Literature DB >> 2874076

The accuracy of hysterosalpingography versus laparoscopy in evaluation of infertile women.

B Ismajovich, S Wexler, A Golan, L Langer, M P David.   

Abstract

Two hundred fifteen infertile women underwent hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy. One hundred twenty-eight patients had bilaterally patent tubes on hysterosalpingography. Thirty-one percent of these women had pelvic adhesions diagnosed by laparoscopy. Eighty-seven women had either occluded tubes or suspected pelvic adhesions on hysterosalpingography. Thirty-nine percent of these women had patent tubes without any pelvic pathology on laparoscopy. Inaccurate diagnoses limit the value of hysterosalpingography in evaluation of tubal and peritubal pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2874076     DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(86)90016-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  1 in total

1.  [Diagnosis of tubal patency: hysterosalpingography, diagnostic pelviscopy and scanning electron microscopy of the fimbria epithelium].

Authors:  G Keckstein; S Hepp; A Wolf
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.