Literature DB >> 28739031

Comparison of Outcomes of Pericardiocentesis Versus Surgical Pericardial Window in Patients Requiring Drainage of Pericardial Effusions.

Samuel E Horr1, Amgad Mentias2, Penny L Houghtaling2, Andrew J Toth2, Eugene H Blackstone2, Douglas R Johnston2, Allan L Klein2.   

Abstract

Comparative outcomes of patients undergoing pericardiocentesis or pericardial window are limited. Development of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery is common but no data exist to guide best management. Procedural billing codes and Cleveland Clinic surgical registries were used to identify 1,281 patients who underwent either pericardiocentesis or surgical pericardial window between January 2000 and December 2012. The 656 patients undergoing an intervention for a pericardial effusion secondary to cardiac surgery were also compared. Propensity scoring was used to identify well-matched patients in each group. In the overall cohort, in-hospital mortality was similar between the group undergoing pericardiocentesis and surgical drainage (5.3% vs 4.4%, p = 0.49). Similar outcomes were found in the propensity-matched group (4.9% vs 6.1%, p = 0.55). Re-accumulation was more common after pericardiocentesis (24% vs 10%, p <0.0001) and remained in the matched cohorts (23% vs 9%, p <0.0001). The secondary outcome of hemodynamic instability after the procedure was more common in the pericardial window group in both the unmatched (5.2% vs 2.9%, p = 0.036) and matched cohorts (6.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.022). In the subgroup of patients with a pericardial effusion secondary to cardiac surgery, there was a lower mortality after pericardiocentesis in the unmatched group (1.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.024); however, after adjustment, this difference in mortality was no longer present (2.6% vs 4.5%, p = 0.36). In conclusion, both pericardiocentesis and surgical pericardial window are safe and effective treatment strategies for the patient with a pericardial effusion. In our study there were no significant differences in mortality in patients undergoing either procedure. Observed differences in outcomes with regard to recurrence rates, hemodynamic instability, and in those with postcardiac surgery effusions may help to guide the clinician in management of the patient requiring therapeutic or diagnostic drainage of a pericardial effusion.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28739031     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  CT-Guided Pericardial Drainage: A Safe and Viable Alternative to Ultrasound-Guided Drainage.

Authors:  Ross B Ingber; Mustafa Al-Roubaie; Umairullah Lodhi; Craig Greben
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

2.  Comparison of the effectiveness of pericardiocentesis and surgical pericardiotomy in the prognosis of patients with blunt traumatic cardiac tamponade: a multicenter study using the Japan Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Kenichiro Omoto; Chie Tanaka; Reo Fukuda; Takashi Tagami; Kyoko Unemoto
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Recurrent pericardial effusion and tamponade after epicardial pacemaker lead placement: a case report.

Authors:  Danh Q Nguyen; Geoffrey D Huntley; Timothy A Zaki; Darren K McGuire
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Chloe Thabet; Zachary MacDonald; Christopher Johnson; Joel Niznick; Habibat Aziz Garuba; Angeline Law
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-12-09

5.  Predictors of Recurrence and Survival in Cancer Patients With Pericardial Effusion Requiring Pericardiocentesis.

Authors:  Talha Ahmed; Elie Mouhayar; Juhee Song; Efstratios Koutroumpakis; Nicolas L Palaskas; Syed Wamique Yusuf; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir A Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Ara A Vaporciyan; Stephen Swisher; Anita Deswal; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Pericardiocentesis or surgical drainage: A national comparison of clinical outcomes and resource use.

Authors:  Chelsea S Pan; Russyan Mark Mabeza; Zachary Tran; Cory Lee; Joseph Hadaya; Yas Sanaiha; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effectiveness and outcomes of 2 therapeutic interventions for cardiac tamponade: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Hady Zgheib; Cynthia Wakil; Sami Shayya; Rana Bachir; Mazen El Sayed
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A Comprehensive Systemic Literature Review of Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: Often Unrecognized and Potentially Fatal Syndrome.

Authors:  Ahmed Amro; Kanaan Mansoor; Mohammad Amro; Amal Sobeih; Mohamed Suliman; Kelechukwu Okoro; Rawan El-Hamdani; Daniel Vilchez; Mehiar El-Hamdani; Yousef R Shweihat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.