| Literature DB >> 28738326 |
Keita Kai1, Akimichi Minesaki, Kumiko Suzuki, Mikio Monji, Mitsuo Nakamura, Hisayuki Tsugitomi, Yuichiro Kuratomi, Shinichi Aishima.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma (MASC) of the salivary gland shows morphologic similarities and shares an immunophenotype and characteristic ETV6-NTRK3 translocation with secretory carcinoma of the breast. We present a buccal case of MASC along with a survey-based debate about its cytologic diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration (FNA). CASE: FNA of the buccal nodule of a 58-year-old Japanese man was initially performed by 3 cytologists who gave different assessments of the Papanicolaou classification (i.e., class II, III, and V). To investigate the potential for discrepant diagnosis of MASC on a larger scale, we distributed a survey with questions about the cytological diagnosis of the present case to cytologists at other institutions. A total of 109 cytologists completed the survey, providing varying assessments of the Papanicolaou classification: class I/II (14%), class III (53%), and class IV/V (33%). Most of the respondents (72%) could not identify a particular tumor or disease. Even the respondents who identified a particular tumor suggested widely differing diagnoses, from a benign lesion to various malignant tumors. Only 2 respondents correctly identified MASC.Entities:
Keywords: Buccal mucosa; Cytology; Fine-needle aspiration; Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma; Minor salivary gland; Secretory carcinoma; Survey
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28738326 DOI: 10.1159/000477390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Cytol ISSN: 0001-5547 Impact factor: 2.319