected because they are all potentially malignant.
Figure 19

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma: a multiloculated complex cystic mass containing thick septations and enhancing solid components

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma: a multiloculated complex cystic mass containing thick septations and enhancing solid components

Cystic metastases

Cystic pancreatic metastases are unusual, but from primary tumours including lung, breast, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. MR appearance is of a complex (cystic T1 dark, T2 bright) mass with mural enhancement and/or solid nodules [Figure 20].[10]
Figure 20

Cystic metastases: Complex T2 bright signal with wall/solid component enhancement and relevant history

Cystic metastases: Complex T2 bright signal with wall/solid component enhancement and relevant history

Exceedingly rare cystic lesions

These range from infectious lesions such as tuberculosis to aggressive malignancies such as embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Although unlikely to be encountered clinically, these should be considered in the differentials diagnosis of cystic pancreatic masses in the appropriate clinical context.

Conclusion

Characterization of cystic lesions of the PBT has always been a challenge for the radiologist and may be a diagnostic quandary. In the last decade or so due to refined and improved imaging techniques, especially high-resolution MRI, there has been significant advancement in the characterization and accurate diagnoses of PBT cystic masses. In most cases, a correct presumptive diagnosis can be made on the basis of MRI criteria alone. Specific MRI findings that are important to recognize are the size of the lesion; the presence and thickness of a wall; the presence of septa, calcifications, or internal nodules; the enhancement pattern and the signal intensity spectrum. In addition, access to critical clinical information remains useful. MR features described in this pictorial review may aid radiologists in narrowing the diffentials and distinguishing indolent masses from more aggressive lesions requiring timely intervention.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: part 1, Biliary tract.

Authors:  Jinxing Yu; Mary Ann Turner; Ann S Fulcher; Robert A Halvorsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid and cystic lesions of the pancreas.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Frank H Miller; Zongming E Chen; Laura Merrick; Koenraad J Mortele; Frederick L Hoff; Nancy A Hammond; Vahid Yaghmai; Yaghmai Vahid; Paul Nikolaidis
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings in pancreatic and other abdominal manifestations of Von Hippel-Lindau disease in a series of 23 patients: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Rossella Graziani; Simona Mautone; Mario Vigo; Riccardo Manfredi; Giuseppe Opocher; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2014-01-10

4.  MRI of islet cell tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Steven Herwick; Frank H Miller; Ana L Keppke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: can benign lesions be differentiated from malignant lesions with multidetector CT?

Authors:  Satomi Kawamoto; Karen M Horton; Leo P Lawler; Ralph H Hruban; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult: differential CT and MR imaging features.

Authors:  K J Mortelé; P R Ros
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the biliary tract: a real disease?

Authors:  Joshua G Barton; David A Barrett; Marco A Maricevich; Thomas Schnelldorfer; Christina M Wood; Thomas C Smyrk; Todd H Baron; Michael G Sarr; John H Donohue; Michael B Farnell; Michael L Kendrick; David M Nagorney; Kaye M Reid Lombardo; Florencia G Que
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma: CT and sonographic findings.

Authors:  M Korobkin; D H Stephens; J K Lee; R J Stanley; E K Fishman; I R Francis; M B Alpern; M Rynties
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  CT features of renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on relation to tumor size.

Authors:  R J Zagoria; N T Wolfman; N Karstaedt; G C Hinn; R B Dyer; Y M Chen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Typical and atypical manifestations of serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: imaging findings with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jae Young Lee; Joon Seok Lim; Jae Joon Chung; Ki Whang Kim; Hyung Sik Yoo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.