Literature DB >> 28742012

The usefulness and costs of routine contrast studies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for detecting staple line leaks.

Dimitry Terterov1, Philemon Ho-Yan Leung1, Laurie K Twells1, Deborah M Gregory1, Chris Smith1, Darrell Boone1, David Pace1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 35), staple line leaks remain a major complication and account for a substantial portion of the procedure's morbidity and mortality. Many centres performing LSG routinely obtain contrast studies on postoperative day 1 for early detection of staple line leaks. We examined the usefulness of Gastrografin swallow as an early detection test for staple line leaks on postoperative day 1 after LSG as well as the associated costs.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database that included 200 patients who underwent LSG for severe obesity between 2011 and 2014. Primary outcome measures were the incidence of staple line leaks and the results of Gastrografin swallow tests. We obtained imaging costs from appropriate hospital departments.
RESULTS: Gastrografin swallow was obtained on postoperative day 1 for all 200 patients who underwent LSG. Three patients (1.5%) were found to have staple line leaks. Gastrograffin swallows yielded 1 true positive result and 2 false negatives. The false negatives were subsequently diagnosed on computed tomography (CT) scan. The sensitivity of Gastrografin swallow in this study was 33%. For 200 patients, the total direct cost of the Gastrografin swallows was $35 000.
CONCLUSION: The use of routine upper gastrointestinal contrast studies for early detection of staple line leaks has low sensitivity and is costly. We recommend selective use of CT instead.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28742012      PMCID: PMC5608583          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  34 in total

1.  Conservative management of anastomotic leaks.

Authors:  Attila Csendes
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Complications associated with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a surgeon's guide.

Authors:  Kourosh Sarkhosh; Daniel W Birch; Arya Sharma; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Comment on: Accuracy of routine postoperative swallow study in predicting leak or obstruction after gastric bypass.

Authors:  John N Afthinos; Karen E Gibbs
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Early results of a Canadian laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy experience.

Authors:  Carola Behrens; Bao Q Tang; Bradley J Amson
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Value of performing routine postoperative liquid contrast swallow studies following robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Monika E Hagen; Gilles Chassot; Pascale Koutny-Fong; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients.

Authors:  Nasser Sakran; David Goitein; Asnat Raziel; Andrei Keidar; Nahum Beglaibter; Ronit Grinbaum; Ibrahim Matter; Ricardo Alfici; Ahmad Mahajna; Igor Waksman; Mordechai Shimonov; Ahmad Assalia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Selective approach to use of upper gastroesophageal imaging study after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Stephen White; Soo Hwa Han; Catherine Lewis; Kevin Patel; Brad McEvoy; Barbara Kadell; Amir Mehran; Erik Dutson
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Asok Doraiswamy; Jason J Rasmussen; Jonathan Pierce; William Fuller; Mohamed R Ali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Safety and efficacy of 1020 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed as a primary treatment modality for morbid obesity. A single-center experience from the metabolic and bariatric surgical accreditation quality and improvement program.

Authors:  Emanuela Silva Alvarenga; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Samuel Szomstein; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The Newfoundland and Labrador Bariatric Surgery Cohort Study: Rational and Study Protocol.

Authors:  Laurie K Twells; Deborah M Gregory; William K Midodzi; Carla Dillon; Christopher S Kovacs; Don MacDonald; Kendra K Lester; David Pace; Chris Smith; Darrell Boone; Raleen Murphy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficacy of Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Series (UGI) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-analysis on 7516 Patients.

Authors:  Mario Musella; Valeria Cantoni; Roberta Green; Wanda Acampa; Nunzio Velotti; Paola Maietta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Upper gastrointestinal series after sleeve gastrectomy is unnecessary to evaluate for gastric sleeve stenosis.

Authors:  Sean Bhalla; Jessica X Yu; Oliver A Varban; Allison R Schulman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Traumatic esophageal perforation in Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital: A case-series.

Authors:  Jan C Vázquez-Rodríguez; Natalia M Pelet Del Toro; Omar García-Rodríguez; Ediel Ramos-Meléndez; Julio López-Maldonado; Felipe Rodríguez; Jorge Pelet Mejías; Pablo Rodríguez-Ortiz
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-28

4.  Differences in examination results of small anastomotic fistula after radical gastrectomy with afterward treatments: A case report.

Authors:  Chen-Yang Lu; Ya-Li Liu; Kui-Jie Liu; Shu Xu; Hong-Liang Yao; Lun Li; Zhu-Shu Guo
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Is routine post-sleeve gastrografin needed? Profile of 98 cases.

Authors:  Bandar Saad Assakran; Abdullah Homood Alromaih; Abdulrahman Haitham Alashkar; Fatimah Salem AlGhasham; Mansur Suliman Alqunai
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.