Literature DB >> 28743024

A Method to Evaluate the Quality of Clinical Gene-Panel Sequencing Data for Single-Nucleotide Variant Detection.

Chung Lee1, Joon S Bae2, Gyu H Ryu3, Nayoung K D Kim2, Donghyun Park2, Jongsuk Chung4, Sungkyu Kyung5, Je-Gun Joung2, Hyun-Tae Shin2, Seung-Ho Shin2, Younglan Kim2, Byung S Kim2, Hojun Lee2, Kyoung-Mee Kim6, Jung-Sun Kim6, Woong-Yang Park7, Dae-Soon Son8.   

Abstract

Customized gene-panel tests, based on next-generation sequencing, have demonstrated their usefulness in a plethora of clinical settings. As with other clinical diagnostic techniques, gene-panel sequencing for clinical purposes requires precise quality control (QC) measures to ensure its reliability. Only detected variants are currently recorded in clinical reports; however, identifying whether a nondetected variant is a true or false negative is regarded essential in a clinical setting and, thus, a comprehensive QC measure is in demand. Conventional QC metrics, such as mean coverage and uniformity, are considered inadequate for such an evaluation. As such, a more specific measure focused on clinically important variants is herein proposed. In this study, we suggest a new scoring method for assessing the quality of clinical gene-panel sequencing data, specifically for the detection of a set of single-nucleotide variants. The performance of the method was analyzed using 2295 clinical samples (1012 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and 1283 fresh-frozen tissues), and was shown to provide additional information that conventional methods do not show, such as mean depth and uniformity. Customized sequencing protocols, which include QC criteria, have been optimized by each genomic laboratory. The pass rate scoring method proposed in this study provides an appropriate QC response variable for the customized panel, which strengthens the reliability of calls on clinically relevant variants implicated in clinical reports.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28743024     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  9 in total

1.  Clinical Relevance of Genomic Changes in Recurrent Pediatric Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Boram Lee; Ji Won Lee; Joon Ho Shim; Je-Gun Joung; Jae Won Yun; Joon Seol Bae; Hyun-Tae Shin; Ki Woong Sung; Woong-Yang Park
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.243

2.  Rapid and highly-specific generation of targeted DNA sequencing libraries enabled by linking capture probes with universal primers.

Authors:  Joel Pel; Amy Leung; Wendy W Y Choi; Milenko Despotovic; W Lloyd Ung; Gosuke Shibahara; Laura Gelinas; Andre Marziali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Implementing TMB measurement in clinical practice: considerations on assay requirements.

Authors:  Reinhard Büttner; John W Longshore; Fernando López-Ríos; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Nicola Normanno; Etienne Rouleau; Frédérique Penault-Llorca
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-01-24

4.  Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study.

Authors:  Dohee Kwon; Binnari Kim; Hyeong Chan Shin; Eun Ji Kim; Sang Yun Ha; Kee-Taek Jang; Seung Tae Kim; Jeeyun Lee; Won Ki Kang; Joon Oh Park; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  [Expert Consensus on Tumor Mutational Burden for Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer].

Authors: 
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-20

6.  seGMM: A New Tool for Gender Determination From Massively Parallel Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Sihan Liu; Yuanyuan Zeng; Chao Wang; Qian Zhang; Meilin Chen; Xiaolu Wang; Lanchen Wang; Yu Lu; Hui Guo; Fengxiao Bu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Four distinct immune microenvironment subtypes in gastric adenocarcinoma with special reference to microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Junhun Cho; Young Hwan Chang; You Jeong Heo; Seungtae Kim; Nayoung Kd Kim; Joon Oh Park; Won Ki Kang; Jeeyun Lee; Kyoung-Mee Kim
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-03-15

8.  Landscape of Actionable Genetic Alterations Profiled from 1,071 Tumor Samples in Korean Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Lee; Boram Lee; Joon Ho Shim; Kwang Woo Lee; Jae Won Yun; Sook-Young Kim; Tae-You Kim; Yeul Hong Kim; Young Hyeh Ko; Hyun Cheol Chung; Chang Sik Yu; Jeeyun Lee; Sun Young Rha; Tae Won Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Seock-Ah Im; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Sukki Cho; Jin Hyoung Kang; Jihun Kim; Sang Kyum Kim; Han Suk Ryu; Sang Yun Ha; Jong Il Kim; Yeun-Jun Chung; Cheolmin Kim; Hyung-Lae Kim; Woong-Yang Park; Dong-Young Noh; Keunchil Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Tumor mutational burden standardization initiatives: Recommendations for consistent tumor mutational burden assessment in clinical samples to guide immunotherapy treatment decisions.

Authors:  Albrecht Stenzinger; Jeffrey D Allen; Jörg Maas; Mark D Stewart; Diana M Merino; Madison M Wempe; Manfred Dietel
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.006

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.