Laura C Hanson1,2,3, Frances Collichio4, Stephen A Bernard2,4, William A Wood4, Matt Milowsky4, Erin Burgess5, Crista J Creedle6, Summer Cheek6, Lydia Chang7, Bhisham Chera8, Alexandra Fox3, Feng-Chang Lin9. 1. 1 Division of Geriatric Medicine, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. 2 Palliative Care Program, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. 3 Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. 4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. 5 Performance Improvement & Patient Safety, UNC Hospitals , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 6. 6 Hematology Oncology Nursing, UNC Hospitals , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 7. 7 Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 8. 8 Patient Safety and Quality, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 9. 9 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend palliative care for patients with advanced cancer, but gaps in access and quality of care persist. OBJECTIVE: To increase goals-of-care (GOC) communication for hospitalized patients with Stage IV cancer. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team designed a quality improvement intervention to enhance oncology palliative care, including training in communication skills and triggers for palliative care consults. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: All adult inpatients with Stage IV cancer and unplanned admission at an 804-bed hospital affiliated with a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Center. MEASUREMENTS: The primary quality measure was the percentage of patients with Stage IV cancer who had a GOC discussion during hospitalization; secondary measures included screening for pain, dyspnea, spiritual needs, and outcomes of intensive care, hospice, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: In the 11-month study period, n = 330, Stage IV cancer patients were hospitalized. Comparing the first three months with the final three months, rates of GOC discussion increased from 29% to 48% (p = 0.013), and specialty palliative care consultation increased from 18% to 33%, (p = 0.026). Rates of symptom screening, intensive care unit transfer, hospice, and 30-day re-admission did not change overall. However, patients with specialty palliative care more frequently had pain screening (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.020), spiritual assessment (48% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and hospice referral (39% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), and they were less likely to be re-admitted within 30 days (12% vs. 21%, p = 0.059). DISCUSSION: Interdisciplinary quality improvement was effective to increase GOC discussions and palliative care consults for patients with Stage IV cancer.
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend palliative care for patients with advanced cancer, but gaps in access and quality of care persist. OBJECTIVE: To increase goals-of-care (GOC) communication for hospitalized patients with Stage IV cancer. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team designed a quality improvement intervention to enhance oncology palliative care, including training in communication skills and triggers for palliative care consults. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: All adult inpatients with Stage IV cancer and unplanned admission at an 804-bed hospital affiliated with a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Center. MEASUREMENTS: The primary quality measure was the percentage of patients with Stage IV cancer who had a GOC discussion during hospitalization; secondary measures included screening for pain, dyspnea, spiritual needs, and outcomes of intensive care, hospice, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: In the 11-month study period, n = 330, Stage IV cancerpatients were hospitalized. Comparing the first three months with the final three months, rates of GOC discussion increased from 29% to 48% (p = 0.013), and specialty palliative care consultation increased from 18% to 33%, (p = 0.026). Rates of symptom screening, intensive care unit transfer, hospice, and 30-day re-admission did not change overall. However, patients with specialty palliative care more frequently had pain screening (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.020), spiritual assessment (48% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and hospice referral (39% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), and they were less likely to be re-admitted within 30 days (12% vs. 21%, p = 0.059). DISCUSSION: Interdisciplinary quality improvement was effective to increase GOC discussions and palliative care consults for patients with Stage IV cancer.
Authors: Rachelle E Bernacki; Danielle N Ko; Philip Higgins; Sandra N Whitlock; Amelia Cullinan; Robin Wilson; Vicki Jackson; Constance Dahlin; Janet Abrahm; Elizabeth Mort; Kenneth N Scheer; Susan Block; J Andrew Billings Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Betty R Ferrell; Jennifer S Temel; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Janice I Firn; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Tanyanika Phillips; Ellen L Stovall; Camilla Zimmermann; Thomas J Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gabrielle B Rocque; Toby C Campbell; Sara K Johnson; Jonathan King; Meghan R Zander; Renae M Quale; Jens C Eickhoff; James F Cleary Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Glenn Gade; Ingrid Venohr; Douglas Conner; Kathleen McGrady; Jeffrey Beane; Robert H Richardson; Marilyn P Williams; Marcia Liberson; Mark Blum; Richard Della Penna Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Daisy Goodman; Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; G Ross Baker; Jane Barnsteiner; Tina C Foster; Kari Gali; Joanne Hilden; Leora Horwitz; Heather C Kaplan; Jerome Leis; John C Matulis; Susan Michie; Rebecca Miltner; Julia Neily; William A Nelson; Matthew Niedner; Brant Oliver; Lori Rutman; Richard Thomson; Johan Thor Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Daniel Hong; Lauren C Das; Ellen Daily; Stacie K Levine; Olwen M Hahn; Stanley L Liauw; Daniel W Golden; Christina H Son Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lisa D DiMartino; Bryan J Weiner; Laura C Hanson; Morris Weinberger; Sarah A Birken; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Justin G Trogdon Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2017-12-19
Authors: Nita Khandelwal; Ann C Long; Robert Y Lee; Cara L McDermott; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Laura C Hanson; Kathryn L Wessell; Jenny Hanspal; Feng-Chang Lin; Frances A Collichio; Darren DeWalt; Matthew I Milowsky; Donald L Rosenstein; Gary S Winzelberg; William A Wood; Natalie C Ernecoff Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2021-02-27 Impact factor: 5.576
Authors: Jason J Bischof; Montika Bush; Rayad Bin Shams; Frances A Collichio; Timothy F Platts-Mills Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura C Hanson; Natalie C Ernecoff; Kathryn L Wessell; Feng-Chang Lin; Matthew I Milowsky; Frances A Collichio; William A Wood; Donald L Rosenstein Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Rita C Crooms; Hung-Mo Lin; Sean Neifert; Stacie G Deiner; Jess W Brallier; Nathan E Goldstein; Jonathan S Gal; Laura P Gelfman Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 2.947