INTRODUCTION: Predicting the timing and locations of future mosquito-borne disease outbreaks has the potential to improve the targeting of mosquito control and disease prevention efforts. Here, we present and evaluate prospective forecasts made prior to and during the 2016 West Nile virus (WNV) season in South Dakota, a hotspot for human WNV transmission in the United States. METHODS: We used a county-level logistic regression model to predict the weekly probability of human WNV case occurrence as a function of temperature, precipitation, and an index of mosquito infection status. The model was specified and fitted using historical data from 2004-2015 and was applied in 2016 to make short-term forecasts of human WNV cases in the upcoming week as well as whole-year forecasts of WNV cases throughout the entire transmission season. These predictions were evaluated at the end of the 2016 WNV season by comparing them with spatial and temporal patterns of the human cases that occurred. RESULTS: There was an outbreak of WNV in 2016, with a total of 167 human cases compared to only 40 in 2015. Model results were generally accurate, with an AUC of 0.856 for short-term predictions. Early-season temperature data were sufficient to predict an earlier-than-normal start to the WNV season and an above-average number of cases, but underestimated the overall case burden. Model predictions improved throughout the season as more mosquito infection data were obtained, and by the end of July the model provided a close estimate of the overall magnitude of the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated model that included meteorological variables as well as a mosquito infection index as predictor variables accurately predicted the resurgence of WNV in South Dakota in 2016. Key areas for future research include refining the model to improve predictive skill and developing strategies to link forecasts with specific mosquito control and disease prevention activities.
INTRODUCTION: Predicting the timing and locations of future mosquito-borne disease outbreaks has the potential to improve the targeting of mosquito control and disease prevention efforts. Here, we present and evaluate prospective forecasts made prior to and during the 2016 West Nile virus (WNV) season in South Dakota, a hotspot for humanWNV transmission in the United States. METHODS: We used a county-level logistic regression model to predict the weekly probability of humanWNV case occurrence as a function of temperature, precipitation, and an index of mosquito infection status. The model was specified and fitted using historical data from 2004-2015 and was applied in 2016 to make short-term forecasts of humanWNV cases in the upcoming week as well as whole-year forecasts of WNV cases throughout the entire transmission season. These predictions were evaluated at the end of the 2016 WNV season by comparing them with spatial and temporal patterns of the human cases that occurred. RESULTS: There was an outbreak of WNV in 2016, with a total of 167 human cases compared to only 40 in 2015. Model results were generally accurate, with an AUC of 0.856 for short-term predictions. Early-season temperature data were sufficient to predict an earlier-than-normal start to the WNV season and an above-average number of cases, but underestimated the overall case burden. Model predictions improved throughout the season as more mosquito infection data were obtained, and by the end of July the model provided a close estimate of the overall magnitude of the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated model that included meteorological variables as well as a mosquito infection index as predictor variables accurately predicted the resurgence of WNV in South Dakota in 2016. Key areas for future research include refining the model to improve predictive skill and developing strategies to link forecasts with specific mosquito control and disease prevention activities.
Authors: William J Landesman; Brian F Allan; R Brian Langerhans; Tiffany M Knight; Jonathan M Chase Journal: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.133
Authors: Shlomit Paz; Dan Malkinson; Manfred S Green; Gil Tsioni; Anna Papa; Kostas Danis; Anca Sirbu; Cornelia Ceianu; Krisztalovics Katalin; Emőke Ferenczi; Herve Zeller; Jan C Semenza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: V L Kulasekera; L Kramer; R S Nasci; F Mostashari; B Cherry; S C Trock; C Glaser; J R Miller Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: John P DeGroote; Ramanathan Sugumaran; Sarah M Brend; Brad J Tucker; Lyric C Bartholomay Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Dominik Fischer; Stephanie M Thomas; Jonathan E Suk; Bertrand Sudre; Andrea Hess; Nils B Tjaden; Carl Beierkuhnlein; Jan C Semenza Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Geoffrey P Vincent; Justin K Davis; Matthew J Wittry; Michael C Wimberly; Chris D Carlson; Denise L Patton; Michael B Hildreth Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 2.278
Authors: Nicholas B DeFelice; Zachary D Schneider; Eliza Little; Christopher Barker; Kevin A Caillouet; Scott R Campbell; Dan Damian; Patrick Irwin; Herff M P Jones; John Townsend; Jeffrey Shaman Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Imelda K Moise; Lola R Ortiz-Whittingham; Vincent Omachonu; Marah Clark; Rui-De Xue Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: James Hadfield; Anderson F Brito; Daniele M Swetnam; Chantal B F Vogels; Ryan E Tokarz; Kristian G Andersen; Ryan C Smith; Trevor Bedford; Nathan D Grubaugh Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 6.823