| Literature DB >> 28740230 |
Fay Probert1,2, Victor Ruiz-Rodado1, Danielle Te Vruchte2, Elena-Raluca Nicoli2, Tim D W Claridge3, Christopher A Wassif2,4, Nicole Farhat4, Forbes D Porter4, Frances M Platt2, Martin Grootveld5.
Abstract
Niemann-Pick type C1 (NPC1) disease is a rare autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder, which presents with a range of clinical phenotypes and hence diagnosis remains a challenge. In view of these difficulties, the search for a novel, NPC1-specific biomarker (or set of biomarkers) is a topic of much interest. Here we employed high-resolution 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy coupled with advanced multivariate analysis techniques in order to explore and seek differences between blood plasma samples acquired from NPC1 (untreated and miglustat treated), heterozygote, and healthy control subjects. Using this approach, we were able to identify NPC1 disease with 91% accuracy confirming that there are significant differences in the NMR plasma metabolic profiles of NPC1 patients when compared to healthy controls. The discrimination between NPC1 (both miglustat treated and untreated) and healthy controls was dominated by lipoprotein triacylglycerol 1H NMR resonances and isoleucine. Heterozygote plasma samples displayed also increases in the intensities of selected lipoprotein triacylglycerol 1H NMR signals over those of healthy controls. The metabolites identified could represent useful biomarkers in the future and provide valuable insight in to the underlying pathology of NPC1 disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28740230 PMCID: PMC5524790 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06264-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical characteristics of NPC1 patients and healthy control subjects included in this cohort.
| NPC1 untreated | NPC1 MGS treated | Heterozygous parents | Healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (male/female/unknown) | 75 (42/33) | 89 (54/35) | 31 (15/13/3) | 30 (23/6/2) |
| Average age in years (range) | 19 (0.3–54) | 11 (1–28) | N/A | 15 (0.4–50) |
| ASIS range | 0.13–5.97 | 0.07–9.16 | N/A | N/A |
Figure 1Representative 1H CPMG NMR spectrum of (a) untreated NPC1 patient plasma with 27 major metabolites labelled; (1) mobile lipid -CH3, (2) isoleucine, (3) leucine, (4) valine, (5) 2,3 butanediol, (6) 3-hydroxybutyrate, (47) mobile lipid -(CH2)n-, (8) lactate, (9) alanine, (10) mobile lipid –CH CH2CO, (11) arginine, (12) acetate, (13) proline/mobile lipid CH2-CH -CH=, (14) N-acetyl glycoprotein/mobile lipid CH2-CH -CH=, (15) glutamate, (16) glutamine, (17) acetoacetate, (18) citrate,(19) Ca2+-EDTA, (20) Mg2+-EDTA, (21) EDTA, (22) Zn2+-EDTA, (22) α-glucose, (23) mobile unsaturated lipids >CH=CH<, (24) tyrosine, (25) histidine, (26) phenylalanine, (27) formate, and (H) contaminants arising from histopaque cell separation. (b) 1H NMR spectrum of histopaque column flow through; matching contaminants are clearly visible in the plasma spectrum.
Figure 2Principal component analysis scores plots (component 1 vs. component 2) of comparisons made on (a) HC vs. NPC1, (b) HC vs. HET, (c) HC vs. MGS, (d) NPC1 vs. HET, (e) NPC1 vs. MGS, and (f) and MGS vs. HET.
Random forest classification performances of training and test sets. Mean (EEM).
| Out-of-bag error | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC v. NPC1 | 0.089 (0.002) | 0.910 (0.004) | 0.923 (0.005) | 0.887 (0.012) |
| HC v. HET | 0.175 (0.005) | 0.818 (0.007) | 0.824 (0.011) | 0.823 (0.012) |
| HC v. MGS | 0.160 (0.003) | 0.832 (0.006) | 0.864 (0.007) | 0.729 (0.015) |
| NPC1 v. HET | 0.205 (0.003) | 0.789 (0.005) | 0.808 (0.007) | 0.747 (0.018) |
| NPC1 v. MGS | 0.353 (0.004) | 0.646 (0.006) | 0.664 (0.008) | 0.632 (0.010) |
Significant random forest discriminatory variables.
| Metabolite | Bin (ppm) | NPC1 | HET | MGS | NPC1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| -CH3 (HDL) | [0.81 .. 0.83] |
| |||
| -CH3 (VLDL) | [0.83 .. 0.89] |
|
|
| |
| -(CH2-)n (HDL) | [1.21 .. 1.23] |
|
| ||
| -(CH2-)n (LDL) | [1.23 .. 1.25] |
|
|
| |
| -(CH2-)n (VLDL) | [1.25 .. 1.31] |
|
|
|
|
| -C | [1.53 .. 1.61] |
|
|
|
|
| CH2-C | [1.96 .. 2.05] |
| |||
| Unsaturated lipid >CH=CH< (bin 1) | [5.26 .. 5.32] |
|
|
| |
| Unsaturated lipid >CH=CH< (bin 2) | [5.32 .. 5.37] |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Isoleucine | [0.913 .. 0.936] |
|
| ||
| Proline/CH2-C | [1.94 .. 1.965] |
| |||
| Proline/CH2-C | [1.95 .. 1.96] |
| |||
| Histidine (bin 1) | [7.02 .. 7.08] |
| |||
| Histidine (bin 2) | [7.74 .. 7.85] |
| |||
|
| |||||
| Ca2+-EDTA | [2.52 .. 2.58] |
|
| ||
|
| |||||
| 2,3-butanediol | [1.13 .. 1.15] |
| |||
Arrows indicate an increase/decrease in the measured metabolite with respect to the HC samples or with respect to the HET samples in the case of the NPC1 v. HET comparison. The results of the Tukey’s HSD test for each metabolite identified by the random forests analysis are indicated by an asterisks (Bonferroni corrected p-values < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 are represented by *, **, and *** respectively). The order in which the discriminatory variables were ranked by random forest analysis based on their MDA value is represented in brackets (1 = discriminatory variable with highest MDA).
Figure 3Lipid region (0.8–2.1 ppm) of average 1H NMR spectra of NPC1 (red), MGS (blue), HET (green), and HC (black) plasma. Box plots illustrate the full range, interquartile range and median of the spectral integral of each region given (Bonferroni-corrected p-values < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 are represented by *, ** and *** respectively).
Figure 4Canonical correlation analysis (CCorA) plot revealing associations between the PC scores vectors arising from (1) total lipoprotein triacylglycerol-CH3 function-normalised 1H NMR triacylglycerol resonances (PCs 1–4), and (2) total triacylglycerol concentration-normalised clinical chemistry-determined total, LDL- and HDL-associated cholesterol concentrations (PCs 1* and 2*). Information regarding the predictor variables loading on each set of PCs is provided in section 2.6. Y1 and Y2 represent scores vector datasets arising from the separate 1H NMR and clinical chemistry datasets respectively.