| Literature DB >> 28740566 |
Norifumi Kennoki1, Toru Saguchi2, Jun Otaka2, Yosuke Makuuchi3, Takafumi Watanabe4, So Katayanagi3, Hiromi Serizawa5, Kiyoshi Koizumi1, Koichi Tokuuye2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a recent study, it was reported that transcatheter arterial embolization with spherical embolic material for life-threatening hemorrhages in various cancer patients was safe and effective. Calibrated microspheres are able to access distal regions of the target arteries, which results in the disappearance of tumor staining. However, there are few reports on the pathological behavior of EmboSpheres in gastric cancer specimens. In this case, we succeeded in salvage embolization for advanced gastric cancer with hemorrhagic shock using spherical embolic material. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pathological evaluation of spherical embolic microspheres in a gastric cancer specimen. CASE REPORT: A 70-year-old man with scirrhous gastric cancer was admitted to our hospital for staging laparoscopy. Unfortunately, he had a sudden onset of hematemesis and melena leading to hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding from the gastric cancer. While undergoing a rapid blood transfusion, he underwent emergent embolization to achieve hemostasis. The left gastric and right gastroepiploic arteries were embolized with spherical embolic material, and the patient survived. Two days later, the patient was able to undergo gastrectomy. A large number of microspheres were observed in areas of hemorrhage. The range and median diameter of the minor axis were 177-1048 μm and 281 μm, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Catheterization, Peripheral; Embolization, Therapeutic; Hemostasis; Microspheres; Stomach Neoplasms
Year: 2017 PMID: 28740566 PMCID: PMC5507799 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.901602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Figure 1Initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. Thickening of the entire circumference of the gastric body wall (arrows) was displayed. A swollen lymph node was displayed in the lesser curvature (arrowhead).
Figure 2Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images of the celiac artery and left gastric artery. (A) Selective celiac artery angiography. The left hepatic artery (black arrow) and left subphrenic artery (white arrow) branched from the left gastric artery. (B) Selective left gastric artery angiography. (C) The pseudoaneurysm was located on a branch from the left gastric artery (arrowhead). (D) After the embolization using gelatin sponge and EmboSpheres the target branch was occluded completely.
Figure 3DSA images of the right gastroepiploic artery. (A) Although extravasation and pseudoaneurysm were not displayed, the tumor staining was seen along the gastric wall in the greater curvature. (B) After embolization using EmboSpheres only, final angiography showed disappearance of tumor staining and the remaining main trunk of the right gastroepiploic artery (arrow).
Figure 4Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. (A) Two days after embolization neither the gastric body wall nor the swollen lymph node in the lesser curvature were enhanced (arrowheads). On the other hand, the gastric body wall in the greater curvature remained enhanced (arrows). An area of the gastric wall mucosa membrane in the lesser curvature was collapsed (yellow arrows). (B) A low-density area was located in segment 4 of the liver, indicating infarction (circle).
Figure 5Gastric cancer specimen. (A) The area of the ulcer that adhered to and remained on the patient’s pancreas (asterisk), areas of hemorrhage (surrounded by solid lines) and a thick gastric wall (region surrounded by the dotted line) were macroscopically observed. (B) Cross-section after sectioning showed thick and white regions, which indicated cancer cell infiltration. (C) The spread of cancer cells is indicated with white lines. (D) The number of EmboSpheres detected in each region of the specimen.
Figure 6Pathological findings on hematoxylin and eosin staining. (A) The lesion due to the ulcer near the mucosa formed a slope. (B) High-power field of the area within the square in (A). Hemorrhage, venous stasis and necrotic cancer cells were observed in the submucosal layer. (C) The posterior wall in the greater curvature – numerous and dense cancer cells were observed in the submucosa and between the muscles. (D) The anterior wall in the greater curvature - few cancer cells were observed compared with the posterior wall.
Figure 7Pathological images showing embolic agents embolizing all arteries in the submucosa of the gastric wall. (A) An EmboSpehre. (B) 6 EmboSpheres. (C) 19 EmboSpheres. (D) 42 EmboSpheres. (E) EmboSpheres (arrows) and gelatin sponge (arrow head) embolizing one artery. (F) EmboSpheres (arrow), embolization and hemorrhage (asterisk).
Diameters of vessels embolized with embospheres.
| Vessel number | Minor axis (μm) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 441 |
| 2 | 259 |
| 3 | 264 |
| 4 | 206 |
| 5 | 177 |
| 6 | 382 |
| 7 | 240 |
| 8 | 1.048 |
| 9 | 298 |
| 10 | 196 |
| 11 | 1.007 |
| 12 | 893 |
| Range | 177–1.048 |
| Median | 281 |
| Mean | 451 |
Outcomes of transarterial embolization.
| Target artery | Feeding area | DSA imaging | Embolic agent | CECT imaging | Adverse events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branch of the left gastric artery | Gastric wall and lymph nodes in the lesser curvature | Pseudoaneurysm | Gelatin sponge | No enhancement of the gastric wall and lymph nodes | None |
| Common trunk of the left gastric and left hepatic artery | Tumor stain | EmboSphere | Infarction of segment 4 of the liver | ||
| Right gastroepiploic artery | Gastric wall in the greater curvature | Tumor stain | EmboSphere | Enhancement of gastric wall remaining | None |