Literature DB >> 28739761

The Prognostic Value of the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System in HER2-Enriched Subtype Breast Cancer, a Retrospective Analysis.

Bin Zhou1, Ling Xu1, Jingming Ye1, Ling Xin1,2, Xuening Duan1, Yinhua Liu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) released its 8th edition of tumor staging which is to be implemented in early 2018. The present study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of AJCC 8th edition Cancer Staging System in HER2-enriched breast cancer, on a retrospective cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-center study of HER2-enriched breast cancer cases diagnosed from January 2008 to December 2014. Clinicopathological features and follow up data including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to explore prognostic factors for disease outcome. We restaged patients based on the 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging system and analyzed prognostic value of the Anatomic Stage Group and the Prognostic Stage Group.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 170 HER2-enriched subtype breast cancer patients with 5-year disease free survival (DFS) of 85.1% and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 86.8%. Prognostic stages of 117 cases (68.8%) changed compared with anatomic stages, with 116 upstaged cases and 1 downstaged case. The Anatomic Stage Groups had a significant prognostic impact on DFS (χ2=16.752, p<0.001) and OS (χ2=25.038, p<0.001). The Prognostic Staging Groups had a significant prognostic impact on DFS (χ2=6.577, p=0.037) and OS (χ2=21.762, p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, both stage groups were independent predictors of OS.
CONCLUSION: Both Anatomic and Prognostic Stage Groups in the 8th edition of the AJCC breast cancer staging system had prognostic value in HER2-enriched subtype breast cancer. The Prognostic Stage system was a breakthrough on the basis of anatomic staging system. Copyright
© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AJCC cancer staging system; Breast cancer; HER2-enriched subtype; prognostic value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739761     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  13 in total

1.  Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Authors:  Esther C Yoon; Christopher Schwartz; Edi Brogi; Katia Ventura; Hannah Wen; Farbod Darvishian
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Apelin is associated with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Zhaolei Cui; Wei Peng; Xiaojiang Wang; Yapeng Chen; Xiufeng Wu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Validation of the revised 8th AJCC breast cancer clinical prognostic staging system: analysis of 5321 cases from a single institution.

Authors:  Rana Aldrees; Xiaoqing Gao; Kui Zhang; Gene P Siegal; Shi Wei
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Comparison of Pathological Prognostic Stage and Anatomic Stage Groups According to the Updated Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Breast Cancer Staging 8th Edition.

Authors:  Kamuran Ibis; Selnur Ozkurt; Seden Kucucuk; Ekrem Yavuz; Pınar Saip
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-31

5.  The Effect of the New Eighth Edition Breast Cancer Staging System on 100 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Ashley Biswal; Jacqueline Erler; Omar Qari; Arthur A Topilow; Varsha Gupta; Mohammad A Hossain; Arif Asif; Brian Erler; Denise Johnson Miller
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-05-10

6.  Validation of the AJCC prognostic stage for HER2-positive breast cancer in the ShortHER trial.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Dieci; Giancarlo Bisagni; Alba A Brandes; Antonio Frassoldati; Luigi Cavanna; Francesco Giotta; Michele Aieta; Vittorio Gebbia; Antonino Musolino; Ornella Garrone; Michela Donadio; Anita Rimanti; Alessandra Beano; Claudio Zamagni; Hector Soto Parra; Federico Piacentini; Saverio Danese; Antonella Ferro; Katia Cagossi; Samanta Sarti; Anna Rita Gambaro; Sante Romito; Viviana Bazan; Laura Amaducci; Gabriella Moretti; Maria Pia Foschini; Sara Balduzzi; Roberto Vicini; Roberto D'Amico; Gaia Griguolo; Valentina Guarneri; Pier Franco Conte
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sae Byul Lee; Guiyun Sohn; Jisun Kim; Il Yong Chung; Jong Won Lee; Hee Jeong Kim; Beom Seok Ko; Byung Ho Son; Sei-Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Prognostic Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System in 24,014 Korean Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Isaac Kim; Hee Jun Choi; Jai Min Ryu; Se Kyung Lee; Jong Han Yu; Seok Won Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Validation of CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore staging systems after preoperative systemic therapy of breast cancer: Protocol of a retrospective multicenter cohort study in China.

Authors:  Ling Xu; Zhuo Zhang; Qianxin Liu; Bin Zhou; Yinhua Liu; Qian Xiang; Sainan Zhu; Xuening Duan; Yimin Cui
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jiehua He; Julia Y Tsang; Xiaodan Xu; Jibin Li; Mei Li; Xue Chao; Yuanyuan Xu; Rongzhen Luo; Gary M Tse; Peng Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.