Literature DB >> 28739631

Uterine perforation by intrauterine devices: a 16-year review.

Paul A O'Brien1, Sarah Pillai2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One of the major concerns with the insertion of intrauterine devices is uterine perforation. Though uncommon, it can be debilitating and result in failure of the device. In this article we review uterine perforation with intrauterine contraception (IUC) in a community clinic in the UK over a 16-year period.
METHODS: We prospectively collected data on uterine perforations for the years 2000-2015, reviewed associated factors and calculated the annual rate of perforation, estimating if this lay within the expected range of normal variation using statistical process control (SPC) analysis. We analysed the rates of perforation in relation to the time from delivery and to breastfeeding.
RESULTS: We identified 30 uterine perforations in 22 795 IUC insertions over the 16 years of observation, with an annual rate ranging from 0 to 4.3 per 1000 insertions, and a mean annual rate of 1.3 per 1000 insertions (95% CI 0.9 to 1.9), which remain within the SPC limits. Twenty-eight of the perforations were in parous women, 87% of whom were within 18 weeks of delivery, peaking at 13 weeks postpartum. Twenty of these were in breastfeeding women. In 3/28 cases for which we have outcome data the device was adherent to or had perforated either the bladder or bowel.
CONCLUSION: Our perforation rate is consistent with other studies. Most of our perforations were within 18 weeks of childbirth, earlier than in a recent major study. We cannot tell from our data if there is a true peak in perforations 3 months postpartum as that may be a time when a high proportion of insertions are done. © Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family planning service provision; intrauterine devices; intrauterine systems; ong-acting reversible contraception; uterine perforation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739631     DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  2 in total

1.  Migration of intrauterine device caused asymptomatic acute appendicitis: A case report.

Authors:  Mehrangiz Zamani Bonab; Roghayeh Anvari Aliabad; Shohreh Alimohammadi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-24

2.  Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens.

Authors:  Jane Duncan; Kathryn Fay; Jessica Sanders; Benjamin Cappiello; Jane Saviers-Steiger; David K Turok
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.