Literature DB >> 2874336

Death as an option in neonatal intensive care.

A Whitelaw.   

Abstract

Many paediatricians believe that there are circumstances in which infants should be allowed to die without having their lives prolonged by intensive care or surgery. During a four-year period, in a regional neonatal intensive-care unit, 75 infants were so seriously ill that withdrawal of treatment was discussed. 26 infants had severe acquired neurological damage, 26 had been born after extremely short gestation (25 weeks or less), and 23 had severe congenital abnormalities. The decision to withdraw treatment from a particular infant had to be unanimous among all the medical and nursing staff caring for that child and was based on a virtual certainty, not just of handicap, but of total incapacity--eg, microcephaly, spastic quadriplegia, and blindness. Of the 75 infants, the decision of the medical team was to withdraw treatment from 51. The parents of 47 infants accepted the decision and all these infants died. The parents of 4 infants chose continued intensive care, and 2 infants survived with disabilities. In the other 24 cases, the medical decision was to continue treatment. Of these, 17 survived and 7 died. When a thorough medical assessment had led to unanimous agreement among staff and parents that treatment should be withdrawn, its continuation on purely legal grounds is not justifiable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Hammersmith Hospital (London); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2874336     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  10 in total

Review 1.  Intervention after birth asphyxia.

Authors:  A Whitelaw
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: changing patterns of end of life care over two decades.

Authors:  D J Wilkinson; J J Fitzsimons; P A Dargaville; N T Campbell; P M Loughnan; P N McDougall; J F Mills
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Blindness in schoolchildren: importance of heredity, congenital cataract, and prematurity.

Authors:  C I Phillips; A M Levy; M Newton; N L Stokoe
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  '....officiously to keep alive'.

Authors:  C H Walker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Decision making and modes of death in a tertiary neonatal unit.

Authors:  R Roy; N Aladangady; K Costeloe; V Larcher
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. II. Medical logistics and the potential for good response.

Authors:  J M Davies; B M Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. I. Background to decision making.

Authors:  J M Davies; B M Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  A life worth giving? The threshold for permissible withdrawal of life support from disabled newborn infants.

Authors:  Dominic James Wilkinson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  The outcome of treatment limitation discussions in newborns with brain injury.

Authors:  Marcus Brecht; Dominic J C Wilkinson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.747

10.  In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Robert Truog; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.898

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.