Literature DB >> 28740667

Discordance of physician clinical judgment vs. pneumonia severity index (PSI) score to admit patients with low risk community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective multicenter study.

Pedro J Marcos1, Marcos I Restrepo2, Francisco J González-Barcala3, Nilam J Soni2, Iria Vidal1, Pilar Sanjuàn4, Diego Llinares5, Lucía Ferreira-Gonzalez6, Carlos Rábade3, Isabel Otero-González1, Pedro Marcos7, Héctor Verea-Hernando1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between clinical judgment and the pneumonia severity index (PSI) score in deciding the site of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been well investigated. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical factors that influence decision-making to hospitalize low-risk patients (PSI ≤2) with CAP.
METHODS: An observational, prospective, multicenter study of consecutive CAP patients was performed at five hospitals in Spain. Patients admitted with CAP and a PSI ≤2 were identified. Admitting physicians completed a patient-specific survey to identify the clinical factors influencing the decision to admit a patient. The reason for admission was categorized into 1 of 6 categories. We also assessed whether the reason for admission was associated with poorer clinical outcomes [intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day mortality or readmission].
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five hospitalized patients were enrolled. Two or more reasons for admission were seen in 94 patients (60.6%), including abnormal clinical test results (60%), signs of clinical deterioration (43.2%), comorbid conditions (28.4%), psychosocial factors (28.4%), suspected H1N1 pneumonia (20.6%), and recent visit to the emergency department (ED) in the past 2 weeks (7.7%). Signs of clinical deterioration and abnormal clinical test results were associated with poorer clinical outcomes (P<0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk patients with CAP and a PSI ≤2 are admitted to the hospital for multiple reasons. Abnormal clinical test results and signs of clinical deterioration are two specific reasons for admission that are associated with poorer clinical outcomes in low risk CAP patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); hospitalization; pneumonia severity index (PSI)

Year:  2017        PMID: 28740667      PMCID: PMC5506170          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  38 in total

1.  Predictive accuracy of the pneumonia severity index vs CRB-65 for time to clinical stability: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) International Cohort Study.

Authors:  Forest W Arnold; Guy N Brock; Paula Peyrani; Eduardo L Rodríguez; Alejandro A Díaz; Paolo Rossi; Julio A Ramirez
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.415

2.  Economic benefit of a 1-day reduction in hospital stay for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Authors:  C M Kozma; M Dickson; M K Raut; S Mody; A C Fisher; J R Schein; J I Mackowiak
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 3.  Can we use severity assessment tools to increase outpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia?

Authors:  James D Chalmers; Julia Rutherford
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version.

Authors:  M Woodhead; F Blasi; S Ewig; J Garau; G Huchon; M Ieven; A Ortqvist; T Schaberg; A Torres; G van der Heijden; R Read; T J M Verheij
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Routine use of the Pneumonia Severity Index for guiding the site-of-treatment decision of patients with pneumonia in the emergency department: a multicenter, prospective, observational, controlled cohort study.

Authors:  Bertrand Renaud; Eva Coma; Jose Labarere; Jan Hayon; Pierre-Marie Roy; Hélène Boureaux; Fabienne Moritz; Jean François Cibien; Thomas Guérin; Emmanuel Carré; Armelle Lafontaine; Marie Pierre Bertrand; Aline Santin; Christian Brun-Buisson; Michael J Fine; Eric Roupie
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Physician judgement is a crucial adjunct to pneumonia severity scores in low-risk patients.

Authors:  G Choudhury; J D Chalmers; P Mandal; A R Akram; M P Murray; P Short; A Singanayagam; A T Hill
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 7.  Severity assessment scores to guide empirical use of antibiotics in community acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Aran Singanayagam; James D Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 30.700

8.  Reasons why emergency department providers do not rely on the pneumonia severity index to determine the initial site of treatment for patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; Julie B McCausland; Jeff Whittle; D Scott Obrosky; Donald M Yealy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Duration of length of stay in pneumonia: influence of clinical factors and hospital type.

Authors:  R Menéndez; M J Cremades; E Martínez-Moragón; J J Soler; S Reyes; M Perpiñá
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Community-acquired pneumonia team decreases length of stay in hospitalized, low-risk patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  Pedro J Marcos; Marcos I Restrepo; Pilar Sanjuàn; Lucía Ferreira-Gonzalez; Héctor Verea-Hernando
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.