| Literature DB >> 28743965 |
Jan Škarohlíd1, Petr Ashcheulov2, Radek Škoda1, Andrew Taylor2, Radim Čtvrtlík3, Jan Tomáštík3, František Fendrych2, Jaromír Kopeček2, Vladimír Cháb2, Stanislav Cichoň2, Petr Sajdl4, Jan Macák4, Peng Xu5, Jonna M Partezana6, Jan Lorinčík7, Jana Prehradná1, Martin Steinbrück8, Irena Kratochvílová9.
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate and describe an effective method of protectingEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28743965 PMCID: PMC5526891 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06923-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Weight gains (mg/dm2) measured after autoclave tests of uncoated ZIRLO samples (tubes and plates) and samples coated with 300 or 500 nm of NCD.
| Sample type | NCD layer thickness (nm) | Weight gain (mg/dm2) of autoclaved samples | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 days | 15 days | 30 days | 90 days | 120 days | 150 days | 170 days | 195 days | ||
| Tube | 300 | 9.4 | 15.5 | 19.6 | 33.3 | 31 | 30 | 41 | — |
| Tube | 500 | 7.7 | 13.6 | 19.1 | 31.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Plate | 300 | 5.4 | 9.3 | 14.1 | 27.1 | 29 | 38 | 40 | 52 |
| Plate | 500 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 9.4 | 20.6 | — | — | — | — |
| Tube | 0 | 15.1 | 20.6 | 26.2 | 40.3 | 52 | 66 | 68 | — |
| Plate | 0 | 13.0 | 18.1 | 23.7 | 37.3 | 52 | 65 | 70 | 79 |
The samples were processed in 360 °C hot water for 6, 15, 30, 90, 120, 150, 170, and 195 days under primary circuit conditions in a PWR in accordance with ASTM standard procedures[21]. The greater relative weight gain of the uncoated ZIRLO plates and tubes indicated stronger oxidation of the unprotected surfaces.
Figure 1(a) weight gains (mg/dm−2) measured after 6, 15, 30, 90, 120, 150, 170 and 195 days of exposure to hot water (360 °C) for uncoated and 300 nm NCD-coated ZIRLO plate samples. (b) weight gains (mg/dm−2) measured after 6, 15, 20, 30, 40 and 90 days of exposure to hot water (360 °C) for uncoated, 300 nm NCD-coated, 500 nm NCD-coated and 700 nm NCD-coated ZIRLO plate samples. Thicker NCD layers provide ZIRLO plates with stronger protection against oxidation than thinner layers do.
Figure 2Optical microscopy images of the metallographic cross sections. (a) a 300 nm NCD-coated ZIRLO tube sample processed at 1000 °C in hot steam. (1) Outer-surface zirconium dioxide layer, with a thickness of 90.8 μm. (2) Outer-surface oxygen-stabilized zirconium α phase (solid Zr-O solution). (3) Initial Zr β phase (metastable modified hexagonal close-packed structure). (4) Inner-surface oxygen-stabilized Zr α phase. (5) Inner-surface ZrO2 layer, with a thickness of 125.02 μm. (b) an uncoated ZIRLO tube sample subjected to hot steam (1000 °C/1 h). On the outer surface of the tube, the ZrO2 thickness was 195.13 μm; on the inner surface, the ZrO2 thickness was 196.8 μm.
Figure 3C1s lines of ZIRLO coated with NCD after calibration on the basis of the Zr 3d5/2 line. The areas analyzed were on the NCD surface and at the NCD/ZrO2 interface after hot steam exposure (400 °C, 4 days). Four different states of carbon are evident (a): graphite, with a binding energy of 285.4 eV; diamond, with a binding energy of 284.2 eV; carbon in a single bond with oxygen, with a binding energy of 286.1 eV; and carbide, with a binding energy of 282 eV. Carbides were also present below the NCD layer (b).
Figure 4Measured 488 nm Raman spectra of 300 nm thick NCD layers on ZIRLO tubes, as deposited and after 6, 15 and 30 days of exposure to hot water at 360 °C. The 1332 cm−1 peak is typical of diamond. The broad band visible at 1400–1550 cm−1 is a signature of amorphous carbon located within the grain boundaries, the band at ~1580 cm−1 was assigned to graphite, and the ~1620 cm−1 peak was attributed to the presence of “graphite-like” disordered carbon.
Figure 5Secondary electron micrographs of NCD layer. (a) Thickness of 300 nm before 30 days of exposure to 360 °C hot water. (b) Thickness of 300 nm after 30 days of exposure to 360 °C hot water. (c) Thickness of 500 nm after 15 days of exposure to 360 °C hot water. No important change in the NCD layer thickness was detected, thus confirming the high durability of the layer.
Figure 6Secondary electron micrographs of the initial surface of a Zr alloy sample covered with 300 nm thick NCD (left) and the surface after 30 days of exposure to 360 °C hot water (right). No microstructural changes were observed in the hot-water-processed NCD film.
Figure 7SIMS data showing that after 4 days of hot steam exposure at 400 °C, the ZrO2 layer in 300 nm NCD-coated ZIRLO contained C to a depth bigger than 1.5 µm (a), whereas in non-exposed NCD-coated ZIRLO, the majority of the carbon was contained only within the thin (0.4 µm) NCD layer (b). The depth profiles of C and O are in units of counts/s and labelled in the graphs.
Figure 8Mott-Schottky plots for NCD-coated and uncoated ZIRLO alloy samples after 4 days in 400 °C steam. The dashed lines denote the linear slope regions used to calculate the densities of defects (additional donors/acceptors). Both the zirconium oxide and the NCD layer clearly exhibited semiconductive behavior.
Acceptor and donor densities obtained from the Mott-Schottky plots for uncoated ZIRLO before and after hot steam exposure and for NCD-coated ZIRLO samples after hot steam exposure.
| Sample | NA [cm−3] | ND [cm−3] |
|---|---|---|
| ZIRLO | — | 4 × 1020 |
| ZIRLO, 4 days at 400 °C | — | 2.3 × 1018 |
| ZIRLO with 300 nm NCD, 4 days at 400 °C | 4.4 × 1016 | 2–3 × 1016 |
The uncoated ZIRLO exhibited n-type semiconductive behavior, whereas the NCD-protected ZIRLO after hot steam exposure exhibited mixed p- and n-type semiconductive behavior.