Literature DB >> 28740266

Reproducibility of Centric Relation Techniques by means of Condyle Position Analysis.

Nikolina Holen Galeković1, Vesna Fugošić2, Vedrana Braut2, Robert Ćelić3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility of clinical centric relation (CR) registration techniques (bimanual manipulation, chin point guidance and Roth's method) by means of condyle position analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty two fully dentate asymptomatic subjects (16 female and 16 male) with normal occlusal relations (Angle class I) participated in the study (mean age, 22.6 ± 4.7 years). The mandibular position indicator (MPI) was used to analyze the three-dimensional (anteroposterior (ΔX), superoinferior (ΔZ), mediolateral (ΔY)) condylar shift generated by the difference between the centric relation position (CR) and the maximal intercuspation position (MI) observed in dental arches.
RESULTS: The mean value and standard deviation of three-dimensional condylar shift of the tested clinical CR techniques was 0.19 ± 0.34 mm. Significant differences within the tested clinical CR registration techniques were found for anteroposterior condylar shift on the right side posterior (Δ Xrp; P ≤ 0.012); and superoinferior condylar shift on the left side inferior (Δ Zli; P ≤ 0.011), whereas between the tested CR registration techniques were found for anteroposterior shift on the right side posterior (ΔXrp, P ≤ 0.037) and superoinferior shift on the right side inferior (ΔZri, P ≤ 0.004), on the left side inferior (ΔZli, P ≤ 0.005) and on the left side superior (ΔZls, P ≤ 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Bimanual manipulation, chin point guidance and Roth's method are clinical CR registration techniques of equal accuracy and reproducibility in asymptomatic subjects with normal occlusal relationship.

Keywords:  Bimanual Manipulation; Centric Relation; Chin Point Guidance; Dental Occlusion; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Position Indicator; Roth's Method

Year:  2017        PMID: 28740266      PMCID: PMC5506257          DOI: 10.15644/asc51/1/2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat        ISSN: 0001-7019


  33 in total

Review 1.  An appraisal of the literature on centric relation. Part III.

Authors:  A Keshvad; R B Winstanley
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.

Authors:  Alireza Keshvad; Raymond B Winstanley
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Recording the retruded contact position: a review of clinical techniques.

Authors:  P H R Wilson; A Banerjee
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Maxillomandibular relationship philosophies for prosthodontic treatment: a survey of dental educators.

Authors:  Philip S Baker; M Harry Parker; John R Ivanhoe; F Michael Gardner
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 5.  Centric relation: A historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective.

Authors:  Donald J Rinchuse; Sanjivan Kandasamy
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Influence of the Hinge Axis Transfer Modality on the Three-Dimensional Condylar Shift Between the Centric Relation and the Maximum Intercuspation Positions.

Authors:  Nikolina Holen Galeković; Vesna Fugošić; Vedrana Braut; Robert Ćelić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-03

7.  Location of the terminal hinge axis by intraoral means.

Authors:  J H Long
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Functional occlusion for the orthodontist.

Authors:  R H Roth
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1981-01

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.

Authors:  Frank E Cordray
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Guided and unguided mandibular reference positions in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  A Celar; J Freudenthaler; A Crismani; A Graf
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  5 in total

1.  A clinical comparative study to assess the efficacy of a new centric registration technique with a conventional technique.

Authors:  R Sushma; Malvika Suresh Roy; Pronob Kumar Sanyal; Anand Joshi; Aaditee Vande; Abhijeet Ramachandra Kore
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

2.  The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.

Authors:  Ilona Radej; Izabela Szarmach
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Do the Mandibular Condyles Change Their Positions within Glenoid Fossae after Occlusal Splint Therapy Combined with Physiotherapy in Patients Diagnosed with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders? A Prospective Case Control Study.

Authors:  Marcin Derwich; Elzbieta Pawlowska
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Comparison of Techniques for Obtaining Centric Relation Based on the Reproducibility of the Condylar Positions in Centric Relation-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz; André Luiz de Melo Moreno; Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  Reproducibility of the Obtained Centric Relation Records in Patients with Disc Displacement with Reduction.

Authors:  Samir Čimić; Sonja Kraljević Šimunković; Ana Savić Mlakar; Sunčana Simonić Kocijan; Petra Tariba; Amir Ćatić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2018-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.