Shiro Nakamori1, An H Bui1,2, Jihye Jang1, Hossam A El-Rewaidy1, Shingo Kato1, Long H Ngo1, Mark E Josephson1,2, Warren J Manning1,3, Reza Nezafat1. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the relationship between diffuse myocardial fibrosis and complex ventricular arrhythmias (ComVA) in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). We hypothesized that NICM patients with ComVA would have a higher native myocardial T1 time, suggesting more extensive myocardial diffuse fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled NICM patients with a history of ComVA (n = 50) and age-matched NICM patients without ComVA (n = 57). Imaging was performed at 1.5T with a protocol that included cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for left ventricular (LV) function, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for focal scar, and native T1 mapping for diffuse fibrosis assessment. RESULTS: Global native T1 time was significantly higher in patients with NICM with ComVA when compared to patients with NICM without ComVA (1131 ± 42 vs. 1107 ± 45 msec, P = 0.006), and this finding remained after excluding segments with scar on LGE (1124 ± 36 vs. 1102 ± 44 msec, P = 0.006). Native T1 was similar in NICM patients with and without the presence of LGE (1121 ± 39 vs. 1117 ± 48 msec, P = 0.68) and mildly correlated with LV end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.27, P = 0.005), LV end-systolic volume index (r = 0.24, P = 0.01), and LV ejection fraction (r = -0.28, P = 0.003). Native T1 value for each 10-msec increment was an independent predictor of ComVA (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.25; P = 0.008) beyond LV function and LGE. CONCLUSION: NICM patients with ComVA have higher native T1 compared to NICM without any documented ComVA. Native myocardial T1 is independently associated with ComVA, after adjusting for LV function and LGE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:779-786. In memoriam: The authors are grateful for Dr. Josephson's inspiring guidance and contributions to this study.
PURPOSE: To study the relationship between diffuse myocardial fibrosis and complex ventricular arrhythmias (ComVA) in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). We hypothesized that NICM patients with ComVA would have a higher native myocardial T1 time, suggesting more extensive myocardial diffuse fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled NICM patients with a history of ComVA (n = 50) and age-matched NICM patients without ComVA (n = 57). Imaging was performed at 1.5T with a protocol that included cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for left ventricular (LV) function, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for focal scar, and native T1 mapping for diffuse fibrosis assessment. RESULTS: Global native T1 time was significantly higher in patients with NICM with ComVA when compared to patients with NICM without ComVA (1131 ± 42 vs. 1107 ± 45 msec, P = 0.006), and this finding remained after excluding segments with scar on LGE (1124 ± 36 vs. 1102 ± 44 msec, P = 0.006). Native T1 was similar in NICM patients with and without the presence of LGE (1121 ± 39 vs. 1117 ± 48 msec, P = 0.68) and mildly correlated with LV end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.27, P = 0.005), LV end-systolic volume index (r = 0.24, P = 0.01), and LV ejection fraction (r = -0.28, P = 0.003). Native T1 value for each 10-msec increment was an independent predictor of ComVA (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.25; P = 0.008) beyond LV function and LGE. CONCLUSION: NICM patients with ComVA have higher native T1 compared to NICM without any documented ComVA. Native myocardial T1 is independently associated with ComVA, after adjusting for LV function and LGE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:779-786. In memoriam: The authors are grateful for Dr. Josephson's inspiring guidance and contributions to this study.
Authors: Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Martínez-Rubio; Y Schwammenthal; E Schwammenthal; M Block; L Reinhardt; A Garcia-Alberola; G Sierra; M Shenasa; W Haverkamp; H H Scheld; G Breithardt; M Borggrefe Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-07-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G M Felker; R E Thompson; J M Hare; R H Hruban; D E Clemetson; D L Howard; K L Baughman; E K Kasper Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; John L Sapp; Andrew P Selwyn; Gregory Couper; Laurence M Epstein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alan Kadish; Alan Dyer; James P Daubert; Rebecca Quigg; N A Mark Estes; Kelley P Anderson; Hugh Calkins; David Hoch; Jeffrey Goldberger; Alaa Shalaby; William E Sanders; Andi Schaechter; Joseph H Levine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J A McCrohon; J C C Moon; S K Prasad; W J McKenna; C H Lorenz; A J S Coats; D J Pennell Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven Bellm; Tamer A Basha; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Charlene Liew; Maxine Tang; Long H Ngo; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sophie I Mavrogeni; Petros P Sfikakis; Theodoros Dimitroulas; Loukia Koutsogeorgopoulou; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; George Poulos; Genovefa Kolovou; George Theodorakis; George D Kitas Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Brendan L Eck; Scott D Flamm; Deborah H Kwon; W H Wilson Tang; Claudia Prieto Vasquez; Nicole Seiberlich Journal: Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 9.795
Authors: Laura Keil; Céleste Chevalier; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Gunnar Lund; Kai Müllerleile; Christina Magnussen Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 5.923