Literature DB >> 28741654

The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria.

Sally K Abell1,2, Helena J Teede1,2.   

Abstract

Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADIPS; IADPSG criteria; gestational diabetes; pregnancy outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28741654     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  7 in total

1.  A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Data Linkage Publications on Diabetes in Australia.

Authors:  Ngan T T Dinh; Ingrid A Cox; Barbara de Graaff; Julie A Campbell; Brian Stokes; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenrui Ye; Cong Luo; Jing Huang; Chenglong Li; Zhixiong Liu; Fangkun Liu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Implications of the introduction of new criteria for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes: a health outcome and cost of care analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Cade; Alexander Polyakov; Shaun P Brennecke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  The Unrealised Potential for Predicting Pregnancy Complications in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shamil D Cooray; Lihini A Wijeyaratne; Georgia Soldatos; John Allotey; Jacqueline A Boyle; Helena J Teede
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Cost Effectiveness of Antenatal Lifestyle Interventions for Preventing Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disease in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Cate Bailey; Helen Skouteris; Cheryce L Harrison; Jacqueline Boyle; Rebeccah Bartlett; Briony Hill; Shakila Thangaratinam; Helena Teede; Zanfina Ademi
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-09

6.  Early Pregnancy Screening for Women at High-Risk of GDM Results in Reduced Neonatal Morbidity and Similar Maternal Outcomes to Routine Screening.

Authors:  Erin Clarke; Thomas J Cade; Shaun Brennecke
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2020-01-29

7.  Prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes: a protocol for systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shamil D Cooray; Jacqueline A Boyle; Georgia Soldatos; Lihini A Wijeyaratne; Helena J Teede
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.