Literature DB >> 28741823

Recovery of ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water fluxes from thinning and stand-replacing fire.

Sabina Dore1, Mario Montes-Helu1, Stephen C Hart2, Bruce A Hungate3,4, George W Koch3,4, John B Moon1, Alex J Finkral1, Thomas E Kolb1,3.   

Abstract

Carbon uptake by forests is a major sink in the global carbon cycle, helping buffer the rising concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, yet the potential for future carbon uptake by forests is uncertain. Climate warming and drought can reduce forest carbon uptake by reducing photosynthesis, increasing respiration, and by increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires, leading to large releases of stored carbon. Five years of eddy covariance measurements in a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)-dominated ecosystem in northern Arizona showed that an intense wildfire that converted forest into sparse grassland shifted site carbon balance from sink to source for at least 15 years after burning. In contrast, recovery of carbon sink strength after thinning, a management practice used to reduce the likelihood of intense wildfires, was rapid. Comparisons between an undisturbed-control site and an experimentally thinned site showed that thinning reduced carbon sink strength only for the first two posttreatment years. In the third and fourth posttreatment years, annual carbon sink strength of the thinned site was higher than the undisturbed site because thinning reduced aridity and drought limitation to carbon uptake. As a result, annual maximum gross primary production occurred when temperature was 3 °C higher at the thinned site compared with the undisturbed site. The severe fire consistently reduced annual evapotranspiration (range of 12-30%), whereas effects of thinning were smaller and transient, and could not be detected in the fourth year after thinning. Our results show large and persistent effects of intense fire and minor and short-lived effects of thinning on southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystem carbon and water exchanges.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990NEEzzm321990; zzm321990Pinus ponderosazzm321990; carbon; disturbance; eddy covariance; fire; thinning

Year:  2012        PMID: 28741823     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02775.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Post-wildfire effects on carbon and water vapour dynamics in a Spanish black pine forest.

Authors:  T Dadi; E Rubio; E Martínez-García; F R López-Serrano; M Andrés-Abellán; F A García-Morote; J De las Heras
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Effects of climate variability and accelerated forest thinning on watershed-scale runoff in southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests.

Authors:  Marcos D Robles; Robert M Marshall; Frances O'Donnell; Edward B Smith; Jeanmarie A Haney; David F Gori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-05-22

4.  A century of changing flows: Forest management changed flow magnitudes and warming advanced the timing of flow in a southwestern US river.

Authors:  Marcos D Robles; Dale S Turner; Jeanmarie A Haney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Natural climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Fargione; Steven Bassett; Timothy Boucher; Scott D Bridgham; Richard T Conant; Susan C Cook-Patton; Peter W Ellis; Alessandra Falcucci; James W Fourqurean; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Huan Gu; Benjamin Henderson; Matthew D Hurteau; Kevin D Kroeger; Timm Kroeger; Tyler J Lark; Sara M Leavitt; Guy Lomax; Robert I McDonald; J Patrick Megonigal; Daniela A Miteva; Curtis J Richardson; Jonathan Sanderman; David Shoch; Seth A Spawn; Joseph W Veldman; Christopher A Williams; Peter B Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Marci Baranski; Patricia Elias; Richard A Houghton; Emily Landis; Emily McGlynn; William H Schlesinger; Juha V Siikamaki; Ariana E Sutton-Grier; Bronson W Griscom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Dramatic increase in water use efficiency with cumulative forest disturbance at the large forested watershed scale.

Authors:  Krysta Giles-Hansen; Xiaohua Wei; Yiping Hou
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Management Impacts on Carbon Dynamics in a Sierra Nevada Mixed Conifer Forest.

Authors:  Sabina Dore; Danny L Fry; Brandon M Collins; Rodrigo Vargas; Robert A York; Scott L Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.